Innovative Teaching and New Educational Trajectories: From Methodological Change to Learning Success
Generoso Romano, Francesco Tafuri
Abstract
This literature review explores the impact of innovative teaching practices on the improvement of student learning, focusing on the intersection between pedagogical transformation and digital integration. In an era marked by rapid technological change and increasing educational complexity, traditional teaching models are being re-evaluated in light of active methodologies and student-centered approaches. The review analyzes how tools such as learning management systems, immersive environments, and artificial intelligence, combined with strategies like problem-based learning, flipped classrooms, and gamification, contribute to enhanced motivation, academic performance, engagement, and critical thinking. Empirical studies and comparative data indicate that innovative approaches often outperform traditional ones in fostering deeper and more meaningful learning experiences. However, the benefits of innovation are not uniform and are influenced by factors such as teacher preparedness, institutional support, and equitable access to technology. Digital divides, resistance to change, and insufficient professional development emerge as significant barriers to effective implementation. The review argues that innovation should not be understood solely as the adoption of new technologies, but as a comprehensive rethinking of educational purposes, roles, and structures. Sustainable innovation requires alignment with inclusive pedagogies, curricular flexibility, and a strong ethical foundation that promotes equity and human development. Ultimately, the paper concludes that meaningful educational innovation must integrate technological advancement with pedagogical intentionality, ensuring that all students are empowered to participate actively and critically in their learning journeys. Future research should investigate long-term impacts, contextual adaptability, and systemic enablers of successful innovation in education.
Keywords
References
Al-Fraihat, D., Joy, M., Masa’deh, R., & Sinclair, J. (2020). Evaluating E-learning systems
success: An empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 67–86.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.004
Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Tamim, R., Surkes, M., & Bethel,
E. C. (2009). A meta-analysis of three types of interaction treatments in distance
education.
Review
of
Educational
Research,
79(3),
1243–1289.
https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654309333844
Biesta, G. (2010). Good education in an age of measurement: Ethics, politics, democracy.
Routledge.
Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Harvard University Press.
CAST.
(2018).
Universal
Design
for
Learning
guidelines
version
2.2.
http://udlguidelines.cast.org
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional
development. Learning Policy Institute.
Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to
gamefulness: Defining “gamification”. In Proceedings of the 15th International
Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments (pp. 9–15).
https://doi.org/10.1145/2181037.2181040
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. Macmillan.
Di Pietro, G., Biagi, F., Costa, P., Karpi?ski, Z., & Mazza, J. (2020). The likely impact of
COVID-19 on education: Reflections based on the existing literature and recent
international datasets (EUR 30275 EN). Publications Office of the European Union.
https://doi.org/10.2760/126686
DomĂnguez, A., Saenz-de-Navarrete, J., de-Marcos, L., Fernández-Sanz, L., PagĂ©s, C.,
MartĂnez-Herráiz, J. J. (2013). Gamifying learning experiences: Practical implications
and
outcomes.
Computers
&
Education,
63,
380–392.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.020
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the
concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.
https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., &
Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science,
engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
Fullan, M., & Langworthy, M. (2014). A rich seam: How new pedagogies find deep learning.
Pearson.
Gillies, R. M. (2016). Cooperative learning: Review of research and practice. Australian
Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 39–54. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2016v41n3.3
Graham, C. R. (2013). Emerging practice and research in blended learning. In M. G.
Moore (Ed.), Handbook of distance education (3rd ed., pp. 333–350). Routledge.
Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (2014). Does gamification work? A literature review of
empirical studies on gamification. In 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on
System Sciences (pp. 3025–3034). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2014.377
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to
achievement. Routledge.
Karabulut-Ilgu, A., Jaramillo Cherrez, N., & Jahren, C. T. (2018). A systematic review of
research on the flipped learning method in engineering education. British Journal of
Educational Technology, 49(3), 398–411. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12548
Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge
(TPACK)? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60–70.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and
development. Prentice Hall.
Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a design science: Building pedagogical patterns for learning
and technology. Routledge.
Lo, C. K., & Hew, K. F. (2019). A critical review of flipped classroom challenges in K-12
education: Possible solutions and recommendations for future research. Research and
Practice
in
Technology
Enhanced
Learning,
14(1),
1–22.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-019-0122-0
OECD. (2018). The future of education and skills: Education 2030. OECD Publishing.
https://www.oecd.org/education/2030/
Pane, J. F., Steiner, E. D., Baird, M. D., & Hamilton, L. S. (2015). Continued progress:
Promising evidence on personalized learning. RAND Corporation.
Parong, J., & Mayer, R. E. (2018). Learning science in immersive virtual reality. Journal of
Educational Psychology, 110(6), 785–797. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000241
Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering
Education,
93(3),
223–231.
https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x
Redecker, C., & Punie, Y. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of
educators: DigCompEdu. Publications Office of the European Union.
Radianti, J., Majchrzak, T. A., Fromm, J., & Wohlgenannt, I. (2020). A systematic review of
immersive virtual reality applications for higher education: Design elements, lessons
learned,
and
research
agenda.
Computers
&
Education,
147,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103778
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic
motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
Savery, J. R. (2015). Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions.
Interdisciplinary
Journal
of
Problem-Based
Learning,
1(1),
9–20.
https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1002
Selwyn, N. (2016). Education and technology: Key issues and debates (2nd ed.). Bloomsbury
Academic.
Tamim, R. M., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Abrami, P. C., & Schmid, R. F. (2011). What
forty years of research says about the impact of technology on learning. Review of
Educational Research, 81(1), 4–28. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654310393361
Tiwari, A., Lai, P., So, M., & Yuen, K. (2006). A comparison of the effects of problem-based
learning and lecturing on the development of students’ critical thinking. Medical
Education,
40(6),
547–554.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02481.x
van Dijk, J. (2020). The digital divide. Polity Press.
UNESCO. (2015). Education 2030: Incheon Declaration and Framework for Action.
https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000245656
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological
processes. Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes.
Harvard University Press.
Zawacki-Richter, O., MarĂn, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of
research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education–where are the
educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education,
16(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
