INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND COMMUNICATION STUDIES (IJELCS )
E-ISSN 2545-5702
P-ISSN 2695-2157
VOL. 9 NO. 4 2024
DOI: 10.56201/ijelcs.v9.no3.2024.pg125.136
Abubakar Atiku Alkali Halima Abdullahi Aminu
African literary writers are conscious of their existential experiences in colonial and post- colonial eras. Their works focus on attacking the perpetuation of the status-quo: colonialism, corruption and gender discrimination. This explains why their themes are mostly historically rooted. Solidarity is one of the thematic concerns of post-colonial African literary writings, as in Ola Rotimi’s Hopes of the Living Dead. The themes of the play are national solidarity, self- reliance and purposeful leadership. African literary writers communicate their themes by relying heavily on principles of effective communication which are essentially linguistic conventions. Linguistic features of communication are systematic and functional. According to Fowler (1981), “linguistic structure is not arbitrary. It is determined and motivated by the functions it performs.” Deploying insights from phonology, grammar, stylistics and pragmatics, this study is poised to reveal language use in African Literature, as a purposeful and productive indulgence, rather than being incidental. The study is anchored on Text Analysis Theory and Lee’s (1997) Cognitive Grammar Theory in the analysis of selected data from Hopes of the Living Dead. The study concludes that in writing as solidarity, linguistic features are used for the purpose of persuasive speech, and such features include specific clause structures, focused speech acts cohesive devices, image-conjuring diction as well as events-connecting nouns and pronouns.
African Literature, Solidarity, Grammar, Stylistics, Text Analysis Theory, Cognitive
Acheoah, J. E. (2013). Phonology of Nigerian English. In Ayodabo J. O. and Butari P.N. Issues
in Language and Linguistics: The Nigerian Perspective. Kaduna: Language Study
Group: 1-12.
Acheoah, J. E. (2015). The Pragma-crafting Theory: A Proposed Theoretical Framework for
Pragmatic Analysis. American Research Journal of English and Literature, 1(2), 21-
Adegbija, E. F. (Ed.) (1999). The English Language and Literature in English: An Introductory
Handbook. University of Ilorin.
Adejare, O. (1992). Communicative competence in English as a second language. In A.
Bamgbose et al. (Eds.), New Englishes. The British Council.
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Harvard University Press.
Bach, K. & Harnish, R. (1979). Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. The MIT
Press.
Choudhary, R. (2019). Pragmatics. Random Publications.
Fowler, R. (1981). Literature as social discourse: the practice of linguistic criticism.
Indiana UP.
Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Penguin Books.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and Conversation. In Cole and Morgan. (Eds.)
Lee, T. (1997). Language as power: a critique of U.S. English. The Modern Language Journal,
80 (ii), 129-140.
Leech, G. & Short, M. H. (1981). Style in fiction: An introduction to English fictional prose.
Longman Group Limited.
Meechan, M. (2004). Language in social contexts. In William O’ Grady and John Archibald
(Eds.), Contemporary Linguistic Analysis: An Introduction. Pearson Education Inc., pp.
426-428.
Mey, J. (2001). An Introduction to Pragmatics. Blackwell Publishing.
Oloruntoba-Oju, T. (1999). Sociolinguistics: an overview. In E. Adebija (Ed). The English
Language and Literature in English: An Introductory Handbook. University of Ilorin.
Rotimi, Ola (1988). Hopes of the Living Dead. Ibadan: Spectrum in Association with Safari
Books Limited.
Savas, L. T. (1994). Ways of doing things with words: An introduction. In L. T. Savas (Ed.),
Foundations of Speech Acts Theory: Philosophical and Linguistic Perspectives. Routledge.
Searle, J. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University
Press.
Stubbs, M. (1983). Discourse analysis. Blackwell.
Verschueren, J. (2003). Understanding Pragmatics. Hodder Arnold.
Yau, X. (2013). Pragmatic Interpretation of the English Present Perfect. Linguistics. 51(5)993
1018.