WORLD JOURNAL OF INNOVATION AND MODERN TECHNOLOGY (WJIMT )

E-ISSN 2504-4766
P-ISSN 2682-5910
VOL. 8 NO. 4 2024
DOI: 10.56201/wjimt.v8.no4.2024.pg140.149


Effects Of Collaborative Practicum, Experimental Demonstration And Lecture Methods On Retention Of Basic Technology Students In Edo State

KELUBIA, Daniel Isioma, Prof. Umunadi, Ejiwoke Kennedy, Prof. Samuel Idowu Akinseinde


Abstract


The study investigated the effects of collaborative practicum, experimental demonstration, and lecture method on the retention of Edo State basic technology students. This study employed a 3x2 pretest, posttest, control group quasi-experimental design. The research sample consisted of 312 JSII basic technology students from six public mixed junior secondary schools in Edo State. The data collection instrument employed was the Basic Technology Achievement Test (BTAT). The validity of the BAT was confirmed by three experts. A Kuder-Richardson 21 test was employed to assess the reliability of the BTAT. The obtained reliability coefficient value was 0.80. Prior to and following treatment, the BTAT was administered as both a pretest and a posttest. Furthermore, as a delayed posttest, the BTAT was administered four weeks subsequent to the initial posttest. Next, the data were analysed using ANCOVA, calculations of mean, and standard deviation statistics. The study revealed that students who received instruction in basic technology through collaborative practicum, experimental demonstration, and lecture method had markedly distinct average retention scores. According to Scheffe's post-hoc test, the direction of significance proceeds from the collaborative practicum, followed by the experimental demonstration and lecture, respectively. According to the study's findings, collaborative practicum, experimental demonstration, and lecture techniques can all help students retain the fundamentals of technology better. However, collaborative practicum proved to be the most successful, closely followed by experimental demonstration. The study goes on to say that, when interaction is taken into account, the utilisation of collaborative practicum, experimental demonstration and lecture method did not affect students' retention of basic technologies in conjunction with their sex. In order to increase students' active participation and engagement


keywords:

Collaborative Practicum, Experimental Demonstration, Lecture Method, Students’ Retention


References:


Ajaja, O. P. (2013). Which way do we go in the teaching of biology? Concept mapping, cooperative
learning or learning cycle? International Journal of Science and Technology Education
Research, 4(2), 18-29.

Bilesanmi-Awoderu, J. B., Afuwape, M. O., & Jolaosho, F. A. (2017). Boosting achievement using
individualized and demonstration strategies in biology: How do male and female students
behave in Nigeria? British Journal of Education, 5(3), 51-59.

Chianson, M. M., Kurumeh, M. S., & Obida, J. A. (2011). Effect of cooperative learning strategy
on students’ retention in circle geometry in secondary schools in Benue State, Nigeria.
Am. J. Sci. Ind. Res., 2(1), 33-36.

Coskun, I., & Eker, C. (2018). The effect of teaching activities done by using activity-based posters
on the students’ academic achievements, retention levels in their learning. Universal
Journal of Educational Research, 6(4), 585-597.

Dienye, N. E., & Gbamannja, S. P. T. (2019). Science education, theory and practice. Owerri:
Totan Publishers Ltd.

Emerhiona, F., Ajaja, O. P., Pius, P. O., Nwanze, A. C., & Izuegbuna, A. G. (2018). Effects of
problem and discovery-based instructional strategies on students’ academic achievement
in chemistry. International Journal of Innovative Research and Advanced Studies
(IJIRAS), 5(6), 209-214.

Eze, I. T., & Lasisi, B. T. (2018). Effects of cooperative learning method on academic achievement
and retention of students in basic technology in Oyo State. NAU Journal of Technology
& Vocational Education, 3(1), 159-171.

Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Wenderoth, M. P., &
Crowe, A. J. (2024). Active learning increases student performance in science,
engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
111(23), 8410-8415.

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2019). Cooperative learning: Improving university instruction
by basing practice on validated theory. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 30(3),
1-24.

Miller, D. (2020). The impact of teaching methods on student retention: A review of the literature.
Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 10(1), 45-60.

Okobi, C. E., & Ajaja, O. P. (2022). Effects of cooperative learning and lecture instructional
approaches (ClIA and LIA) on conceptual change of chemistry students in Delta North
Senatorial District. International Journal of Academic and Applied Research (IJAAR),
6(12), 102-105.

Schön, D. A. (2017). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York:
Routledge.

Zudonu, O. C., & Njoku, Z. C. (2018). Effect of laboratory instructional methods on students’
attitudes in some chemistry concepts at senior secondary school level. Global Scientific
Journals, 6(7), 46-61.


DOWNLOAD PDF

Back


Google Scholar logo
Crossref logo
ResearchGate logo
Open Access logo
Google logo