INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES AND MANAGEMENT RESEARCH (IJSSMR )

E-ISSN 2545-5303
P-ISSN 2695-2203
VOL. 10 NO. 3 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.56201/ijssmr.v10.no3.2024.pg66.76


Contract Disputes and Conflict Resolution in Building Projects: Lessons from Anambra State Government Projects 2015-2022

Agwu, Kelechi Destiny; Barnaby, Jude Iniabasi; Onuorah, Ikenna Michael; Igwegbe, Uzodinma Kenechukwu, & Ilouno, Dubem Okey


Abstract


The research studied contract disputes and conflict resolution in building projects in Anambra State. The research adopted a qualitative design. A mixed methods approach was deployed. A scoping review of literature was done, followed by a survey that was carried out by means of a structured questionnaire to elicit information on contract disputes and resolution in Anambra State building projects from 2015 to 2022. The survey results revealed a notable occurrence of conflicts, specifically contract disputes, within the construction initiatives of the state government. In order to optimize conflict resolution in the context of state government construction projects, the research recommends that prioritizing clear contract language, cultivating efficient communication strategies, and encouraging preemptive conflict resolution planning be undertaken. It is advisable to utilize stakeholder collaboration, continuous training, along with legal expertise in order to effectively prevent and manage conflicts.


keywords:

construction, conflict resolution, contract dispute, building project,


References:


Acharya, N. K., & Lee, Y. D. (2006). Conflicting factors in construction projects: Korean
perspective. Construction and Architectural Management, 13 (6), 543–566.

Allen, L., & Stephenson, P. (2008). Construction Disputes and How to Prevent Them:
Peter Stephenson, Lianne Barlow and Roger Knowles, Editors. Wiley?Blackwell, Oxford, 2005.
No. of pages: xx + 416. Construction Management and Economics, 26(6), 646-647.

Cheung, S. O., & Yiu, T. W. (2006). Are construction disputes inevitable?, IEEE Transactions on
Engineering Management, 53 (3), 456–470


DOWNLOAD PDF

Back


Google Scholar logo
Crossref logo
ResearchGate logo
Open Access logo
Google logo