International Journal of Education and Evaluation (IJEE )

E-ISSN 2489-0073
P-ISSN 2695-1940
VOL. 8 NO. 5 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.56201/ijee.v8.no5.2022.pg19.32


Influence of Teacher Characteristics on Physics Students’ Academic Achievement in Secondary Schools in Khana and Gokana Local Government Areas of Rivers State

NTAAH, Barilee Christian, Dr. T. Adolphus


Abstract


The study investigated the influence of teacher characteristics on physics students’ achievement in secondary schools in Khana and Gokana local government Area. Five research questions were formulated to guide the study and five hypotheses were tested for the study. The descriptive survey research design was adopted with a population 0f 1887. A sample of 553 was drawn with the aid of Krejcie and Morgan, out of which 20 were principal, 291 khana students, and 242 Gokana students. The instrument titled Influence of Teachers Characteristics on Physics Students Academic Achievement was used to elicit information from the respondents. The questionnaire was coded using 4 point rating scale of Strongly Agreed, Agreed, Disagreed and Strongly Disagreed. The instrument was duly validated by experts, while the Cronbach Alpha method of reliability was employed and it yielded the following indices: cluster one 0.75, cluster two 0.81, cluster three 0.67, cluster four 0.79, and cluster five 0.87.The research questions were answered using means and standard deviation, while the hypotheses were tested using z-test statistics at 0.05 level of significance. The results showed that; Teachers’ qualification promotes academic achievement among physics students; teachers’ attitude do not really influence academic achievement among physics students; teacher’s experience actually influenced academic achievement among physics; teacher’s gender also influences academic achievement among physics students, and that teacher’s age has no significant effect on academic performance of physics students in Khana and Gokana local government area. And recommended that: teachers should be given the opportunity to further their studies in order to increase their knowledge in physics; all teachers are role models and as such, expected to put up the best behaviour in the classroom; experience as usually said, is the best teacher, therefore teachers should explore themselves base on life


keywords:

Academic, Achievement, Characteristics, Influence, and Physics


References:


Adolphus, T. & Aziaka, L. S. (2020). Influence of Teacher Qualification and Experience on
Secondary School Physics Students? Enrolment and Academic Attainment Rivers State,
Nigeria.

Blömeke, S., Olsen, R. V., & Suhl, U. (2016). Relation of student achievement to the quality of
their teachers and instructional quality.In T. Nilsen& J.-E.Gustafsson (Eds.), Teacher
quality, instructional quality and student outcomes. IEA Research for Education 2, 21–50

Buddin, R. & Gema, Z. (2009).Teacher qualifications and student achievement in urban
elementary schools.Journal of Urban Economics. (66), 2, 103-115.

Cavalluzzo, L. C. (2004). Is National Board Certification an Effective Signal of Teacher
Quality? Alexandria, Virginia: The CNA Corporation. Retrieved March 9, 2013 from
http://www.nbpts.org/userfiles/file/final_study_11204_d_-_cavalluzzo_-_cna_corp..pdf.

Clotfelter, C.T., Ladd, H.F., & Vigdor, J.L. (2010). Teacher credentials and student achievement
in high school: A cross-subject analysis with student fixed effects. The Journal of Human
Resources, 45(3), 665-681.

Croninger, G.R. &Valli, I. (2009).Challenges to studying the teaching of reading in elementary
classrooms (Sage). Journal of Educational Researchers, 38(2), 100-108.

Crosnoe, R., Johnson, M. K., & Elder, G. H. (2004). Intergenerational bonding in school: The
behavioural and contextual correlates of students-teacher relationship. Sociology of
Education, 77(1), 60-81.

Curby, T.W., Rudasill, K.M., Ewards, T. & Perez, E. (2011). The role of classroom quality in a
metrolating the academic and social risks associated with difficulty temperament. School
Psychology Quarterly, 26(2), 175-180.

Darling-Hammond, L. (1998). Teacher and teaching; testing policy hypothesis from a national
commission report. Educational Researcher. 27(1):5-15.

Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state
policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1), 1–44.

Darling-Hammond, L. (2014).Strengthening clinical preparation: The holy grail of teacher
education.Peabody Journal of Education, 89(4), 547–561.

Dougles, E.P., &Amelink, C.T. (2009).Quantitative, qualitiative and mixed research methods in
engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(1), 53-66.

Eccles, J.S., Midgley, C.J., Wigfield, A., Buchanan, C.M., Reuman, D., Flanagan, C., & Mac
Iver, D., (1993). Development during adolescence: the impact of stage-environment fit on
young adolescents experiences in schools and families (1993). In J.M. Notterman (ed.),
the evolution of psychology: Fifty years of the American psychologist.

Farrer, C.J., & Skinner, E. (2003). Sense of relatedness as a factor in children academic
engagement and performance. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 7(6), 30-
40.

Fives, H. & Buehl, M. M. (2012). Spring cleaning for the “messy” construct of teachers? beliefs:
What are they? Which have been examined? What can they tell us.APA Educational
Psychology Handbook, 2, 471–499.

Gibbons S, Kimmel, H & O?Shea, M. (1997). Changing Teacher Behaviour through Staff
Development: Implementing the Teaching and Content Standards in Science School
Science and Mathematics; 976 (1):302-340.

Guo, Y., Sun, S., Breitsmith, A., Morrison, F.J., & Connor, M.C. (2015). Behavioural
engagement and reading achievement in elementary-school-age children: A longitudinal
cross-lagged analysis. Journal of Education Psychology, 107(2), 332-344.

Hamre, B.K., Pianta, R.C., Downer, J.T., & Mashburn, A.J. (2008). Teachers? perceptions of
conflict with young students: looking beyond problem behaviours. Social Development,
17(1), 115-136.

Hanuskek, E.A., Kan, J.F., O?Brian, D.M., & Rivkin, S.G. (2005). The market for teacher
quality. National Bureau of Economic Research Workingpaper 11154 retrieved march 9,
2013 from http://www.nber.org/papers/w11154.

Hardy, I. & Smith, E. (2006) „Contesting tertiary teaching qualification: An Australian
Perspective’ Teaching in Higher Education, 11(2), 337-350.

Henson, R. (2002). From adolescent Angst to Adulthood: Substantive implications and
measurement dilemmas in the development of teacher e?cacy research. Educational
Psychologist, 37 (2), 137–150.

Humensiky, J., Kuwabar, S., Fogee, J., Well, C., Goodwin, A., & Voorhees, V. (2010).
Adolescent with depressive symptoms and their challenges with learning in school. The
International Journal of Emotional Education, 5(3), 200-210.

Jepsen, C. (2005). Teacher characteristics and student achievement evidence from teacher
survey. Journal of Urban Economics.52(2), 5-10.

Klassen, R., &Tze, V. (2014). Teacher?s self-e?cacy, personality and teacher?se?ectiveness: A
meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 12,59–76.

Kunter, M., Klusmann, U., Baumert, J., Richter, D., Voss, T., &Hachfeld, A. (2013).
Professional competence of teachers: E?ects on instructional quality and student
development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 805.

Minishi,O., Muni, E., Mutai, P., Munyeke, F., &Omolo, H. (2004). Secondary physics students
book one, Nairobi: Kenya Literature Bureau.

Otieno, N. O. (2009). Use of discussion methods on secondary school students? achievement in
physics.A case study of UasinGishu District.Thesis, Moi University.

Perry, G.H., Dominy, N.J., Claw, K.G., Lee, A.S., Fiegler, H., Redon, R., Werner, J., Villane,
F.A., Mountain, J.L., Misra, R., Cartel, N.P., Lee, C., & Stone, A.C. (2007). Dict and the
evolution of human analyses gene copy numbers variation nature genetics, 39(10), 1256-
1260.

Pravica, M. (2005).The importance of physics. Breakthroughs Drive Economy, Quality of Life
Research,3(4), 60-66.

Rice, J. K. (2010). The impact of teacher experience: Examining the evidence and policy
implications. Brief no. 11.National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in
Education Research. Washington DC: The Urban Institute. (2010). Research brief for
the Center for Longitudinal Data in Education Research,11(10), 12-21.

Scherer, R., & Gustafsson, J. E. (2015). Student assessment of teaching as a source of
information about aspects of teaching quality in multiple subject domains: An application
of multilevel bifactor structural equation modeling. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(15), 50-
60.

Stringfield, S. & Teddlie, C. (1991). School, classroom and students? level indicators of rural
school effectiveness.A Journal of Research in Rural Education, 7(1), 15-28.

Tschannen-Moran, M., Woolfolk, H. A., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher e?cacy: Its meaning
and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68, 202–248.
Wayne, A. J. &Youngs, P. (2003). Teacher characteristics and student achievement gains: A
review. Review of Educational Research, 73,89–122.

Weinert, F. E., Schrader, F. W., &Helmke, A. (1989).Quality of instruction and achievement
outcomes.International Journal of Educational Research, 13(8), 895–914.
Wheatley, K. (2005). The case for reconceptualizing teacher e?cacy research.Teaching and
Teacher Education, 21, 747–766.

Wiswall, M. (2013).The dynamics of teacher quality. Journal of Public Economics, 100,61–78.

Zee, M., &Koomen, H. (2016). Teacher self-e?cacy and its e?ects on classroom processes,
student academic adjustment, and teacher well-being: A synthesis of 40 years of
research.Review of Educational Research, 86, 981–1015.


DOWNLOAD PDF

Back


Google Scholar logo
Crossref logo
ResearchGate logo
Open Access logo
Google logo