Submit your papersSubmit Now
For Enquiries: [email protected]
IIARD LogoIIARD

Effects of Field Trip and Demonstration-Based Teaching Methods on Students’ Academic Achievement in Basic Science

ENEH, Chinecherem Precious, OFFOR, Joseph Chidiebere, MBONU-ADIGWE, Bianca Uzoamaka, CHUKWU, Peter Ndubuisi, Corresponding author Chukwu, Peter Ndubuisi

Abstract

Background: Persistent poor academic achievement in Basic Science among junior secondary school students in Nigeria has been attributed, in part, to the continued reliance on teacher- centred instructional approaches that provide limited opportunities for active learner engagement. Although field trip and demonstration-based teaching methods have been identified as learner-centred instructional strategies capable of enhancing science learning, empirical evidence comparing their effectiveness in Basic Science remains limited, particularly within the Nigerian junior secondary school context. Purpose: This study investigated the effects of field trip and demonstration-based teaching methods on students' academic achievement in Basic Science in Nsukka Local Government Area, Enugu State, Nigeria. Specifically, the study compared students' achievement under the two instructional methods, examined the influence of gender on achievement, and determined whether teaching method and gender interacted to influence students' academic achievement. Method: The study adopted a quasi-experimental pre-test post-test non-equivalent control group design. The population comprised 4,040 Junior Secondary School II students enrolled in 30 public secondary schools, of whom 68 were selected through a multistage sampling procedure. Data were collected using the Basic Science Achievement Test , a 30-item multiple-choice instrument with a Kuder-Richardson 20 reliability coefficient of .84. Mean and standard deviation were used to answer the research questions, while Analysis of Covariance was employed to test the hypotheses at the .05 level of significance. IJEE IJEE www.ijee.io Results: Students taught using the field trip method recorded a higher post-test mean score (M = 78.44, SD = 11.63) and greater mean gain (51.57) than those taught using the demonstration-based teaching method (M = 72.19, SD = 11.20; mean gain = 44.63). ANCOVA revealed a significant main effect of teaching method on students' academic achievement, F(1, 65) = 15.54, p < .001. Gender also had a significant main effect, F(1, 65) = 12.49, p = .001, whereas the interaction between teaching method and gender was not statistically significant, F(1, 65) = 2.25, p = .137. Conclusion: The findings demonstrate that field-trip instruction is significantly more effective than demonstration-based teaching at enhancing students' academic achievement in Basic Science. Although gender significantly influenced achievement, the effectiveness of the instructional methods did not vary by gender. The study therefore recommends greater integration of field trips into Basic Science instruction to promote experiential learning and improve students' academic outcomes.

Keywords

Basic Scienceacademic achievementdemonstration methodexperiential learningfield tripgender

References

Ajayi, V. O., & Ogbeba, J. (2017). Effect of gender on students' achievement in stoichiometry using hands-on activities. International Journal of Science and Research, 6(8), 1024– 1032. Al-Balushi, S. M., & Al-Aamri, S. S. (2014). The effect of environmental science projects on students' environmental knowledge and science attitudes. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 23(3), 213–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2014.927167 Barka, M., & Idris, A. (2023). Effect of demonstration method on academic performance of senior secondary school students in Agricultural Science in Adamawa State. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 15(2), 102–117. Behrendt, M., & Franklin, T. (2014). A review of research on school field trips and their value in education. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 9(3), 235– 245. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijese.2014.213a Dale, E. (1969). Audio-visual methods in teaching (3rd ed.). Holt, Rinehart & Winston. Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791 Dawal, A. (2021). Gender differences in the attitude and achievement of secondary school students towards STEM education in Plateau State. Journal of Science Education in Africa, 9(2), 61–74. Federal Republic of Nigeria. (2014). National policy on education (6th ed.). Nigerian Educational Research and Development Council. Hattie, J. (2023). Visible learning: The sequel. Routledge. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall. Mayer, R. E. (2021). Multimedia learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. Mohammed, A., Ibrahim, M., & Sani, U. (2023). Effects of educational field trips on students' academic achievement and retention in Social Studies in tertiary institutions in Katsina State. Journal of Educational Research and Development, 18(1), 94–108. Nigerian Educational Research and Development Council. (2020). Basic science curriculum for junior secondary schools. NERDC Press. Njoku, C. O., & Mgbomo, E. F. (2021). Impact of field trip and demonstration methods on secondary school students' achievement in Biology in Rivers State, Nigeria. Journal of Educational Studies, 16(1), 48–60. OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en Okoli, J. N., & Ezeudu, F. O. (2021). Science education and sustainable national development in Nigeria. Journal of Science Teachers Association of Nigeria, 56(1), 87–99. Okoye, R. O., & Onyeka, C. N. (2023). Effectiveness of demonstration teaching method on junior secondary school students' achievement in Mathematics in Rivers State. Nigerian Journal of Educational Studies, 28(1), 74–89.