Submit your papersSubmit Now
For Enquiries: [email protected]
IIARD LogoIIARD

Influence of AI-Powered Assistant Tools on Students' Engagement and Critical Thinking in Curriculum Learning in University of Port Harcourt

Faith Chinenye Okoye , Harriet Akudo Agbarakwe

Abstract

The rapid integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-powered assistant tools into higher education has generated significant scholarly interest, particularly regarding their influence on student engagement and the development of critical thinking skills. This study investigated the influence of AI-powered assistant tools on students' engagement and critical thinking in curriculum learning within the Faculty of Education, University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria. The study adopted a descriptive survey research design; the study targeted a population of 1,406 students from the 2022 and 2023 academic sets. A sample of 343 respondents was selected through purposive, simple random, and proportional stratified random sampling techniques. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire titled (IAATSECQ) with eight items each. Also, an AI- assisted quiz was administered via Google Forms. The reliability of the instrument using Cronbach’s alpha was 0.751. Descriptive statistics (mean and standard deviation) were used to answer research questions, while independent samples t-tests were employed to test the hypotheses at a 0.05 significance level. Findings revealed that AI-powered tools significantly enhanced students' engagement. Gender was found to significantly influence engagement (z = 2.985, p = 0.003), with female students demonstrating higher engagement levels. Age significantly influenced critical thinking (z = 5.365, p = 0.000), with younger students (18–25 years) recording higher critical thinking scores than older students (26–35 years). The study concludes that AI-powered assistant tools are effective instruments for enhancing academic engagement and critical thinking in Nigerian higher education, and recommends the institutionalization of AI literacy programmes and differentiated AI integration strategies that are responsive to students' gender and age characteristics.

Keywords

AI-powered assistant toolsstudent engagementcritical thinkingcurriculum learningHigher Education (HE).

References

Adamopoulou, E., Antoniou, A., & Moussiades, L. (2020). An overview of chatbot technology. In IFIP International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Applications and Innovations (pp. 373–383). Springer, Cham. Adeyemi, T. O., & Olawale, B. E. (2023). AI-powered tools and critical thinking development among undergraduate students in Nigerian universities. African Journal of Educational Research, 12(1), 45–62. Adeyemi, B., & Olawale, S. (2023). Age group differences in critical thinking outcomes of AI- powered learning among education undergraduates in Southwest Nigeria. Journal of Educational Technology, 30(3), 211–229. Agbarakwe, H. U., & Chibueze, O. (2024). AI and LLMs in Nigeria’s higher education broadcasting system. Nigerian Journal of Educational Technology, 5(1), 23–41. Alabi, F. O., & Musa, S. (2023). Gender differences in AI tool adoption and academic engagement among education students in Nigerian federal universities. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 10(2), 88–104. Ali, Z., Ahmad, R., & Hussain, M. (2023). Critical thinking in the age of AI: Implications for higher education pedagogy. International Journal of Educational Innovation, 5(1), 12–28. Alqahtani, A. Y., & Rajkhan, A. A. (2020). E-learning critical success factors during the COVID-19 pandemic: A comprehensive analysis of e-learning managerial perspectives. Education Sciences, 10(9), 216. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10090216 Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman. Boateng, K., & Owusu, A. (2023). Age-related differences in critical engagement with AI tools among tertiary students in Ghana. Journal of African Higher Education Research, 8(3), 101–119. Chen, Y., & Xu, J. (2021). Gender differences in engagement with AI-powered learning tools in higher education. Computers & Education, 168, 104188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104188 Deng, J., Liu, X., & Zhang, K. (2023). AI-powered educational tools and cognitive engagement: Mechanisms and outcomes. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(2), 431–459. Du Boulay, B. (2000). Can we learn from ITSs? In G. Gauthier, C. Frasson, & K. VanLehn (Eds.), Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 47–58). Springer. Edtech. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. EdTech Magazine. Essel, K. (2021). Collaborative AI tools and critical discourse in education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(5), 893–915. Ezinne, C. J., & Saturday, O. E. (2022). Balancing AI and human pedagogical roles in Nigerian higher education. Journal of Education and Practice, 13(6), 55–67. Facione, P. A. (2015). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Insight Assessment. Fernandez, R. A., & Reyes, M. L. (2022). Mature students and AI-assisted learning: Patterns of critical engagement in Philippine higher education. Asia-Pacific Journal of Education, 42(1), 77–93. Fernandez, C., & Reyes, M. (2022). Age-related differences in how students use AI assistants to develop critical thinking in Philippine higher education. Asian Pacific Journal of Education, 42(3), 490–507. IJEE IJEE www.ijee.io Hennekeuser, L., Müller, C., & Röhl, T. (2024). Personalized AI in higher education: Adaptive pathways and learner outcomes. Education and Information Technologies, 29(1), 289– 314. Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266. Hooda, M., Rana, C., Dahiya, O., Rizwan, A., & Hossain, M. S. (2022). Artificial intelligence for assessment and feedback to enhance student success in higher education. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2022, 5215722. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5215722 Hwang, G.-J., Xie, H., Wah, B. W., & Gašević, D. (2020). Vision, challenges, roles and research issues of artificial intelligence in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 1, 100001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100001 Gaglo, P. (2021). AI-facilitated inquiry-based learning and critical thinking. Computers & Education, 170, 104220. Järvelä (2023). AI and student engagement: Personalization, collaboration, and flexibility. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(3), 720–740 Liu, Y., & Wang, F. (2022). Does age matter? AI tool influence on critical thinking across student age groups in Chinese universities. Journal of Educational Technology Research, 29(4), 780–799. Järvelä, S., Nguyen, A., & Hadwin, A. (2023). Human and AI collaboration for supporting self- regulated learning in education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(5), 1076– 1095. Kearsley, G., & Shneiderman, B. (1998). Engagement theory: A framework for technology- based teaching and learning. Educational Technology, 38(5), 20–23. Kim, H., & Park, J. (2022). AI-assisted learning and gender: A comparative study of motivation and classroom participation among Korean university students. Asia Pacific Education Review, 23(2), 319–334. Kearsley, G., & Shneiderman, B. (1998). Engagement theory: A framework for technology- based teaching and learning. Educational Technology, 38(5), 20–23. Li, X., & Wong, Y. (2023). Responsible AI use in education: Frameworks for ethical implementation. Journal of Digital Learning and Teaching, 9(2), 34–50. Liu, F., & Wang, H. (2022). Age, AI tool usage, and critical thinking in Chinese universities: A mixed-methods study. Educational Research Review, 35, 100421. Ma, L., Han, X., & Wang, J. (2023). AI tools and student academic engagement: Mechanisms of persistent participation and reduced anxiety. Learning and Instruction, 84, 101699. Okonkwo, C., & Adekunle, P. (2022). Gender, purpose, and depth of AI tool use in Nigerian higher education: A mixed-methods study. Journal of Technology in African Education, 4(1), 22–39. Okonkwo, C., & Adekunle, T. (2022). AI-assisted learning and gender-based engagement patterns among university students in Nigeria. Journal of African Education, 14(2), 78– 96. Oyebola, F. (2024). AI-driven personalized learning and student engagement: A systematic review. Computers & Education: AI, 6, 100189. Ouyang, F., & Jiao, P. (2021). Artificial intelligence in education: The three paradigms. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100020 IJEE IJEE www.ijee.io Oyebola, O., Adeyemi, K., & Lawal, R. (2024). AI-enhanced classroom environments and student participation in Nigerian tertiary institutions. Nigerian Journal of Educational Technology, 7(1), 14–31. Pham, T., & Le, V. (2023). Female students' cognitive engagement with AI learning assistants: The role of feedback quality. Computers in Human Behavior, 139, 107527. Rashid, S., & Bhatti, U. (2021). AI-supported learning and critical thinking outcomes among older and younger university students in Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Educational Research, 4(2), 113–130. Rashid, S., & Bhatti, N. (2021). Age as a factor in AI tool adoption and critical thinking development among university students in Pakistan. Educational Technology & Society, 24(4), 180–196. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. Russell, S. J., & Norvig, P. (2021). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach (4th ed.). Pearson. Selwyn, N. (2019). Should robots replace teachers? AI and the future of education. Polity Press. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. Wang, T., Li, Y., & Zhou, Q. (2025). AI-driven learning platforms and higher-order thinking: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 62(3), 554–582. Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education—where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0

More Articles from INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EDUCATION AND EVALUATION