Submit your papersSubmit Now
For Enquiries: [email protected]
IIARD LogoIIARD

Management Accounting in the Circular Economy: Developing A Resource Efficiency Measurement Framework Through The Integration of Stakeholder Theory and Institutional Theory

Pham Thi Hop Tran Huyen Thu

Abstract

The transition to a circular economy has become a defining economic imperative, yet the global circularity rate has fallen rather than risen, revealing a persistent gap between ambition and firm- level realisation. Part of this gap is infrastructural: conventional management accounting was designed for a linear model and treats material losses as waste to be expensed rather than as value to be recovered, rendering the benefits of resource efficiency invisible. Existing environmental management accounting tools, such as material flow cost accounting, have developed in a fragmented, technical register and lack an integrated theoretical foundation explaining why and for whom firms measure resource efficiency. Adopting a desk-research methodology grounded in the synthesis, analysis, comparison, and evaluation of academic, standard-setting, and policy literature, this study develops a dual-lens measurement framework that integrates stakeholder theory and institutional theory. Stakeholder theory specifies the endogenous demand for measurement transmitted through investors, customers, and communities, while institutional theory characterises the exogenous coercive, normative, and mimetic pressures that compel and align measurement practice. The proposed three-tier framework links these dual drivers to a structured set of resource-efficiency indicators and, in turn, to circular strategic decision-making and organisational legitimacy, yielding three research propositions calibrated to the Vietnamese context. The paper contributes a theoretically integrated foundation for circular management accounting; its principal limitation is that the framework awaits empirical validation.

Keywords

management accounting; circular economy; resource efficiency; stakeholder theory; institutional theory; measurement framework

References

Christ, K. L., & Burritt, R. L. (2015). Material flow cost accounting: A review and agenda for future research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, 1378–1389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.005 Circle Economy. (2025). The circularity gap report 2025. Circle Economy Foundation. https://www.circularity-gap.world/2025 DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147– 160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101 Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman. Marrucci, L., Daddi, T., & Iraldo, F. (2023). Institutional and stakeholder pressures on organisational performance and green human resources management. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(1), 324–341. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2357 Nishitani, K., Kokubu, K., Wu, Q., Kitada, H., Guenther, E., & Guenther, T. (2022). Material flow cost accounting for the circular economy: An empirical study of the triadic relationship between MFCA, environmental performance, and the economic performance of Japanese companies. Journal of Environmental Management, 303, 114219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114219 Tran, T. Y. A., Herat, S., & Kaparaju, P. (2025). Current status and compliance management of EPR regulations for packaging waste in Vietnam. Circular Economy and Sustainability, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-025-00568-6 Vietnam Metal Recycling Foundation. (2025, July 30). Extended producer responsibility in Vietnam: Legal framework, implementation, and stakeholder engagement. https://vmrf.vn/en/extended-producer-responsibility-epr-in-vietnam-legal-framework- implementation-and-stakeholder-engagement-836

More Articles from INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES AND MANAGEMENT RESEARCH