Submit your papersSubmit Now
For Enquiries: [email protected]
IIARD LogoIIARD

Accessism: A Theory of Access-Centered Inclusion and Social Equity

Bar. Odinakachukwu Emmanuel Okeke, Chidiebere Emmanuel Okonkwo, Nweke, James Nnamdi, Ph.D, Bar. Chugbo Chukwudi Onyinye

Abstract

Accessism is a contemporary epistemological theory that foregrounds accessibility as the foundational condition for knowledge formation. Traditional approaches to epistemology have predominantly focused on internal cognitive mechanisms such as belief, justification, and truth, often overlooking the structural preconditions necessary for individuals to engage with knowledge. Accessism addresses this gap by emphasizing that knowledge is contingent upon the ability to access sources, encounter information, and participate in evaluative processes. The theory introduces a layered model of knowledge formation, tracing the progression from sources through accessibility, exposure, cognitive processing, belief formation, and justification, culminating in knowledge. By highlighting the structural, cultural, technological, and institutional factors that enable or constrain epistemic engagement, Accessism offers a framework for understanding and addressing epistemic inequality. This paper outlines the theoretical foundations of Accessism, illustrates its practical applications in education, healthcare, governance, and social life, and presents normative recommendations for promoting knowledge equity. Ultimately, Accessism redefines epistemology as a discipline concerned not only with individual cognition but also with the social and structural conditions that make knowledge attainable, providing a roadmap for inclusive and socially just knowledge production.

References

Adler, R. F., & Kletenik, D. (2025). Empowering access: Integrating multiple means of engagement when teaching accessible design principles. Education and Information Technologies, 30(9), 12661-12680. Anand, D., & Khemchandani, V. (2019). Identity and access management systems. Security and Privacy of Electronic Healthcare Records: Concepts, Paradigms and Solutions, 61. Arias, E. (2019). How does media influence social norms? Experimental evidence on the role of common knowledge. Political Science Research and Methods, 7(3), 561-578. Bal, A., Waitoller, F. R., Mawene, D., & Gorham, A. (2021). Culture, context, and disability: A systematic literature review of cultural-historical activity theory-based studies on the teaching and learning of students with disabilities. Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies, 43(4), 293-337. Barton, S. J. (2021). Access and disability justice in theological education. Journal of Disability & Religion, 25(3), 279-295. BEHERA, N. P. (2022). Foundationalism and Coherentism in Epistemology: A Critical Study University of Hyderabad]. Cohen, N., & Garasic, M. D. (2024). Informed ignorance as a form of epistemic injustice. Philosophies, 9(3), 59. Felder, F. (2025). Bridging the gap between knowledge and justice: Epistemic challenges in participatory disability research. Theory and Research in Education, 23(3), 268-283. Galesic, M., Olsson, H., Dalege, J., Van Der Does, T., & Stein, D. L. (2021). Integrating social and cognitive aspects of belief dynamics: towards a unifying framework. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 18(176). Gettier, E. (2020). Is justified true belief knowledge? In Arguing about knowledge (pp. 14-15). Routledge. Goldman, A. (2025). Reliabilism. A companion to epistemology, 1, 367-375. Goldman, A. I. (2019). The what, why, and how of social epistemology. In The Routledge handbook of social epistemology (pp. 10-20). Routledge. Greco, G. M. (2018). The nature of accessibility studies. Journal of Audiovisual Translation, 1(1), 205-232. Grenon, M. M., Ruel, J., Fougeyrollas, P., Normand, C. L., Moreau, A. C., Romero-Torres, A., & Gravel, S. (2023). Conceptualizing access to and understanding of information. Universal Access in the Information Society, 22(1), 83-94. Hamati-Ataya, I. (2018). The sociology of knowledge as postphilosophical epistemology: Out of IR’s “socially constructed” idealism. International Studies Review, 20(1), 3-29. Hannon, M. (2021). Skepticism, fallibilism, and rational evaluation. In Skeptical invariantism reconsidered (pp. 172-194). Routledge. Horsthemke, K. (2021). Diversity and epistemic marginalisation: The case of inclusive education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 40(6), 549-565. Kay, L. (2019). Guardians of research: negotiating the strata of gatekeepers in research with vulnerable participants. Practice, 1(1), 37-52. Klahr, D., & Wallace, J. G. (2022). Cognitive development: An information-processing view. Taylor & Francis. Morgan, D. L. (2020). Pragmatism as a basis for grounded theory. The Qualitative Report, 25(1), 64. Moyaert, M. (2019). Interreligious hermeneutics, prejudice, and the problem of testimonial injustice. Religious Education, 114(5), 609-623. IJEE IJEE www.ijee.io Ogar, T. E., Akiba, E., & Aboka, G. (2025). The Limits of Human Knowledge: A Critical Examination of Skepticism and Foundationalism in Epistemology. Advances in Law, Pedagogy, and Multidisciplinary Humanities, 3(1), 336-354. Phillips, J., Buckwalter, W., Cushman, F., Friedman, O., Martin, A., Turri, J., Santos, L., & Knobe, J. (2021). Knowledge before belief. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 44, e140. Rachmad, Y. E. (2022). Adaptive learning theory. In: La Paz Costanera Publicaciones Internacionales. Rachmad, Y. E. (2025). Social constructivism theory. United Nations Economic and Social Council. Rowett, C. (2018). Knowledge and truth in Plato: Stepping past the shadow of Socrates. Oxford university press. Sarkar, R., & Parween, S. (2021). Disability and exclusion: social, education and employment perspectives. Bhutan Journal of Research and Development, 10(2), 29-47. Schulz, H. (2020). Changing one’s mind: Reconsidering Fisch’s idea of framework transitions in Kierkegaardian fashion. Open Philosophy, 3(1), 750-769. Syafaruddin, S., Mappisabbi, A. F., Aliyah, N., & Syafaruddin, A. R. A. (2023). The Influence Of Civic Knowledge, Civil Skills, And Citizen Involvement On Legal Awareness Among Students. International Journal of Education and Literature, 2(2), 14-20. Wolf, A. (2020). ‘One Size Fits All’–A Default Policy that is Serving No One Well. European Review, 28(S1), S28-S43.

More Articles from INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EDUCATION AND EVALUATION