Improvisational Behavior as A Strategic Tool: Examining Its Impact on Innovation and Performance in Resource-Constrained Environments

Umar Bobboi; Yakubu Bala; Saad Abubakar

doi:10.56201/wjeds.v11.no3.2026

📄 Download Paper

Improvisational Behavior as A Strategic Tool: Examining Its Impact on Innovation and Performance in Resource-Constrained Environments

Umar Bobboi, Yakubu Bala, Saad Abubakar

Abstract

This study examines improvisational behavior as a strategic tool in SMEs, focusing on its capacity to transform resource constraints into innovation and improved firm performance in Northern Nigeria. The aim is to investigate how improvisation mediates the relationship between resource limitations, innovation, and organizational outcomes. Specifically, the study seeks to: (i) determine the relationship between resource constraints and improvisational behavior; (ii) assess the mediating role of improvisation between constraints and innovation; and evaluate its effect on firm performance. The research is anchored on Bricolage Theory, which emphasizes the creative recombination of available resources under constraints. A sequential mixed-methods design was adopted. Quantitative data were collected from 300 SME managers and employees across Kano, Kaduna, and Plateau States and analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling . This was complemented by qualitative case studies involving semi-structured interviews with 10 participants from five SMEs to enrich contextual understanding. Findings reveal a significant positive relationship between resource constraints and improvisational behavior. Improvisation fully mediates the link between constraints and innovation and directly enhances firm performance. Qualitative results further highlight leadership support, tolerance for failure, and effective internal communication as key enablers. The study concludes that improvisational behavior is not disorderly but a vital strategic capability that enables firms to convert limitations into competitive advantage. It is recommended that managers foster flexible cultures, encourage experimentation, and strengthen communication systems, while policymakers should support capacity-building initiatives for SMEs.

Keywords

Improvisational behaviorResource constraintsInnovationFirm performanceSMEs.

References

Baker, T., & Nelson, R. E. (2005). Creating something from nothing: Resource constructionthrough entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 32–366. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2005.50.3.329 Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. Crossan, M. M., & Sorrenti, M. (1997). Making sense of improvisation. In A. Huff & J. Walsh (Eds.), Advances in strategic management (Vol. 14, pp. 155–180). JAI Press. Crossan, M. M., Lane, H. W., & White, R. E. (1999). An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 522 –537. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.2202135 Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments. Academy of Management Journal, 32(3), 543–576. https://doi.org/10.5465/256434 Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39 –50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104 Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Publications. Lévi-Strauss, C. (1966). The savage mind. University of Chicago Press. Miner, A. S. (2003). Organizational improvisation and learning: A field study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 304–318. https://doi.org/10.2307/3556656 Miner, A. S., Bassoff, P., & Moorman, C. (2001). Organizational improvisation and learning: A field study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(2), 304 –337. https://doi.org/10.2307/2667084 Mintzberg, H., & Waters, J. A. (1985). Of strategies, deliberate and emergent. Strategic Management Journal, 6(3), 257–272. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250060306 Moorman, C., & Miner, A. S. (1998). The convergence of planning and execution: Improvisation in new product development. Journal of Marketing, 62(3), 1– 20. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299806200301 National Bureau of Statistics . (2020). Micro, small and medium enterprises survey report. National Bureau of Statistics, Nigeria. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509– 533. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID- SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z Venkatraman, N., & Ramanujam, V. (1986). Measurement of business performance in strategy research: A comparison of approaches. Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 801 –814. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1986.4283976 Vera, D., & Crossan, M. (2005). Improvisation and innovative performance in teams. Organization Science, 16(3), 203–224. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0126 Wang, C. L., & Ahmed, P. K. (2004). The development and validation of the organisational innovativeness construct using confirmatory factor analysis. European Journal of Innovation Management, 7(4), 303–313. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060410565056 Weick, K. E. (1993). The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: The Mann Gulch disaster. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(4), 628– 652. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393339

Improvisational Behavior as A Strategic Tool: Examining Its Impact on Innovation and Performance in Resource-Constrained Environments

Abstract

Keywords

References

More Articles from WORLD JOURNAL OF ENTREPRENEURIAL DEVELOPMENT STUDIES