Submit your papersSubmit Now
For Enquiries: [email protected]
IIARD LogoIIARD

Assessment of the Availability and Utilization of Virtual Laboratory on Academic Performance of Senior Secondary School Biology Students in Adamawa State, Nigeria

Monica Goji PhD.

Abstract

The study examined the availability and utilisation of virtual laboratories and their influence on the academic performance of senior secondary school Biology students in Adamawa State, Nigeria. The continuous decline and inconsistency in students’ performance in Biology within the state have become a major concern for educators and stakeholders. As a subject that is largely practical in nature, Biology requires effective laboratory experiences to facilitate the understanding of abstract concepts and the development of scientific skills. The study was guided by a single objective, which focused on determining the availability and utilisation of virtual laboratories in relation to students’ academic performance. To achieve this, one research question and a corresponding hypothesis were formulated. A quasi-experimental research design was adopted, with the population comprising all SS II students offering Biology practical General Murtala Muhammed College Yola, Adamawa State, Nigeria. The sample for the study consisted of 167 students who were grouped into three categories. Data were collected using an instrument known as the Biology Practical Performance and Retention Test. The data obtained were analysed using mean and standard deviation to answer the research question, while paired and independent sample t-tests were applied to test the hypothesis at the 0.05 level of significance. The results revealed that the utilisation of virtual laboratories significantly enhances the academic performance of senior secondary school Biology students in Adamawa State, Nigeria. Based on these findings, the study concluded that the effective use of virtual laboratories plays a crucial role in improving students’ academic achievement in Biology. In view of this conclusion, it was recommended that government and relevant educational stakeholders should prioritise the provision and expansion of virtual laboratory facilities in secondary schools to improve students’ access to interactive and practical learning experiences. Additionally, continuous training programmes should be organised for Biology teachers to strengthen their capacity to integrate and effectively utilise virtual laboratories in classroom instruction. Key Words: Virtual Laboratory, Academic Performance, Biology Students, Adamawa State

Keywords

Virtual LaboratoryAcademic PerformanceBiology StudentsAdamawa State

References

Adeyemo, S. A. (2010). The impact of information and communication technology on teaching and learning of physics. International Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 1(2), 48–59. Aduwa-Ogiegbaen, S. E. (2009). Nigerian in-service teachers’ self-assessment in core technology competences. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 15(2), 12–20. Ajayi, V. O. (2021). Effect of virtual laboratory on students’ achievement in biology. Journal of Science Education and Practice, 5(1), 22–34. Bello, A. (2016). Resource allocation and academic performance in secondary schools in North- East Nigeria. Journal of Educational Management, 10(3), 67–81. Brinson, J. R. (2015). Learning outcome achievement in non-traditional (virtual and remote) versus traditional laboratories: A review of the empirical research. Computers & Education, 87, 218–237. Brinson, J. R. (2015). Learning outcome achievement in non-traditional (virtual and remote) versus traditional laboratories: A review of the empirical research. , 218–237. Clark, R. C. (2016). E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. Educational Technology Research Journal, 64(3), 349–367. Daramola, F. O. (2022). Digital learning tools and students’ academic performance in Nigeria. Journal of Contemporary Educational Studies, 14(2), 88–102. de Jong, T. (2019). Advances in computer-based learning environments for science education. Educational Psychologist, 54(4), 253–267. Ertmer, P. A. (2015). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63(2), 255–271. Ezeudu, S. A. (2013). Laboratory resources and science education in Nigeria. African Journal of Science Education, 7(1), 45–59. Fosnot, C. T. (2013). Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice. Teachers College Record, 115(3), 1–24. Hofstein, A. (2013). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education International, 24(4), 365–378. Jegede, O. J. (2013). Technology and science education in developing countries. International Journal of Science Education, 35(16), 2807–2825 Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist approaches. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86. Lawal, B. O. (2016). Teacher professional development and ICT utilisation in Nigerian schools. Journal of Teacher Education, 9(1), 55–70. Makransky, G. (2021). Virtual simulations and learning effectiveness in science education. Educational Psychology Review, 33(2), 507–531 Mayer, R. E. (2020). Multimedia learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. Merchant, Z. (2014). Effectiveness of virtual reality-based instruction on students’ learning outcomes in K–12 and higher education: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 70, 29–40. Mohammed, I. (2018). Educational disparities in North-East Nigeria. Journal of Educational Policy and Development, 12(1), 90–105. IJEE IJEE www.ijee.io Ogunlade, O. O. (2017). Challenges of ICT integration in Nigerian secondary schools. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 45(4), 567–584. Okebukola, P. (2020). Science education in Nigeria: Challenges and prospects. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(6), 867–890. Olaitan, S. O. (2015). Educational technology and science instruction in developing countries. International Journal of Educational Development, 40, 123–130. Olorundare, A. S. (2014). Theory and practice of science teaching. Ibadan: University Press. Phillips, D. C. (1995). The good, the bad, and the ugly: The many faces of constructivism. Educational Researcher, 24(7), 5–12 Piaget, J. (1936). The origins of intelligence in children. International Journal of Psychology, 1(1), 1–15. Rutten, N. (2012). The learning effects of computer simulations in science education. Computers & Education, 58(1), 136–153. Rutten, N. (2012). The learning effects of computer simulations in science education. Computers & Education, 58(1), 136–153. Scherer, R. (2019). Students’ technology acceptance and learning outcomes in educational settings. Computers & Education, 128, 13–29. Schneider, M., & Preckel, F. (2017). Variables associated with achievement in higher education: A systematic review of meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 143(6), 565–600. Smetana, L. K. (2012). Computer simulations to support science instruction and learning: A critical review. International Journal of Science Education, 34(9), 1337–1370 Tella, A. (2019). ICT and secondary school education in Africa: Issues and challenges. African Journal of Library and Information Science, 29(1), 1–15. Unwin, T. (2017). Reframing the digital divide in education. Learning, Media and Technology, 42(2), 148–162. York, T. T., Gibson, C., & Rankin, S. (2015). Defining and measuring academic success. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 20(5), 1–20. Yusuf, M. O. (2018). Information and communication technology and education in Nigeria. Journal of Educational Media and Technology, 22(3), 45–59.

More Articles from INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EDUCATION AND EVALUATION