Submit your papersSubmit Now
For Enquiries: [email protected]
IIARD LogoIIARD

School Inclusion and EU Policies For Students With Special Educational Needs

Andrea Capaldo Giliberti, Emma Saraiello

Abstract

The school inclusion of students with disabilities and specific learning disorders represents one of the most complex structural challenges for the educational systems of the European Union. This article analyzes the cohesion and convergence policies developed by the EU to promote equity in education, with particular attention to the legal and financial instruments activated during the 2021–2027 period. Through a critical review of scientific literature and the most recent institutional documents, the main regulatory frameworks are examined—including the European Union Strategy for the Rights of Persons with Disabilities 2021–2030 and the regulations governing the European Social Fund Plus (ESF+)—as well as the resulting pedagogical interventions. The analysis highlights recurring tensions between supranational institutional mandates and national teaching practices, emphasizing how the training of support teachers and the dissemination of differentiated approaches remain determining factors for the effectiveness of inclusive processes. The findings indicate that European policies produce tangible but heterogeneous effects, requiring greater integration between multi-level governance and classroom practices.

Keywords

school inclusion; EU Policies; Special Educational Needs

References

framework. www.ijee.io Neuropsychological research and pedagogical literature already provide solid empirical bases for developing such guidelines (Snowling & Melby-Lervåg, 2016; Fletcher et al., 2019). Inclusive pedagogy, in its various forms—UDL, differentiated instruction, co-teaching, Response to Intervention—offers a repertoire of evidence-based practices that European policies should contribute to disseminating more systematically, through initial and ongoing teacher training, funding longitudinal research, and building stable international professional networks. The lesson emerging from the scientific literature is clear: cohesion policies are necessary but not sufficient. Without deep engagement from school communities, without a culture of inclusion permeating teachers’ daily practices, without recognition of the centrality of the educational relationship as the locus where learning quality is determined, European resources risk producing bureaucratic compliance rather than authentic transformation (Florian, 2019; Ainscow, 2020). In light of this analysis, there emerges a need for reflection on the very model of European education governance. The open method of coordination, based on voluntariness and the sharing of good practices, shows its structural limits in a context where inequalities between national and regional school systems are deep and persistent (Armstrong et al., 2011). Strengthening monitoring and accountability mechanisms, combined with strategic investment in comparative research on inclusion and greater conditionality of financial interventions with respect to minimum pedagogical quality standards, could help bridge part of this gap. This does not call for European centralization in education—which is excluded by the Treaties and difficult to justify in terms of democratic legitimacy—but rather for building stronger coherence between declared objectives, available instruments, and actual practices. In this context, pedagogy and educational research have an indispensable role—not as technical knowledge serving predefined policies, but as critical disciplines capable of interrogating policies themselves and guiding them toward a fuller, more coherent, and more equitable conception of inclusion. www.ijee.io References Ainscow, M. (2020). Promoting inclusion and equity in education: Lessons from international experiences. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 6(1), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2020.1729587 Anastasiou, D., & Kauffman, J. M. (2013). The social model of disability: Dichotomy between impairment and disability. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 38(4), 441–459. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jht026 Armstrong, D., Armstrong, A. C., & Spandagou, I. (2011). Inclusion: By choice or by chance? International Journal of Inclusive Education, 15(1), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2010.496192 Avramidis, E., & Norwich, B. (2002). Teachers' attitudes towards integration/inclusion: A review of the literature. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 17(2), 129–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856250210129056 Booth, T., & Ainscow, M. (2011). Index for inclusion: Developing learning and participation in schools (3rd ed.). Centre for Studies on Inclusive Education. CAST. (2018). Universal Design for Learning guidelines version 2.2. http://udlguidelines.cast.org Consiglio dell'Unione Europea. (2021). Risoluzione del Consiglio su un quadro strategico per la cooperazione europea nel settore dell'istruzione e della formazione verso lo Spazio europeo dell'istruzione e oltre (2021-2030). Gazzetta Ufficiale dell'Unione Europea, C 66/1. Cottini, L. (2017). Didattica speciale e inclusione scolastica. Carocci. de Boer, A., Pijl, S. J., & Minnaert, A. (2011). Regular primary schoolteachers' attitudes towards inclusive education: A review of the literature. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 15(3), 331–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603110903030089 EASNIE. (2021). Key principles – Supporting policy development and implementation for inclusive education. European Agency for Special Needs and Inclusive Education. https://www.european-agency.org/resources/publications/key-principles-supporting- policy-development-and-implementation-inclusive EASNIE. (2022). Country information for Italy – Teacher education for inclusion. European Agency for Special Needs and Inclusive Education. https://www.european- agency.org/country-information/italy/teacher-education-for-inclusion EASNIE. (2023). European Agency statistics on inclusive education: 2021/2022 school year dataset cross-country report. European Agency for Special Needs and Inclusive Education. https://www.european-agency.org/resources/publications/EASIE-2021- 2022-CCR European Commission. (2020). Digital Education Action Plan 2021-2027: Resetting education and training for the digital age (COM[2020] 624 final). Publications Office of the European Union. European Commission. (2021a). Union of equality: Strategy for the rights of persons with disabilities 2021-2030 (COM[2021] 101 final). Publications Office of the European Union. European Commission. (2021b). The European Pillar of Social Rights Action Plan. Publications Office of the European Union. European Commission/EACEA/Eurydice. (2021). Teachers in Europe: Careers, development and well-being (Eurydice Report). Publications Office of the European Union. European Commission/EACEA/Eurydice. (2023). Promoting diversity and inclusion in schools in Europe (Eurydice Report). Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2797/385198 www.ijee.io Fletcher, J. M., Lyon, G. R., Fuchs, L. S., & Barnes, M. A. (2019). Learning disabilities: From identification to intervention (2nd ed.). Guilford Press. Florian, L. (2019). On the necessary co-existence of special and inclusive education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 23(7–8), 691–704. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2019.1622801 Florian, L., & Black-Hawkins, K. (2011). Exploring inclusive pedagogy. British Educational Research Journal, 37(5), 813–828. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411926.2010.501096 Forlin, C. (Ed.). (2010). Teacher education for inclusion: Changing paradigms and innovative approaches. Routledge. Friend, M., & Cook, L. (2017). Interactions: Collaboration skills for school professionals (8th ed.). Pearson. Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge. Ianes, D., Demo, H., & Dell'Anna, S. (2020). Inclusive education in Italy: Historical steps, positive developments, and challenges. Prospects, 49(3–4), 249–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-020-09509-7 Messiou, K. (2017). Research in the field of inclusive education: Time for a rethink? International Journal of Inclusive Education, 21(2), 146–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2016.1223184 Murawski, W. W., & Swanson, H. L. (2001). A meta-analysis of co-teaching research: Where are the data? Remedial and Special Education, 22(5), 258–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193250102200501 OECD. (2023). Education at a glance 2023: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/e13bef63-en Parlamento Europeo e Consiglio dell'Unione Europea. (2021a). Regolamento (UE) 2021/1057 che istituisce il Fondo Sociale Europeo Plus (FSE+). Gazzetta Ufficiale dell'Unione Europea, L 231/21. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal- content/IT/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32021R1057 Parlamento Europeo e Consiglio dell'Unione Europea. (2021b). Regolamento (UE) 2021/1058 relativo al Fondo europeo di sviluppo regionale e al Fondo di coesione. Gazzetta Ufficiale dell'Unione Europea, L 231/60. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal- content/IT/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32021R1058 Parlamento Europeo e Consiglio dell'Unione Europea. (2021c). Regolamento (UE) 2021/1060 recante le disposizioni comuni applicabili ai fondi strutturali europei. Gazzetta Ufficiale dell'Unione Europea, L 231/159. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal- content/IT/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32021R1060 Reid, G. (2016). Dyslexia: A practitioner's handbook (5th ed.). Wiley. Rose, R., & Shevlin, M. (2017). A sense of belonging: Children's views of acceptance in the primary school environment. International Journal of Whole Schooling, 13(1), 65–80. Sharma, U., Forlin, C., & Loreman, T. (2008). Impact of training on pre-service teachers' attitudes and concerns about inclusive education and sentiments about persons with disability. Disability & Society, 23(7), 773–785. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687590802469271 Slee, R. (2018). Defining the scope of inclusive education. Think piece prepared for the 2020 Global Education Monitoring Report. UNESCO. Snowling, M. J., & Melby-Lervåg, M. (2016). Oral language deficits in familial dyslexia: A meta-analysis and review. Psychological Bulletin, 142(5), 498–545. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000037 Stella, G., & Grandi, L. (2011). Come leggere la dislessia e i DSA. Giunti Scuola. www.ijee.io Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners (2nd ed.). ASCD. Tomlinson, C. A., & Imbeau, M. B. (2010). Leading and managing a differentiated classroom. ASCD. Trattato sul Funzionamento dell'Unione Europea [TFUE]. (2012). Versione consolidata. Gazzetta Ufficiale dell'Unione Europea, C 326/47. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal- content/IT/TXT/?uri=CELEX:12012E/TXT UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. (2016). General Comment No. 4 (2016): Article 24 – Right to inclusive education (CRPD/C/GC/4). United Nations. https://www.ohchr.org/en/documents/general-comments-and- recommendations/general-comment-no-4-article-24-right-inclusive UNESCO. (1994). The Salamanca Statement and Framework for Action on Special Needs Education. UNESCO. UNESCO. (2020). Global Education Monitoring Report 2020: Inclusion and education – All means all. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54676/jjnk6989 Unione Europea. (2000). Carta dei diritti fondamentali dell'Unione europea. Gazzetta Ufficiale delle Comunità europee, C 364/1. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/charter/pdf/text_it.pdf United Nations. (2006). Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/convention-rights- persons-disabilities Villa, R. A., Thousand, J. S., & Nevin, A. I. (2013). A guide to co-teaching: New lessons and strategies to facilitate student learning (3rd ed.). Corwin Press. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

More Articles from INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EDUCATION AND EVALUATION