Submit your papersSubmit Now
For Enquiries: [email protected]
IIARD LogoIIARD

The Influence of Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Metrics on The Financial Performance of Multinational Corporations

Olaiya Abiodun Lukman, Omotosho, Gbenga Oluyemi & Jimoh Nurudeen A.

Abstract

In an era of heightened global awareness regarding sustainability and corporate responsibility, the influence of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics on corporate financial performance has become a paramount concern for investors, regulators, and corporate leaders. This study empirically investigates the impact of ESG metrics, specifically environmental performance, social responsibility, and corporate governance, on the financial performance of multinational corporations (MNCs). Drawing upon Stakeholder Theory, Legitimacy Theory, and the Resource-Based View (RBV), this research posits that strong ESG performance positively influences financial outcomes. A quantitative research design was employed, analyzing archival data from 350 MNCs listed on major global indices over a five-year period (2020-2024). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Pearson Correlation, and Panel Data Regression Analysis. The findings reveal that all three ESG components, environmental performance, social responsibility, and corporate governance, are significant positive predictors of financial performance, as measured by Return on Assets (ROA) and Tobin’s Q. Specifically, corporate governance emerged as the most significant predictor for ROA (β=0.385, p<0.001), underscoring its critical role in enhancing operational efficiency and accountability. Environmental performance was the most influential factor for Tobin’s Q (β=0.412, p<0.001), highlighting its importance in shaping long-term market valuation and investor confidence. The regression models explained a significant portion of the variance in ROA (Adjusted R²=0.695) and Tobin’s Q (Adjusted R²=0.723). This study concludes that while ESG initiatives require investment, their strategic implementation is associated with enhanced financial performance and long-term value creation. The results reinforce the theoretical frameworks, suggesting that integrating ESG considerations into core business strategy can lead to improved stakeholder relationships, enhanced reputation, and sustainable competitive advantage. Recommendations include the development of standardized ESG reporting frameworks, integration of ESG metrics into executive compensation, and proactive engagement with stakeholders on ESG issues.

Keywords

EnvironmentalSocialand Governance (ESG)Financial PerformanceMultinational Corporations (MNCs)Return on Assets (ROA)Tobin’s QStakeholder TheoryCorporate Governance

References

Ambec, S., & Lanoie, P. (2022). Does it pay to be green? A systematic review. Academy of Management Perspectives, 36(2), 185-209. Ameer, R., & Othman, R. (2012). Sustainability practices and corporate financial performance: A study of Malaysian public listed companies. Journal of Accounting and Auditing: Research & Practice, 1(1), 1-14. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120. Bebchuk, L. A., & Weisbach, M. S. (2010). The state of corporate governance research. Review of Financial Studies, 23(3), 939-943. Chung, K. H., & Pruitt, S. W. (1994). A simple approximation of Tobin's Q. Financial Management, 23(3), 70-74. Chuk, N. A. (2024). Financial performance and sustainability reporting in emerging markets. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 25(3), 45-68. Core, J. E., Guay, W. R., & Rusticus, T. O. (2022). Does weak governance cause weak stock returns? An examination of firm operating performance and investors' expectations. The Journal of Finance, 77(4), 1591-1634. Deegan, C. (2021). Legitimacy theory: A story of reporting social and environmental matters. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 34(8), 1-28. Deegan, C., Gordon, B., & Russell, S. (2002). Environmental disclosure by Australian companies: A note on the effect of industry, size, and other variables. Accounting and Business Research, 32(4), 193-207. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65-91. Dowling, J., & Pfeffer, J. (1975). Organizational legitimacy: Social values and organizational behavior. Pacific Sociological Review, 18(1), 122-136. Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2024). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 70(11), 6589-6609. Eccles, R. G., Serafeim, G., & Ioannou, I. (2011). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Harvard Business School Working Paper No. 12-035.Edmans, A. (2023). Does the stock market fully value intangibles? Employee satisfaction and equity prices. Journal of Financial Economics, 148(1), 1-21. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman. Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, S., & de Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge University Press. Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), 210-233. Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2025). ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 15(4), 210-233. Gillan, S. L., Koch, A., & Starks, L. T. (2021). Firms and social responsibility: A review of ESG and CSR research in corporate finance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 66, 101889. Guo, M., Zhao, W., Zhou, Z., & Gao, D. (2021). The impact of environmental performance on corporate financial performance: A mediating effect model. Sustainability, 13(10), 5434.Hart, S. L., & Dowell, G. (2023). A natural-resource-based view of the firm: Fifteen years after. Journal of Management, 49(5), 1464-1486. Jensen, M. C. (2001). Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 14(3), 8-21. Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 404-437. Lindblom, C. K. (1993). The role of environmental reporting in organizational legitimation. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 18(8), 693-709. Luo, X., & Tang, Z. (2016). The impact of corporate social responsibility on firm performance: The moderating role of environmental management systems. Journal of Business Ethics, 138(4), 743-762. Margolis, J. D., Elfenbein, H. A., & Walsh, J. P. (2021). Does it pay to be good...and does it matter? A meta-analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Harvard Business School. Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 268-305. Neville, B. A., Bell, S. J., & Menguc, B. (2021). The role of social responsibility and ethical conduct in building brand loyalty. Journal of Marketing Management, 37(11-12), 1279- 1303. Penrose, E. T. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. John Wiley & Sons. Peteraf, M. A. (1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14(3), 179-191. Ramanathan, R. (2021). The role of environmental performance in firm value: a meta-analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 280, 124391.Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571-610. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533. Wang, H., Li, T., & Li, T. (2021). The impact of social responsibility on firm performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Business Research, 135, 84-96. Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171-180.

More Articles from JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

Cashflow Management and the Performance of Commercial Banks in Nigeria

Author: Jeffrey Ayas Iyakonbogha, Clement E. Ozele

The Nigerian Code of Corporate Governance and Financial Performance of Deposit Money Banks in Nigeria

Author: i, Eneaniofu Daniel Mmaduakonam, ii, Azolike Nkiru Nkechi, iii, Emeter Patrick Okechukwu, iv, Okwor Emmanuel Ejimnkonye