Explainable Fraud Detection AI System in Financial Sector

Merit Chinonso Opara; Isaac Nosakhare Agbonifo; Prisca Chimezie Opara; Nzubechi
Augustine Oriaku; Uchechi Joyce Nneji; Chibueze Favour Aririguzo; Onyedikachi
Williams Onwuso; Grace Ugochi Nneji

doi:10.56201/ijbfr.vol.12.no2.2026.pg86.147

Explainable Fraud Detection AI System in Financial Sector

Merit Chinonso Opara, Isaac Nosakhare Agbonifo, Prisca Chimezie Opara, Nzubechi Augustine Oriaku, Uchechi Joyce Nneji, Chibueze Favour Aririguzo, Onyedikachi Williams Onwuso, Grace Ugochi Nneji

Abstract

Digital payment services now handle millions of transactions each day, where even a tiny fraction of fraud causes major financial losses and undermines customer trust. This paper investigates how to accurately detect fraudulent transactions in a Kaggle financial payment services dataset and to understand which transaction behaviors make payments appear risky. The original dataset is pre-processed through outlier removal, label encoding, standardisation and two stages balancing strategy combining random down sampling of the majority class with SMOTE oversampling. Nine numeric and categorical features are then used as inputs to classifiers including LR, KNN, DT, RF, SVM, GNB, AdaBoost, Bagging, Voting and Stacking under four settings. They are no dimensionality reduction (NoDR), UMAP, NCA and PLS-DA respectively. Hyperparameters are tuned with GridSearchCV using both 70/30 train–test split and 10-fold cross-validation. Model performance is evaluated with accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, specificity, ROC-AUC, PR-AUC and training time. SHAP is applied to interpret feature importance and local decisions. Without dimensionality reduction Bagging, Random Forest and Stacking achieve 99.3 to 99.4% accuracy and F1, with ROC-AUC and PR-AUC close to 99.95% on the test set and similarly strong cross-validation scores. UMAP and NCA preserve high performance in lower dimensional spaces. While PLS-DA gives moderate but consistent results. The study shows that ensemble models on the original feature space provide highly accurate and stable fraud detection on this dataset. SHAP analysis reveals that source and destination balances, transaction amount and type are the most influential features.

Keywords

Digital PaymentFraud DetectionExplainable Artificial Intelligence Supervised Machine Learning

References

Credit card fraud detection: A realistic modeling and a novel learning strategy. (n.d.). Università della Svizzera italiana. Retrieved December 14, 2025, from https://search.usi.ch/en/publications/19357/credit-card-fraud-detection-a-realisticmodeling-and-a-novel-learning-strategy Anomaly detection in credit card transactions. (n.d.). Retrieved December 14, 2025, from https://www.meegle.com/en_us/topics/anomaly-detection/anomaly-detection-in-creditcard-transactions Lopez-Rojas, E., Elmir, A., & Axelsson, S. (2016). PaySim: A financial mobile money simulator for fraud detection. In Proceedings of the 28th European Modeling and Simulation Symposium (EMSS) (pp. 249–255). DIME University of Genoa. Retrieved December 14, 2025, from https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:bth-13651 Analysis and visualization of fraud detection patterns through data mining and classification using MLP and hybrid deep learning model. (2025). Alexandria Engineering Journal. Retrieved December 14, 2025, from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110866525002221 Abdallah, A., Maarof, M. A., & Zainal, A. B. (2016). Fraud detection system: A survey. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 68, 90–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2016.04.007 Roseline, J. F., Naidu, G., Samuthira Pandi, V., Alamelu alias Rajasree, S., & Mageswari, N. (2022). Autonomous credit card fraud detection using machine learning approach. Computers and Electrical Engineering, 102, 108132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2022.108132 Pumsirirat, A., & Yan, L. (2018). Credit card fraud detection using deep learning based on autoencoder and restricted Boltzmann machine. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2018.090103 Nordling, C. (2020). Anomaly detection in credit card transactions using autoencoders (Master’s thesis). KTH Royal Institute of Technology. Retrieved December 14, 2025, from https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-280818Credit card fraud detection method based on RF-WGAN-TCN. (2025). Information Sciences. Retrieved December 14, 2025, from https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/pii/S1546221825009270 Gupta, R. K., et al. (2025). Enhanced framework for credit card fraud detection using robust feature selection and a stacking ensemble model approach. Results in Engineering, 26, 105084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.105084 Jurgovsky, J., et al. (2018). Sequence classification for credit-card fraud detection. Expert Systems with Applications, 100, 234–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.01.037 Pumsirirat, A., & Yan, L. (2018). Credit card fraud detection using deep learning based on autoencoder and restricted Boltzmann machine. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2018.090103 Onyeoma, C. F., Rafiq, H., Jeremiah, D., Ta, V. T., & Usman, M. (2024). Credit card fraud detection using deep neural network with Shapley additive explanations. In 2024 International Conference on Frontiers of Information Technology (FIT) (pp. 1–6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIT63703.2024.10838456 Andrade-Arenas, L., & Yactayo-Arias, C. (2025). Comparative analysis of machine learning models for credit card fraud detection using SMOTE for class imbalance. International Journal of Safety and Security Engineering, 15(5), 893–901. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsse.150504

Explainable Fraud Detection AI System in Financial Sector

Abstract

Keywords

References

More Articles from IIARD INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BANKING AND FINANCE RESEARCH