Submit your papersSubmit Now
For Enquiries: [email protected]
IIARD LogoIIARD

Beyond Financial Ratios: An Analysis of Qualitative and Quantitative Factors Driving Management-Auditor Divergence in Going Concern Reporting

Samuel F. Johnson-Rokosu, Oluwayemi Olasoji Ezekiel

Abstract

This study examines the drivers of divergence between management’s going concern assertions and auditor opinions, moving beyond traditional reliance on quantitative financial ratios. We propose an integrated framework, grounded in agency theory and judgment decision-making, that incorporates qualitative factors. Using a sample of S&P 500 companies (2020–2023) and logistic regression analysis, we investigate the direct and interactive effects of weak corporate governance, low management credibility, and adverse market conditions. Results indicate that poor governance increases the likelihood of divergence by 47.1 percentage points per governance weakness, while low credibility increases it by 66.9 percentage points. Crucially, these qualitative factors act as powerful amplifiers, more than doubling the perceived risk of financial distress. Our findings underscore the necessity for holistic audit risk assessments that blend financial metrics with qualitative context, offering actionable insights for auditors, directors, and regulators to enhance judgment consistency and financial reporting integrity.

Keywords

Management-Auditor DivergenceGoing Concern ReportingQualitative FactorsCorporate GovernanceProfessional Skepticism

References

Altman, E. I. (1968). Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy. Journal of Finance, 23(4), 589–609. Bauer, T. D., Estep, C., & Hales, J. (2024). The persistence of reputational spillovers: Evidence from financial restatements and auditor skepticism. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 77(1), 101–125. Beaver, W. H. (1966). Financial ratios as predictors of failure. Journal of Accounting Research, 4, 71–111. Behn, B. K., Kaplan, S. E., & Krumwiede, K. R. (2001). Further evidence on the auditor’s going- concern report: The influence of management plans. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 20(1), 13–33. Bell, T. B., Landsman, W. R., & Shackelford, D. A. (2005). Auditing, auditing research, and the future of the accounting profession. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 24(s-1), 1– 5. Blay, A. D., & Geiger, M. A. (2013). Auditor fees and auditor independence: Evidence from going concern reporting decisions. Contemporary Accounting Research, 30(2), 579–606. Bruynseels, L., & Knechel, W. R. (2008). The effect of partner succession on client reporting decisions. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 27(2), 1–17. Carcello, J. V., & Neal, T. L. (2000). Audit committee composition and auditor reporting. The Accounting Review, 75(4), 453–467. Carey, P., & Simnett, R. (2006). Audit partner tenure and audit quality. The Accounting Review, 81(3), 653–676. Carson, E., Fargher, N., Geiger, M. A., Lennox, C. S., & Raghunandan, K. (2013). Audit reporting for going-concern uncertainty: A research synthesis. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 32(sp1), 353–384. Cohen, J., Krishnamoorthy, G., & Wright, A. M. (2004). The corporate governance mosaic and financial reporting quality. Journal of Accounting Literature, 23, 87–152. Dechow, P. M., Ge, W., Larson, C. R., & Sloan, R. G. (2011). Predicting material accounting misstatements. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28(1), 17–82. DeFond, M. L., & Zhang, J. (2014). A review of archival auditing research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 58(2–3), 275–326. Dhaliwal, D., Li, O. Z., & Yang, Y. (2022). Corporate sustainability and going concern opinions. The Accounting Review, 97(4), 431–457. Frost, C. A. (1994). The economic consequences of going concern audit reports. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 21(1), 123–139. Geiger, M. A., Raghunandan, K., & Riccardi, W. (2014). The global financial crisis: U.S. bankruptcies and going-concern audit opinions. Accounting Horizons, 28(1), 59–75. Gul, F. A., Wu, D., & Yang, Z. (2023). Board governance and audit quality: Evidence from going concern opinions. Contemporary Accounting Research, 40(2), 1120–1153. Hayne, C. (2023). Integrating agency theory and behavioral auditing: New directions for audit research. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 42(3), 1–25. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. Johnson-Rokosu, S. F. (2025). Impact of Going Concern Uncertainty on Financial Statement Quality: Management vs. Auditors’ Perspectives. Asian Journal of Economics, Finance and Management, 7(1), 754–771. Knechel, W. R., & Vanstraelen, A. (2007). The relationship between auditor tenure and audit quality implied by going concern opinions. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 26(1), 113–131. Knechel, W. R., Thomas, E., & Driskill, M. (2023). Understanding professional skepticism in a complex auditing environment. Accounting Horizons, 37(2), 1–23. Krishnan, G. V., Myllymäki, E. R., & Nagar, N. (2021). Does the COVID-19 pandemic affect going concern assessments? Accounting Horizons, 35(3), 1–21. Lennox, C. S., & Li, C. (2022). Going concern opinions and corporate governance in the post- pandemic era. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 41(3), Article 106932. Libby, R., & Luft, J. (1993). Determinants of judgment performance in accounting settings: Knowledge, motivation, and environment. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 18(5), 425–450. Mutchler, J. F. (1984). The influence of contingency factors on the going-concern opinion. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 3(2), 55–70. Mutchler, J. F., Hopwood, W., & McKeown, J. M. (1997). The influence of contrary information and mitigating factors on audit opinion decisions on bankrupt companies. Journal of Accounting Research, 35(2), 295–310. Nelson, M. W. (2009). A model and literature review of professional skepticism in auditing. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 28(2), 1–34. Perkins, M., Jansen, A., & Smith, T. (2024). Artificial intelligence in going concern assessments: Current applications and future directions. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 21(1), 89–104. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. (2017). AS 2415: Consideration of an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. https://pcaobus.org/oversight/standards/auditing- standards/details/AS2415 Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. (2023). Strategic plan: Protecting investors through innovation and enhanced oversight. https://pcaobus.org/about/strategic-plan Securities and Exchange Commission. (2022). Modernization of board diversity disclosures (Release Nos. 33-11198). https://www.sec.gov/files/rules/final/2022/33- 11198.pdf Trotman, K. T., Tan, H. C., & Ang, N. (2011). Fifty-year overview of judgment and decision- making research in accounting. Accounting & Finance, 51(1), 53–87. Zmijewski, M. E. (1984). Methodological issues related to the estimation of financial distress prediction models. Journal of Accounting Research, 22, 59–82.

More Articles from JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

Cashflow Management and the Performance of Commercial Banks in Nigeria

Author: Jeffrey Ayas Iyakonbogha, Clement E. Ozele

The Nigerian Code of Corporate Governance and Financial Performance of Deposit Money Banks in Nigeria

Author: i, Eneaniofu Daniel Mmaduakonam, ii, Azolike Nkiru Nkechi, iii, Emeter Patrick Okechukwu, iv, Okwor Emmanuel Ejimnkonye