Bridging the Great Divide: HRM Strategies for Synthesizing, rather than Just Managing, Multigenerational Workforce Differences

Keremah Helen Erepagamo

doi:10.56201/ijssmr.vol.12no1.2026.pg140.151

📄 Download Paper

Bridging the Great Divide: HRM Strategies for Synthesizing, rather than Just Managing, Multigenerational Workforce Differences

Keremah Helen Erepagamo

Abstract

The contemporary workplace is increasingly defined by the simultaneous presence of multiple generational cohorts, Baby Boomers, Generation X, Millennials, and Generation Z whose values, work orientations, and communication preferences have been shaped by distinct socio-historical, economic, and technological conditions. While prior human resource management scholarship has extensively documented generational differences, much of this literature remains largely descriptive, stereotype-prone, and insufficiently connected to strategic HR system design. Consequently, organizations continue to struggle with translating generational insights into sustainable performance outcomes. Addressing this gap, this paper advances a generational synthesis framework that reconceptualizes multigenerational diversity not as a challenge to be managed, but as a strategic resource to be intentionally integrated through adaptive HRM systems. Drawing on foundational debates in generational theory, organizational behavior, and strategic HRM, the paper synthesizes empirical evidence to identify both points of friction and convergence across generational cohorts. It then articulates evidence-based HRM interventions across key functional domains including talent acquisition, learning and development, performance management, leadership, communication, and total rewards that facilitate intergenerational knowledge exchange, psychological alignment, and collective capability building. By moving beyond compliance-driven diversity approaches and static generational typologies, the study positions generational synthesis as a mechanism for enhancing organizational learning, employee engagement, and long-term competitive advantage. The paper concludes by proposing a forward- looking research agenda that emphasizes longitudinal designs, cross-cultural validation, life- course perspectives, and technology-enabled personalization to deepen theoretical precision and empirical relevance in multigenerational

References

Bauer, T. N., Bodner, T., Erdogan, B., Truxillo, D. M., & Tucker, J. S. (2007). Newcomer adjustment during organizational socialization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(3), 707– 721. Boon, C., Den Hartog, D. N., & Lepak, D. P. (2019). A systematic review of human resource management systems and their measurement. Journal of Management, 45(6), 2498–2537. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318818718 Costanza, D. P., Badger, J. M., Fraser, R. L., Severt, J. B., & Gade, P. A. (2012). Generational differences in work-related attitudes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Business and Psychology, 27(4), 375–394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-012-9269-3 Jones, C., & Lyons, S. (2015). Workplace preferences and values across generations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(5), 743–765. Lyons, S. T., & Kuron, L. K. J. (2014). Generational differences in the workplace: A review of the evidence. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(S1), S139–S157. Lyons, S. T., & Schweitzer, L. (2017). A qualitative exploration of generational identity. Human Resource Management Review, 27(1), 1–14. Ng, E. S., & Parry, E. (2016). Multigenerational research in human resource management. Human Resource Management Review, 26(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2015.09.001 Ng, E. S., & Parry, E. (2016). Multigenerational research in human resource management. In G. K. Stahl, I. Björkman, & S. Morris (Eds.), Handbook of Research in International Human Resource Management (pp. 89–106). Edward Elgar Publishing. Noe, R. A., Clarke, A. D. M., & Klein, H. J. (2021). Learning in the twenty-first-century workplace. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 8, 245–275. Parry, E., & Urwin, P. (2011). Generational differences in work values. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13(1), 79–96. Rudolph, C. W., Rauvola, R. S., & Zacher, H. (2020). Leadership and generations at work: A critical review. The Leadership Quarterly, 31(1), 101385. Schroth, H. (2019). Are you ready for Gen Z in the workplace? California Management Review, 61(3), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125619841006 Smith, A. (2021). Understanding generational differences at work. Human Resource Management Review, 31(3), 100762. Strauss, W., & Howe, N. (1991). Generations: The history of America’s future, 1584 to 2069. William Morrow & Company. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Nelson-Hall. Twenge, J. M. (2017). iGen: Why today’s super-connected kids are growing up less rebellious, more tolerant, less happy and completely unprepared for adulthood. Atria Books. Twenge, J. M., Campbell, S. M., Hoffman, B. J., & Lance, C. E. (2010). Generational differences in work values. Journal of Management, 36(5), 1117–1142. Williams, K., & Page, R. (2019). The new workforce: Generation Z enters the workplace. Organizational Dynamics, 48(3), 100681.

Bridging the Great Divide: HRM Strategies for Synthesizing, rather than Just Managing, Multigenerational Workforce Differences

Abstract

References

More Articles from INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES AND MANAGEMENT RESEARCH