AI, Ethics, and Access: Designing Inclusive Digital Systems for the Next Billion Users

1. Floridi L, Cowls J. A unified framework of five principles for AI in society. Harv Data Sci Rev. 2019;1(1):1–15. 2. UNESCO. Artificial intelligence and inclusion: Global perspectives. Paris: UNESCO; 2021. 3. GSMA. The mobile economy 2023. London: GSMA; 2023. 4. World Bank. World development report 2021: Data for better lives. Washington DC: World Bank; 2021. 5. Eubanks V. Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. New York: St Martin’s Press; 2018. 6. Mittelstadt B, Allo P, Taddeo M, Wachter S, Floridi L. The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate. Big Data Soc. 2016;3(2):1–21. 7. Jobin A, Ienca M, Vayena E. The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nat Mach Intell. 2019;1:389–99. 8. Couldry N, Mejias UA. The costs of connection: How data is colonizing human life. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 2019. 9. van Dijk J. The digital divide. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2020. 10. Graham M, Dutton WH. Society and the internet. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2019. 11. Floridi L. Ethics of information. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2013. 12. Greene D, Hoffmann AL, Stark L. Better, nicer, clearer, fairer: A critical assessment of the movement for ethical AI. Proc ACM Hum Comput Interact. 2019;3:1–23. 13. Birhane A. Algorithmic injustice: A relational ethics approach. Patterns. 2021;2(2):100205. 14. Mill JS. Utilitarianism. London: Parker, Son, and Bourn; 1863. 15. Kant I. Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1997. 16. Sen A. Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1999. 17. Rawls J. Justice as fairness: A restatement. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press; 2001. 18. Warschauer M. Technology and social inclusion. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press; 2004. 19. Gelb A, Clark J. Identification for development: The biometrics revolution. CGD Policy Paper. 2013. 20. Helsper EJ. Digital inclusion: An international comparative study. New Media Soc. 2021;23(3):600–20. 21. Crawford K. Atlas of AI. New Haven: Yale University Press; 2021. 22. Benjamin R. Race after technology. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2019. 23. Zuboff S. The age of surveillance capitalism. London: Profile Books; 2019. 24. Norman D. The design of everyday things. New York: Basic Books; 2013. 25. Bødker S, Kensing F, Simonsen J. Participatory IT design. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press; 2004. 26. Costanza-Chock S. Design justice. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press; 2020. 27. D’Ignazio C, Klein L. Data feminism. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press; 2020. 28. ITU. Measuring digital development: Facts and figures 2023. Geneva: ITU; 2023. 29. Hilbert M. Digital inequality: A multidimensional analysis. Dev Policy Rev. 2016;34(1):1–28. 30. Donner J. Mobile communication in the developing world. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015. 31. Srnicek N. Platform capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2017. 32. van Deursen A, van Dijk J. Digital skills. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2014. 33. Reisdorf BC, Rhinesmith C. Digital inclusion as a core component of social inclusion. Policy Internet. 2020;12(3):1–19. P-ISSN 2695-186X 34. Joshi P et al. The state and fate of linguistic diversity in NLP. ACL. 2020. 35. Tatman R. Gender and dialect bias in speech recognition. Proc ACL. 2017. 36. OECD. AI policy observatory. Paris: OECD; 2022. 37. Yeung K. Algorithmic regulation. Regul Gov. 2018;12(4):505–23. 38. UNDP. Human development report 2023. New York: UNDP; 2023. 39. Acemoglu D, Johnson S. Power and progress. New York: PublicAffairs; 2023. 40. Couldry N, Mejias UA. Data colonialism. Big Data Soc. 2019;6(1). 41. Crenshaw K. Mapping the margins. Stanford Law Rev. 1991;43:1241–99. 42. Heeks R. Information and communication technology for development. Routledge; 2018. 43. Barocas S, Selbst A. Big data’s disparate impact. Calif Law Rev. 2016;104(3):671–732. 44. Buolamwini J, Gebru T. Gender shades. Proc FAT*. 2018;1–15. 45. Milan S, Treré E. Big data from the South. Telecommun Policy. 2019;43(1):1–12. 46. Heeks R, Shekhar S. Datafication and development. Dev Stud Res. 2019;6(1):1–18. 47. Amoore L. Cloud ethics. Theory Cult Soc. 2020;37(2):29–52. 48. Hurley M, Adebayo J. Credit scoring in the era of big data. Yale J Law Technol. 2017;18:148– 216. 49. Obermeyer Z et al. Dissecting racial bias in health algorithms. Science. 2019;366(6464):447– 53. 50. Raghavan M et al. Mitigating bias in algorithmic hiring. FAT*. 2020. 51. Rodney W. How Europe underdeveloped Africa. London: Bogle-L’Ouverture; 1972. 52. Kwet M. Digital colonialism. Race Class. 2019;60(4):3–26. 53. Burrell J. How the machine ‘thinks’. Big Data Soc. 2016;3(1). 54. Ananny M, Crawford K. Seeing without knowing. New Media Soc. 2018;20(3):973–89. 55. Edwards L, Veale M. Slave to the algorithm? Duke Law Technol Rev. 2017;16:18–55. 56. Gebru T et al. Datasheets for datasets. Commun ACM. 2021;64(12):86–92. 57. Milan S, van der Velden L. The alternative epistemologies of data activism. Big Data Soc. 2016. 58. Noble SU. Algorithms of oppression. New York: NYU Press; 2018. 59. Taylor L. What is data justice? Big Data Soc. 2017;4(2). 60. Floridi L et al. AI4People. Minds Mach. 2018;28:689–707. 61. Selbst AD et al. Fairness and abstraction in sociotechnical systems. FAT*. 2019. 62. W3C. Web content accessibility guidelines 2.1. 2018. 63. Sengers P et al. Reflective design. Proc DIS. 2005. 64. Rawls J. A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1971. 65. Doshi-Velez F, Kim B. Towards a rigorous science of interpretable ML. arXiv. 2017. 66. Bannon L. Reimagining HCI. Interactions. 2011;18(4):50–7. 67. Simonsen J, Robertson T. Routledge handbook of participatory design. London: Routledge; 2013. 68. DiSalvo C. Adversarial design. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press; 2012. 69. Mitchell M et al. Model cards for model reporting. FAT*. 2019. 70. Gebru T. Data documentation practices. Commun ACM. 2021. 71. Reisman D et al. Algorithmic impact assessments. AI Now Institute; 2018. 72. Pearce W et al. AI for social good. AI Soc. 2019;34:1–12. 73. Dearden A, Rizvi H. Participatory design in development. Proc PDC. 2008. 74. OpenAI. Open models and inclusive innovation. 2023. 75. Whittaker M et al. AI accountability. AI Now Report; 2018. P-ISSN 2695-186X 76. Raji ID et al. Closing the AI accountability gap. FAT*. 2020. 77. European Commission. Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI. Brussels; 2019. 78. OECD. AI and public governance. Paris; 2021. 79. Weller A. Transparency in AI. Philos Trans A. 2019;376. 80. Rahwan I. Society-in-the-loop. Nat Mach Intell. 2019;1:458–60. 81. Floridi L. The ethics of AI for social good. Philos Trans A. 2020. 82. UNDESA. Digital government and inclusion. New York; 2022. 83. World Economic Forum. Global AI governance. Geneva; 2023. 84. UNESCO. Recommendation on the ethics of AI. Paris; 2021. 85. OECD. Principles on artificial intelligence. Paris; 2019. 86. Wagner B. Ethics washing made in Europe. Big Data Soc. 2018. 87. Metcalf J et al. Owning ethics. Soc Stud Sci. 2019;49(3):449–76. 88. Veale M, Brass I. Administration by algorithm? Law Soc Rev. 2019;53(3):710–37. 89. Janssen M, Kuk G. The challenges of AI in government. Gov Inf Q. 2016;33(3):371–82. 90. Fung A. Varieties of participation. Public Adm Rev. 2006;66:66–75. 91. Smith G. Democratic innovations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009. 92. Kitchin R. The ethics of smart cities. Philos Trans A. 2016;374. 93. OECD. AI impact assessments. Paris; 2022. 94. UNDP. Digital strategy 2022–2025. New York; 2022. 95. Stahl BC. Ethical engineering for international development. Sci Eng Ethics. 2021;27:1–25. 96. Mittelstadt B. Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AI. Nat Mach Intell. 2019;1:501–7. 97. Pasquale F. The black box society. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press; 2015. 98. Janssen M, Estevez E. Lean government and AI. Gov Inf Q. 2013;30:S1–S11. 99. World Bank. Digital development overview. Washington DC; 2023. 100. Birhane A, Prabhu VU. Large image datasets. Proc FAccT. 2021.