Flexibility or Erosion? A Comparative Qualitative Analysis of the Adjustment of National Fiscal Rules in Response to A Global Economic Shock
Abstract
This study aims to conduct a comparative analysis of the adjustment of fiscal rules in response to the COVID-19 shock, thereby answering the question of whether this was an expression of healthy institutional flexibility or the beginning of an erosion of fiscal discipline. Using a qualitative, comparative method on two cases with distinct institutional settings - the European Union (EU) and several Latin American countries (Chile, Brazil, Colombia) the paper employs process-tracing and policy discourse analysis. The results show that the answer is critically dependent on the quality of fiscal institutions. In the EU, strong supranational institutions and a pre-defined escape clause allowed for controlled flexibility without eroding credibility. Conversely, in the Latin American countries, the absence of similar mechanisms and weaker supervisory institutions meant that ad-hoc adjustments posed a risk of undermining long-term fiscal discipline.
Keywords
References
More Articles from IIARD INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BANKING AND FINANCE RESEARCH
Author: Stephanie Nguhemen Gbande, Mike T. Soomiyol, Timothy Tyona, Gaius Msendoo Asombo
Author: Nguyen Mai Phuong
Author: 1Nwangwu, Okwudiri Iheanyi, 2 Pepple, Grace Jamie PhD
Author: Peter Ngbede Ajam, Abiodun Edward Adelegan, Benson Emmanuel
Author: i, Azolike Nkiru Nkechi, ii, Okwor Emmanuel Ejimnkonye, iii, Eneaniofu Daniel Mmaduakonam
