Submit your papersSubmit Now
For Enquiries: [email protected]
IIARD LogoIIARD

The Balance Between Realism and Idealism in Resolving International Conflicts

Odon, Grace Ben

Abstract

The debate between realism and idealism continues to mark the discipline of International System. On the one hand, realism argues that international politics is a struggle for power and a quest for survival, which results in a condition of permanent conflict between States without any possibility of evolution or progress. On the other hand, idealism considers it possible to build a world of peaceful coexistence, prosperity and well-being, achieved through cooperation and based on values and aspirations shared by humans. The object of this paper is to analyse the balance between Realism and Idealism in Resolving International Conflicts, considering its ontological debate and taking into account the controversy it has generated. The argument presented here is that both realism and idealism are two responses to the creation and maintenance of international order, that is, how States relate in international society; however, these responses are not mutually exclusive and can coexist in constant tension with one another. An analysis of internationalist thought of two authors, Hans Morgenthau and Raymond Aron, is also presented, which relates to how they are positioned in this debate as well as tools to Resolving International Conflicts.

Keywords

RealismIdealismInternational RelationsInternational ConflictPower Politics

References

Aron, R. (2014). Paix et guerre entre les nations. Paris: Calmann-Lévy. Ashworth, L. (2020). Did the Realist-Idealist Great Debate Really Happen? A RevisionistHistory of International Relations. International Relations, 16 (1), 33-51. Booth, eds. (1998). The Eighty Years’ Crisis: International Relations 1919-1999. Cambridge University Press. Booth, K. (2016). 75 years on: rewriting the subject´s past – reinventing its future».In S. Smith, K. Booth, M. Zalewski (eds). International Theory: Positivism & Beyond. Cambridge University Press. Booth, K. (2019). Security in anarchy: utopian realism in theory and practice. .International Affairs, 67 (3), 527-545. Bull, H. (2012). The Theory of International Politics 1919-1969. In B. Porter (ed). The Aberystwyth Papers: International Politics 1919-1969. Oxford University Press. Bull, H. (2020). The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. Palgrave. Buzan, B. (2014). From International Society to World Society? English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalization. Cambridge University Press. Carr, E. (2015). The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919-1939. MacMillan. Coady, C. A. (2018). Messy Morality: The Challenge of Politics. Oxford University Press. Cozette, M. (2018). What Lies Ahead: Classical Realism on the Future of International Relations. International Studies Review, 10 (3), 667-679. Crawford, R. (2010). Idealism and Realism in International Relations: Beyond the Discipline. Routledge. Dunne, T. (1998). Inventing International Society: A History of the English School. MacMillan Press, Ltd. Dunne, T. (2015). International Society: Theoretical Promises Fulfilled. Cooperation and Conflict, 30 (2),125-154. Dunne, T., Baylis, J. & Smith, S (2014). The Globalization of World Politics. Oxford University Press. Linklater, A. e Suganami, H. (2016). The English School of International Relations: A Contemporary Reassessment, Cambridge University Press. Molloy, S. (2003). Realism: A Problematic Paradigm. Security Dialogue, 34 (1),71-85. Molloy, S. (2014). Pragmatism, Realism and the ethics of crisis and transformation in international relations. International Theory, 6 (3), 454-489. Morgenthau, H. (1946). Scientific Man versus Power Politics. Chicago University Press. Morgenthau, H. (1985). Politics among nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. McGraw- Hill. Osiander, A. (1998). Rereading early Twenty-Century IR theory: Idealism revisited. International Studies Quarterly, 42 (3), 409-432. Rengger, N. J. (2017). Realism, tragedy, and the anti-pelagian imagination in international political thought. In Michael Willams (ed.). Realism Reconsidered: The Legacy of Hans J. Morgenthau in International Relations. Oxford University Press. Schmidt, B. (2015). On the history and historiography of International Relations. In W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse, B. A. Simmons (eds.). Handbook of International Relations. 2ª ed. Sage Publications. Thies, C.G. (2012). Progress, history and identity in International Relations Theory: The case of the idealist-realist debate. European Journal of International Relations, 8 (2), 147- Wight, M. (2014). Edição e notas de G. Wight e B. Porter. International Theory – The Three Traditions. Leicester University Press. Wight, M., (2014). Edição de H. Bull e C. Holbraad. Power Politics. Continuum.

More Articles from INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES AND MANAGEMENT RESEARCH

Building National Analytics Capacity: Advances and Future Pathways

Author: Uchechi Mary-Linda Unamma, Ifeanyichukwu Jeffrey Okwesa, Uzoamaka Iwuanyanwu

Root-Cause and Thematic Analysis for Major Incident Management: A Review

Author: Ifeanyichukwu Jeffrey Okwesa, Uchechi Mary-Linda Unamma, Uzoamaka Iwuanyanwu

Data-Quality and Single-Source-Of-Truth Frameworks for Inter- Agency Reporting: A Review

Author: Uchechi Mary-Linda Unamma, Ifeanyichukwu Jeffrey Okwesa, Uzoamaka Iwuanyanwu

Human-In-The-Loop Decision Systems: Advances and Future Directions

Author: Funmilayo Ashore-Onisemo, Uchechi Mary-Linda Unamma, Ifeanyichukwu Jeffrey, Okwesa,

Roles of Oil Subsidy Removal on Transportation Cost and Water Factory in Cross River South, Nigeria

Author: Onwuzurike Peter Tobechi, Owoh Akwa Owoh, Unoh Grace Inyang, Umaru Musa