Submit your papersSubmit Now
For Enquiries: [email protected]
IIARD LogoIIARD

Measurement and Scaling in Research Methodology: Foundations, Advancements, and Contemporary Challenges

Ubogu Festus Elugom, PhD, Ejiofor Emmanuel O PhD

Abstract

This paper provides a comprehensive examination of measurement and scaling within the context of research methodology. Measurement and scaling are fundamental to empirical research, allowing researchers to quantify abstract concepts, establish relationships between variables, and draw meaningful conclusions. This paper traces the historical development of measurement theory, explores the four primary levels of measurement (nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio), and critically evaluates a range of scaling techniques including Likert scales, semantic differential scales, and Thurstone scales. Further, it examines contemporary challenges such as cross-cultural measurement equivalence, the integration of qualitative and quantitative approaches to measurement, and the implications of emerging technologies (e.g., big data analytics, AI) on measurement practices. The paper synthesizes existing literature, identifies key areas for future research, and underscores the importance of rigorous measurement practices for enhancing the validity and reliability of research findings.

Keywords

measurements scalingresearchmethodologycontemporary.

References

Allen, I. E., & Seaman, C. A. (2007). Likert scales: What are the options?. Journal of the Australasian Evaluation Society, 7(2), 7-15. Anastasi, A. (1988). Psychological testing (6th ed.). Macmillan. Babbie, E. R. (2016). The practice of social research (14th ed.). Cengage Learning. Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & van Heerden, J. (2003). The concept of validity. Psychological Review, 111(4), 1061-1071. Bringmann, L. F., Vissers, N., Wichers, M., Geschwind, N., Kuppens, P., Peeters, F., ... & Tuku, B. (2013). A network approach to psychopathology: New insights into clinical longitudinal data. PloS one, 8(4), e60188. Carmines, E. G., & Zeller, R. A. (1979). Reliability and validity assessment. Sage Publications. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334. Cronbach, L. J., Gleser, G. C., Nanda, H., & Rajaratnam, N. (1972). The dependability of behavioral measurements: Theory of generalizability for scores and profiles. Wiley. Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281-302. Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Guttman, L. (1944). A basis for scaling qualitative data. American Sociological Review, 9(2), 139-150. Haynes, S. N., Richard, D. C. S., & Kubany, E. S. (1995). Content validity in psychological assessment: Definition and methods. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 238-247. Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140, 5-55. Lord, F. M. (1952). A theory of test scores. Psychometric Monographs, No. 7. Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons' responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50(9), 741-749. Michell, J. (1999). Measurement in psychology: A critical history of a methodological concept. Cambridge University Press. O'Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. Crown. Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957). The measurement of meaning. University of Illinois Press. Paulhus, D. L. (1991). Measurement and control of response bias. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 17-59). Academic Press. Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen: Danmarks Paedagogiske Institut. Shavelson, R. J., & Webb, N. M. (1991). Generalizability theory: A primer. Sage Publications. Shmueli, G., & Koppius, O. R. (2011). Predictive vs. explanatory modeling in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 35(3), 553-572. Siegel, S. (1956). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. McGraw-Hill. Spearman, C. (1904). "General Intelligence," objectively determined and measured. American Journal of Psychology, 15(2), 201-293. Spearman, C. (1910). Correlation calculated from faulty data. British Journal of Psychology, 3(3), 271-295. Steenkamp, J. B. E. M., & Baumgartner, H. (1998). Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(1), 78-90. Stemler, S. E. (2004). A comparison of consensus, consistency, and measurement approaches to estimating interrater reliability. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 9(4), 1-14. Stevens, S. S. (1946). On the theory of scales of measurement. Science, 103(2684), 677-680. Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Sage Publications. Thurstone, L. L. (1928). Attitudes can be measured. American Journal of Sociology, 33(4), 529-554. Torgerson, W. S. (1958). Theory and methods of scaling. Wiley. Tourangeau, R., Rips, L. J., & Rasinski, K. (2000). The psychology of survey response. Cambridge University Press. Traub, R. E. (1994). Reliability for the social sciences: Theory and applications. Sage Publications. van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leung, K. (1997). Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research. Sage Publications.

More Articles from INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES AND MANAGEMENT RESEARCH

Building National Analytics Capacity: Advances and Future Pathways

Author: Uchechi Mary-Linda Unamma, Ifeanyichukwu Jeffrey Okwesa, Uzoamaka Iwuanyanwu

Root-Cause and Thematic Analysis for Major Incident Management: A Review

Author: Ifeanyichukwu Jeffrey Okwesa, Uchechi Mary-Linda Unamma, Uzoamaka Iwuanyanwu

Data-Quality and Single-Source-Of-Truth Frameworks for Inter- Agency Reporting: A Review

Author: Uchechi Mary-Linda Unamma, Ifeanyichukwu Jeffrey Okwesa, Uzoamaka Iwuanyanwu

Human-In-The-Loop Decision Systems: Advances and Future Directions

Author: Funmilayo Ashore-Onisemo, Uchechi Mary-Linda Unamma, Ifeanyichukwu Jeffrey, Okwesa,

Roles of Oil Subsidy Removal on Transportation Cost and Water Factory in Cross River South, Nigeria

Author: Onwuzurike Peter Tobechi, Owoh Akwa Owoh, Unoh Grace Inyang, Umaru Musa