Submit your papersSubmit Now
For Enquiries: [email protected]
IIARD LogoIIARD

Unveiling Gender Bias in Budgeting: A Qualitative Inquiry into Policy and Practice

Prof. Aliyu IDRIS

Abstract

Gender budgeting is a crucial mechanism for promoting financial equity and ensuring that resource allocation addresses the diverse socio-economic needs of men and women. However, despite the increasing recognition of gender-responsive budgeting (GRB) as a policy tool, implicit budget formulation and implementation biases persist across both public and private sectors. This study employs a qualitative research approach to explore gender bias in budgeting, focusing on policy frameworks, institutional structures, and the lived experiences of financial decision-makers. Through in-depth interviews and thematic analysis, the study uncovers systemic barriers such as deeply ingrained institutional biases, limited political commitment, inadequate gender-disaggregated data, and weak enforcement mechanisms. Findings indicate that while some governments and organisations have adopted GRB policies, their effectiveness is often undermined by structural inefficiencies and resistance to gender mainstreaming. The study concludes by offering practical recommendations to strengthen gender-sensitive financial planning, including policy reforms, improved data collection, and capacity-building initiatives to foster inclusive budgetary processes. This research contributes to the growing discourse on gender equity in financial governance, providing insights for policymakers, scholars, and gender advocates.

References

Buchanan, J. M., & Tullock, G. (1962). The calculus of consent: Logical foundations of constitutional democracy. University of Michigan Press. Budlender, D., & Hewitt, G. (2003). Engendering budgets: A practitioners' guide to understanding and implementing gender-responsive budgets. Commonwealth Secretariat. Chakraborty, L. (2016). Asia: A survey of gender budgeting efforts. International Monetary Fund. Elson, D. (1999). Gender and macroeconomic policy. World Development, 27(3), 611–627. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(98)00155-2 Elson, D. (2002). Gender-responsive budgeting in practice: A review of existing tools and approaches. World Development, 30(3), 545–564. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305- 750X(01)00110-0 Kabeer, N. (2005). Gender equality and women's empowerment: A critical analysis of the third millennium development goal. Gender and Development, 13(1), 13–24. Ogbuagu, M. I., & Ewubare, D. B. (2019). Gender-responsive budgeting and women’s economic empowerment in Nigeria. International Journal of Gender and Development Studies, 2(1), 45-60. Scott, W. R. (2004). Institutional theory: Contributing to a theoretical research program. In K. G. Smith & M. A. Hitt (Eds.), Great minds in management: The process of theory development (pp. 460–484). Oxford University Press. Sharp, R., & Broomhill, R. (2013). A case for gender-responsive budgeting? Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 25(2), 200-223. Stotsky, J. G. (2016). Gender budgeting: Fiscal context and current outcomes. International Monetary Fund.

More Articles from INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES AND MANAGEMENT RESEARCH

Building National Analytics Capacity: Advances and Future Pathways

Author: Uchechi Mary-Linda Unamma, Ifeanyichukwu Jeffrey Okwesa, Uzoamaka Iwuanyanwu

Root-Cause and Thematic Analysis for Major Incident Management: A Review

Author: Ifeanyichukwu Jeffrey Okwesa, Uchechi Mary-Linda Unamma, Uzoamaka Iwuanyanwu

Data-Quality and Single-Source-Of-Truth Frameworks for Inter- Agency Reporting: A Review

Author: Uchechi Mary-Linda Unamma, Ifeanyichukwu Jeffrey Okwesa, Uzoamaka Iwuanyanwu

Human-In-The-Loop Decision Systems: Advances and Future Directions

Author: Funmilayo Ashore-Onisemo, Uchechi Mary-Linda Unamma, Ifeanyichukwu Jeffrey, Okwesa,

Roles of Oil Subsidy Removal on Transportation Cost and Water Factory in Cross River South, Nigeria

Author: Onwuzurike Peter Tobechi, Owoh Akwa Owoh, Unoh Grace Inyang, Umaru Musa