Optimizing the Comparative Advantage of Agricultural Products in the Three Senatorial Zones of Kaduna State to Enhance Food Security in Response to Global Climate Changes

Dr. Olufunwa; Ade Samuel; Vayin; Nuhu Jori; Dr.  Ango Nache Inuwa

doi:10.56201/ijssmr.v10.no9.2024.pg194.206

📄 Download Paper

Optimizing the Comparative Advantage of Agricultural Products in the Three Senatorial Zones of Kaduna State to Enhance Food Security in Response to Global Climate Changes

Dr. Olufunwa, Ade Samuel, Vayin, Nuhu Jori, Dr. Ango Nache Inuwa

Abstract

This research focuses on optimizing the comparative advantage of agricultural products across Kaduna State's three senatorial zones to enhance food security in response to global climate change. A descriptive survey research design was employed to guide the study, with stratified sampling comprises of 18 (6 local government areas from each zone) randomly selected from the 23 local government areas in the state. A sample size of approximately 2,556 farmers was selected using the Yaro Yamane formula for determining the sample size. Through a combination of quantitative and qualitative methodologies, including Geographic Information System (GIS) mapping, econometric modeling, stakeholder interviews, and field observations, the study comprehensively analyzed the agricultural landscapes, products endowments, and climate patterns of the selected local government areas and access the current agricultural practices, productivity and challenges faced by farmers in each senatorial zone to achieve its goals. Four research questions and a hypothesis were used in the study. A 100-item, five-point likert scale questionnaire, validated with a reliability index of 0.865, was adjudged as reliable instrument and usable for the study. Mean and standard deviation were used to answer the research questions while multi-regression analysis was applied to test the null hypotheses at 0.05 significance level. The result showed significance difference in crop yield between comparative advantage crops and other cultural agricultural practices yield with a calculated value of 4.26 was greater than the regression valued of 1.74. Based on the findings the North Senatorial Zone should focus on Millet, Sorghum, Groundnuts, Cowpea, and Sesame; the Central Senatorial Zone on Maize, Soybeans, Rice, Tomatoes, and Cotton; while the South Senatorial Zone on ginger, Yam, Cassava, Plantain/Bananas. The study also recommended strategies for improving agricultural p

Keywords

OptimizationComparative AdvantageAgricultural ProductsSenatorial ZonesFood

References

Adger, W. N., Huq, S., Brown, K., Conway, D., & Hulme, M. (2002). Adaptation to climate change: Setting the agenda for development policy and research. Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research Working Paper, 16(16), 1-86. Adler, F. H., & Tompkins, R. E. (1997). The equitable distribution of the gains from trade and investment: exploring the issues In Globalization and the Poor (pp. 91-107). Palgrave Macmillan, London Aloysius,E.U. (2011), Practical guide to writing research project reports in tertiary institution Chesion ltd. Uwani.Enugu, (pp 54 – 122) Malaysia University Student, international Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(4), Andrew Walker (2012), Northern Nigeria in the age of globalization: money, mobilization, and the birth of a new nation: the case of Kaduna, Nigeria: unpublished M.Sc project Anyanwuocha R. A. I (2008). Fundamental of Economics for Senior Secondary Schools. African First Publishers Limited, Onitsha, Nigeria. Costinot, A., & Donaldson, D. (2012). Ricardo's theory of comparative advantage: old idea, new evidence. American Economic Review, 102(3), 453-58. Coxhead, I. (2007). A new resource curse? Impacts of China's boom on comparative advantage and resource dependence in Southeast Asia. World Development, 35(7), 1099-1119. Ewa Udo & Agu G.A (2004), New System Economics: A Senior Secondary Course. African First Publishers Limited, Onitsha, Nigeria, (213-219). Grossman, G. M., & Rossi-Hansberg, E. (2008). Trading Tasks: A Simple Theory of Offshoring. American Economic Review, 98(5), 1978-1997. Jhingan M. L (2012), Principles of Economics. Vrinda Publication (P) Limited. B-5, Ashish Complex: Mayur Virhar, Phase-1, Delhi Kaduna State Agricultural Development Project (KADP 2020), Reports on agricultural activities, crop yields, and extension services in Kaduna State. (https://www.kdsg.gov.ng/) Lundquist, K. J., & Olander, L. O. (2019). Proximity, accessibility and regional development: the case of the Swedish taxi industry. Regional Studies, 53(12), 1689-1700. Schneider, M., Holzer, A., & Hoffman, V. H. (2008). Understanding the carbon disclosure project: An analysis of climate impacts and stakeholder relations. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(2), 365-379.

Optimizing the Comparative Advantage of Agricultural Products in the Three Senatorial Zones of Kaduna State to Enhance Food Security in Response to Global Climate Changes

Abstract

Keywords

References

More Articles from INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES AND MANAGEMENT RESEARCH