Submit your papersSubmit Now
For Enquiries: [email protected]
IIARD LogoIIARD

Strategic Orientation, Corporate Social Responsibilities and Firm Performance in Nigerian Airports

Awwal Ibrahim Yusuf, Shehu Inuwa Galoji

Abstract

One of most important pillars that have major implications for an organizations structure, activities investments relations with market and performance is strategy. Adopting the best strategy out there requires organization to coordinate their approaches in establishing industry positions and or by relying on its resources, competences, and capabilities in an effort to achieve a fit with their internal and external environments and in turn achieve a sustained competitive advantage and improved business efficiency. Therefore, strategic orientation of the firm reflects its operational, marketing and entrepreneurial posture. The objectives of this study are to examine the relationship between Strategic Orientation, Corporate Social Responsibilities and Firm Performance in Nigerian Airports. Quantitative approach was used through the use of survey questionnaire. The population for this study is the staff working at both listed airport in the northern Nigeria. The respondents were the airport managers, staff, passengers, head of parastatals and community members. The result of the study found that there is no effect of Philanthropic responsibility, Legal responsibilities, Ethical responsibilities and Economic responsibilities on the Strategic Orientation of listed state airport in northern Nigeria.

References

Ackoff R. L. (2017), Redesigning the future, New York: Wiley. Artiach, T., Lee, D., Nelson, D. and Walker, J., (2018), “The Determinants of Corporate Sustainability Performance,” Accounting and Finance, Vol. 50, No. 1, pp. 31-51. Baron, D. P., (2019), “Business and its Environment, “New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Blattberg, Charles (2020), "Welfare: Towards the Patriotic Corporation,"From Pluralist to Patriotic Politics: Putting Practice First, New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 172– 184. ISBN 0-19-829688-6. Bowen, H., (2020), “Social Responsibilities of the Businessman,” New York: Harper and Bros. N. Osmanagi? Bedenik et al. Corporate Social Responsibility and Company Performance, the Holistic Approach to Environment 3, 153-173 Brammer, S. and Pavelin, S., (2018), “Corporate Community Contributions in the United Kingdom and the United States, “Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 56, No. 1, pp. 15-26. Branco, M. C., and Rodrigues, L. L., (2018), “Factors Influencing Social Responsibility Disclosure by Portuguese Companies, “Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 83, No. 4, pp. 685–701. Brown, N., andDeegan, C., (2017), “The Public Disclosure of Environmental Performance Information: A Dual Test of Media Agenda Setting Theory and Legitimacy Theory, “Accounting and Business Research, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 21-41. Campbell, J. L. (2018), Institutional change and globalization, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Carroll, A. B., (2018), “A Three-dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Social Performance, “Academy of Management Review, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 497–505. Carroll, A. B., (2019), “The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders, “Business Horizons, Vol. 34, No. 4, pp. 39- 48. Carroll, A. B., and Shabana K. M., (2018), “The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review of Concepts, Research, and Practice,” International Journal of Management Reviews, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp.85-105. Cheers, (2020), Corporate Social Responsibility, The Corporate Social Responsibility Debate Crane, A., Matten, D. and Spence, L. J., (2018), “Corporate Social Responsibility: Readings and Cases in a Global Context,” London et al.: Routledge Chapman and Hall. Cropanzano, R., and Mitchell, M. S. (2015), Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874-900. Daft, R. (2019), Organization theory and design (7th Ed), Cincinnati, Ohio: South- Western. Deegan, C., and Rankin, M., (2017), “The Environmental Reporting Expectations Gap: Australian Evidence, “The British Accounting Review, Vol. 31, No. 3, pp. 313-346. Elkington, J., (2017), “Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business”, Oxford: New Society Publishers. Emerson, R M (2018), "Social Exchange Theory,"Annual Review of Sociology, 2: 335–362.

More Articles from IIARD INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS MANAGEMENT