Submit your papersSubmit Now
For Enquiries: [email protected]
IIARD LogoIIARD

The Omni Source Theory of God (OSTG): A Systematic Theology and Philosophical Framework for Understanding the Origin and Source of All Things.

Nwabuatu, Emmanuel Nnajiubah. Ph. D

Abstract

This paper introduced and systematically developed the Omni Source Theory of God , Omni Source theory of God is an original theological cum philosophical framework proposing that God is the only uncaused cause that caused all causable. The paper argued that God is the singular, self-subsisting, infinite ground of all existence. Unlike classical theistic models that frame God primarily as a moral agent who creates and sustains a morally ordered cosmos, Omni Source Theory of God advances the thesis that God is the ontological source of all reality, including what finite conscious mind categorizes as good, evil, pleasure, pain, order, and chaos. The theory is saturated and supported with avalanche of references from Bible (Genesis 1. 1-24) (John 1:1-3) The theory identified eight essential transcendental divine attributes, designated by the acronym S.P.I.I.I.C.E.S. The acronym stands for Sovereignty, Pervasiveness, Intelligence, Immortal, Immutable, Creator, Eternal, Self- Sufficiency. The acronym constitutes the eight constructs employed by the researcher to simplify and explain God as the Source, originator and continued sustainer of all of things through the agency of His spoken word. (Genesis 1:1-3) (John 1: 1:1-5) (Hebrews 1:3). The eight constructs constitute pillars upon which the present research framework rests. Omni Source Theory of God offered a distinctive theodicy (the Spectrum Theodicy), which repositions the problem of evil from a theological liability into an ontological necessity within sovereign divine sourcing. The paper further developed an anthropological corollary grounded in the concept of the image of conscience, arguing that human moral consciousness uniquely mediates between the divine source and the creaturely experience of good and evil. Critical tensions within the theory were identified and resolved. The determinism- responsibility problem, the risk of moral relativism, dualism and the pantheism boundary are identified and resolved through engagement with classical and contemporary theological literature. Omni Source Theory of God is situated within the broader landscape of absolute monotheistic theology. Pantheism and other philosophy of religion, and its implications for theodicy, soteriology, and religious ethics are critically reviewed with intention to weigh their logic against absolute monotheism as propagated in the bible. At the end of the tunnel, the weight of Omni Source theory of God far outweighs other counter opinions. In fact, Omni source theory of God is fundamental to the doctrine of absolute monotheism and closes the door against the doctrine of dualism, pantheism and semi monotheism. The doctrine of dualistic view of God assert the ontology of two supreme creators, one responsible for good (positive) and the other responsible P-ISSN 2695-219X for evil (negative) and are known as Angura Manyu and Angura Mazda respectively. Pantheism assert that everything is God and God is everything. Semi monotheism is of the view that there are three persons in one God (Trinity) view of God). However, if we truly believe in absolute monotheism as the bible strictly instructed, (Exodus 20:3) that God is absolutely one, from true and pure Biblical monotheistic point of view (Deuteronomy 6:4) The findings of the study revealed that God is the only uncaused cause. Uncreated creator (Isaiah 43:10) (Deuteronomy 33:27) (1 Timothy 1:17) That God created all things, visible and invisible. (Genesis 1”1-24) (John 1:1:1- 3). That God truly form light, and creates darkness, make peace and create evil: I the lord do all these things (Isaiah 45:7). That God is the ultimate cause and originator of everything. That nothing pops up on its own. That everything as created by God from the beginning is good.( Genesis 1:31)That God created everything for his pleasure and purpose best known to him alone (Revelation 4:11) ( Colossians 1:16 )Those are the true position of the Bible ( Genesis 1:1-24) (John 1:1-3) (Acts 17:28) (Colossians 1:16-17) The study therefore concluded that God is responsible source of existence of everything, visible and invisible, good and bad, pleasure and pain. That what mortals call or consider evil is not actually evil because it is part of God’s purposeful very good output, commissioned to serving specific purpose in the program of God. Though, the experience may be painful or pleasurable to mortals. That is part of his supreme will (1 Thessalonians 5: 16-18) (Proverbs 16:4) That God is the supreme ruler of the universe, that nothing happens by accident or outside his will (Daniel 4:35) That everything depends on Him for sustenance and preservation. Everything God created is good and is for a specific supreme purpose. God did not create or cause evil. God did not create evil because God doesn’t experience pain. Men experience pain or evil because of the way men’s sensibilities and material body are wired to be mortals.

Keywords

Omni Source Theory of Godtheodicymonotheismpantheismdivine sovereigntymoral consciousnessphilosophy of religion

References

Adams, M. M. (1999). Horrendous evils and the goodness of God. Cornell University Press. Al-Ghazali. (1998). The incoherence of the philosophers (M. E. Marmura, Trans.). Brigham Young University Press. (Original work composed c. 1095 CE) Alston, W. P. (1991). Perceiving God: The epistemology of religious experience. Cornell University Press. Aquinas, T. (1948). Summa Theologica (Fathers of the English Dominican Province, Trans.). Benziger Brothers. (Original work completed c. 1274) Aristotle. (1984). Metaphysics. In J. Barnes (Ed.), The complete works of Aristotle (Vol. 2, W. D. Ross, Trans.). Princeton University Press. (Original work written c. 350 BCE) Barrett, J. L. (2004). Why would anyone believe in God? AltaMira Press. Boethius. (1999). The consolation of philosophy (V. Watts, Trans.). Penguin Classics. (Original work written c. 524 CE) Boyer, P. (2001). Religion explained: The evolutionary origins of religious thought. Basic Books. Clayton, P., & Peacocke, A. (Eds.). (2004). In whom we live and move and have our being: Panentheistic reflections on God's presence in a scientific world. Eerdmans. Hartshorne, C. (1948). The divine relativity: A social conception of God. Yale University Press. Hick, J. (1989). An interpretation of religion: Human responses to the transcendent. Yale University Press. Hick, J. (2010). Evil and the God of love (Rev. ed.). Palgrave Macmillan. (Original work published 1966) Hume, D. (1779). Dialogues concerning natural religion. Publisher unknown (posthumous publication). Kant, I. (1998). Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals (M. Gregor, Trans. & Ed.). Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1785) Kohlberg, L. (1981). Essays on moral development: Vol. 1. The philosophy of moral development. Harper & Row. Leibniz, G. W. (1985). Theodicy: Essays on the goodness of God, the freedom of man and the origin of evil (E. M. Huggard, Trans.). Open Court. (Original work published 1710) Mackie, J. L. (1955). Evil and omnipotence. Mind, 64(254), 200-212. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/LXIV.254.200 Maimonides, M. (1963). The guide for the perplexed (S. Pines, Trans.). University of Chicago Press. (Original work composed c. 1190 CE) Nasr, S. H. (1981). Knowledge and the sacred. State University of New York Press. Newman, J. H. (1979). An essay in aid of a grammar of assent. University of Notre Dame Press. (Original work published 1870) Piaget, J. (1997). The moral judgment of the child (M. Gabain, Trans.). Free Press. (Original work published 1932) Plantinga, A. (1974). God, freedom and evil. Eerdmans. Plantinga, A. (1977). God and other minds: A study of the rational justification of belief in God. Cornell University Press. Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite. (1987). Pseudo-Dionysius: The complete works (C. Luibheid, Trans.). Paulist Press. (Original works composed c. 500 CE) Scholem, G. (1954). Major trends in Jewish mysticism (3rd rev. ed.). Schocken Books. Spinoza, B. (1994). The ethics and other works (E. Curley, Trans. & Ed.). Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1677) P-ISSN 2695-219X The Holy Bible, New International Version. (2011). Biblica. [Scriptural passages cited throughout from Genesis, Exodus, Isaiah, Amos, Job, Romans, John, Colossians, Ecclesiastes, Ephesians, Galatians, Revelation, Psalms, Acts, Proverbs, and 1 Timothy.] Tillich, P. (1951). Systematic theology: Vol. 1. Reason and revelation, being and God. University of Chicago Press. Tillich, P. (1957). Dynamics of faith. Harper & Row. Whitehead, A. N. (1929). Process and reality: An essay in cosmology. Macmillan. Whitehouse, H. (2004). Modes of religiosity: A cognitive theory of religious transmission. AltaMira Press. Wolfson, E. R. (2005). Language, eros, being: Kabbalistic hermeneutics and poetic imagination. Fordham University Press. Beginning

More Articles from INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS AND CULTURAL PRACTICE

Impact of Pious Study of Social Etiquette & Rules in Ijaw Culture

Author: Prof. Clifford Meesua Sibani Prof. Innime Righteous Onyinyechi Fidelia Moses, Onyendu Okai, PhD Eberechukwu Blessing Amaka Wotogbe-Ozuzuma, Igwechi, Hope Ununuma Ideaozu