Submit your papersSubmit Now
For Enquiries: [email protected]
IIARD LogoIIARD

Re-Evaluation of Bermuda Triangle Hypothesis on Physical, Hydrodynamic, and Geophysical Analysis of Vortex Dynamics in the Western North Atlantic

Sakwe Adianimovie, Waribugo Douglas Clinton, Idumangi Nabil Mandator, Bassey Uwem Edet, Edward, Augustine Akporesiri, Ere Ekiekumo, Augustine, Erhiakpore Timothy, and Gagede, Krotimi

Abstract

This paper presents a formal fluid dynamic and transport phenomena evaluation of the relationship between force mechanisms and vortex motion in the western North Atlantic. It is a domain conventionally designated as the Bermuda Triangle. The study rigorously evaluates whether empirical or theoretical physical evidence supports the existence of unique, localized forces or supernatural vortex phenomena capable of causing maritime and aviation disappearances. Applying foundational principles of continuum mechanics, geophysical fluid dynamics, and atmospheric dynamics, the paper had model canonical vortex structures including forced, free, and Rankine combined vortices and scale them against natural rotational flows such as mesoscale ocean eddies and tropical cyclones. Furthermore, the investigation addresses critical physical gaps frequently omitted from traditional literatures, defining mathematical formulations for surface wind stress vectors, two-phase methane hydrate ebullient density reductions, non-linear Schrödinger rogue wave interactions, microburst downburst mechanics, and agonic geomagnetic drift dynamics. Mapping these mathematical formulations directly to historical incidents confirms that open-ocean boundary conditions cannot sustain stationary, macro-scale forced vortices or downward hydrodynamic suction fields. Instead, vessel disappearances and the absence of wreckage are fully described by Rankine storm-core turbulence, non-linear wave slamming, buoyancy destabilization, and rapid debris advection along the Gulf Stream's high-velocity vector (Vmax > 2.5 m/s). In conclusion, while multi-physics environmental force vectors create hazardous operational conditions, no anomalous physical forces exist within the region and there is no scientifically verified evidence of localized or supernatural vortex forces. Observed losses align strictly with standard statistical risk distributions in heavily navigated, high-energy transport corridors.

Keywords

Vortex motionEnvironmental ForceTransport phenomenaFluid mechanicsGulf StreamBermuda TriangleSurface wavesGeophysical fluid dynamicsVorticity. IJEMT i.

References

Agee, E. M., Chen, T. S., & Dowell, K. E. (1973). A review of cells and bands in the atmosphere. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 54(1), 1008–1031 Aksenov, Y., Bacon, S., Coward, A. C., & Holliday, N. P. (2010). Polar outflow from the Arctic Ocean: A high-resolution model study. Journal of Marine Systems, 80(3–4), 143–167. Baines, P. G. (1998). Topographic effects in stratified fluids. Cambridge University Press. Batchelor, G. K. (2000). An introduction to fluid dynamics. Cambridge University Press. Berteaux, H. O. (1991). Buoy engineering: Fundamentals and applications. John Wiley & Sons. Bermuda Weather Service. (2026). Glossary of meteorological terms and Bermuda climate statistics. Bermuda Airport Authority. Bialas, J., Klaucke, I., & Netzeband, G. L. (2016). Methane hydrates and gas seepage in marine sediments. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 72(1), 350–368. H Boccaletti, G., Ferrari, R., Adcroft, A., Ferreira, D., & Marshall, J. (2007). The vertical structure of ocean vertical heat transport. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 37(9), 2228–2250. Charnock, H. (1955). Wind stress on a water surface. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 81(350), 639–640. Cushman-Roisin, B., & Beckers, J.-M. (2011). Introduction to geophysical fluid dynamics: Physical and numerical aspects (2nd ed.). Academic Press. Dijkstra, H. A. (2005). Nonlinear physical oceanography: A dynamical systems approach to the large scale ocean circulation and El Niño. Springer. Dysthe, K., Krogstad, H. E., & Müller, P. (2008). Oceanic rogue waves. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 40(1), 287–310. Emanuel, K. A. (1986). An air-sea interaction theory for tropical cyclones. Part I: Steady- state maintenance. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 43(6), 585–605. Emanuel, K. A. (2003). Atmospheric convection. Oxford University Press. Encyclopædia Britannica. (2026). Agonic line. Encyclopædia Britannica. Faber, T. E. (1995). Fluid dynamics for physicists. Cambridge University Press. Fujita, T. T. (1985). The downburst: Microburst and macroburst. University of Chicago Press. Gill, A. E. (1982). Atmosphere-ocean dynamics. Academic Press. Greitzer, E. M., Tan, C. S., & Graf, M. B. (2004). Internal flow: Concepts and applications. Cambridge University Press. Holton, J. R., & Hakim, G. J. (2013). An introduction to dynamic meteorology (5th ed.). Academic Press. Kharif, C., & Pelinovsky, E. (2003). Physical mechanisms of the rogue wave phenomenon. European Journal of Mechanics - B/Fluids, 22(6), 603–634. Kundu, P. K., Cohen, I. M., & Dowling, D. R. (2016). Fluid mechanics (6th ed.). Academic Press. Kusano, K., & Sterling, G. (2019). Dynamic instability of shear currents in boundary layers. Physics of Fluids, 31(4), Article 044101. Lamb, H. (1993). Hydrodynamics (6th ed.). Cambridge University Press. Lighthill, J. (1978). Waves in fluids. Cambridge University Press. Majda, A. J., & Bertozzi, A. L. (2002). Vorticity and incompressible flow. Cambridge University Press. Maus, S., MacMillan, S., Chernova, T., Choi, S., Dater, D., Golovkov, V., Lesur, V., Lowes, F., Lühr, H., & Thebault, E. (2005). The 10th generation International Geomagnetic IJEMT Reference Field. Geophysical Journal International, 163(1), 160–163. May, D. A., & Monaghan, J. J. (2003). Can a single bubble sink a ship? American Journal of Physics, 71(9), 842–849 Mayell, H. (2003). Bermuda Triangle: Mystery solved? National Geographic News. McWilliams, J. C. (2006). Fundamentals of geophysical fluid dynamics. Cambridge University Press. Melville, W. K. (1996). The role of wave breaking in air-sea interaction. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 28(1), 279–321. Munk, W. H. (1950). On the wind-driven ocean circulation. Journal of Meteorology, 7(2), 79–93. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. (2024). What is the Bermuda Triangle? National Ocean Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. (2025). What is the Gulf Stream? National Environmental Satellite, Data, and Information Service. Naval History and Heritage Command. (2021). The disappearance of Flight 19 and Training 49—5 December 1945. United States Navy. Onorato, M., Proment, D., & Toffoli, A. (2011). Triggering rogue waves in counter- propagating currents. Physical Review Letters, 107(18), Article 184502. Paull, C. K., Ussler, W., & Dillon, W. P. (2000). Is the Bermuda Triangle a methane hydrate release zone? Geophysical Research Letters, 27(10), 1481–1484. Pedlosky, J. (1987). Geophysical fluid dynamics (2nd ed.). Springer. Philibert, M., & Thorpe, S. A. (2002). On the role of bubble plumes in upper ocean mixing. Journal of Marine Research, 60(2), 241–268. Saffman, P. G. (1992). Vortex dynamics. Cambridge University Press. Stewart, R. H. (2008). Introduction to physical oceanography. Texas A&M University. U.S. Coast Guard. (2023). Bermuda Triangle: Fact and fiction in maritime accidents. United States Coast Guard Historical Office. Vallis, G. K. (2017). Atmospheric and oceanic fluid dynamics: Fundamentals and large-scale circulation (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. White, F. M. (2016). Fluid mechanics (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.