Submit your papersSubmit Now
For Enquiries: [email protected]
IIARD LogoIIARD

Spatially Uniform Plankton Assemblages and A Temperature- Linked Zooplankton Gradient in a Tidal Peri-Urban River of The Niger Delta: The Egbelu Reach of The New Calabar River, Nigeria

Wala Chimela, Onisowurun Tom Lazarus, and Eke-John Honour Chibueze

Abstract

Plankton respond quickly to changes in water quality and are widely used to assess rivers and estuaries. Even so, few Niger Delta studies have related plankton structure to environmental variables measured at the same places and times. We sampled phytoplankton and zooplankton at three stations on the Egbelu reach of the New Calabar River, Rivers State, Nigeria, every month from May to July 2026, and measured eleven physico-chemical variables alongside them. Salinity (0.45–1.88 ppt), conductivity and total dissolved solids differed among stations, while temperature (27.5–28.0 °C) and pH rose over the three months. The phytoplankton count came to 1,171 individuals in 19 taxa from four classes. Bacillariophyceae dominated (68.1%), followed by Cyanophyceae (23.4%), Chlorophyceae (6.3%) and Euglenophyceae (2.1%). Zooplankton numbered 1,124 individuals in 14 taxa: Copepoda (42.6%; five calanoid morphotypes), Cladocera (22.4%), Rotifera (20.2%) and tintinnid Protozoa (14.8%). Both assemblages were diverse and very even (phytoplankton H′ = 2.83–2.85, J′ = 0.96–0.97; zooplankton H′ = 2.60–2.61, J′ = 0.98–0.99), and Bray–Curtis similarity among stations was above 88%. For both groups, cluster analysis set Station 1 apart from Stations 2 and 3. In canonical correspondence analysis, temperature defined the first axis for both groups, but the model was significant only for zooplankton (52.8% of inertia constrained; p = 0.044), not for phytoplankton (p = 0.299). In the early rainy season, plankton composition in this reach followed temperature and sampling month more closely than it followed the spatial differences in water chemistry.

Keywords

phytoplankton; zooplankton; canonical correspondence analysis; bioindicators; tidal river; Niger Delta P-ISSN 2695-222X

References

APHA. (2017). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater (23rd ed.). American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association and Water Environment Federation. Bellinger, E. G., & Sigee, D. C. (2015). Freshwater algae: Identification, enumeration and use as bioindicators (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell. Birk, S., Chapman, D., Carvalho, L., Spears, B. M., Andersen, H. E., Argillier, C., Auer, S., Baattrup-Pedersen, A., Banin, L., Beklioğlu, M., Bondar-Kunze, E., Borja, A., Branco, P., Bucak, T., Buijse, A. D., Cardoso, A. C., Couture, R.-M., Cremona, F., de Zwart, D., ... Hering, D. (2020). Impacts of multiple stressors on freshwater biota across spatial scales and ecosystems. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 4(8), 1060–1068. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-1216-4 Boltovskoy, D. (Ed.). (1999). South Atlantic zooplankton. Backhuys Publishers. Bray, J. R., & Curtis, J. T. (1957). An ordination of the upland forest communities of southern Wisconsin. Ecological Monographs, 27(4), 325–349. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942268 Davies, I. C., & Ekperusi, A. O. (2021). Evaluation of heavy metal concentrations in water, sediment and fishes of New Calabar River in southern Nigeria. Journal of Limnology and Freshwater Fisheries Research, 7(3), 207–218. Dienye, H. E., & Woke, G. N. (2015). Physico-chemical parameters of the upper and lower reach of the New Calabar River, Niger Delta. Journal of Fisheries & Livestock Production, 3, 154. Edmondson, W. T. (Ed.). (1959). Freshwater biology (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons. Elliott, M., & Quintino, V. (2007). The estuarine quality paradox, environmental homeostasis and the difficulty of detecting anthropogenic stress in naturally stressed areas. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 54(6), 640–645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2007.02.003 Hammer, Ø., Harper, D. A. T., & Ryan, P. D. (2001). PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica, 4(1), 1–9. Huisman, J., Codd, G. A., Paerl, H. W., Ibelings, B. W., Verspagen, J. M. H., & Visser, P. M. (2018). Cyanobacterial blooms. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 16(8), 471–483. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-018-0040-1 Imachrist, I. D., Sikoki, F. D., Kika, P., & Chris, D. I. (2024). Biological significances of environmental pollution in the New Calabar River, southern Nigeria: a case study in zooplankton composition. Journal of Bioresource Management, 11(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.35691/JBM.4202.0016 Jeppesen, E., Nõges, P., Davidson, T. A., Haberman, J., Nõges, T., Blank, K., Lauridsen, T. L., Søndergaard, M., Sayer, C., Laugaste, R., Johansson, L. S., Bjerring, R., & Amsinck, S. L. (2011). Zooplankton as indicators in lakes: A scientific-based plea for including zooplankton in the ecological quality assessment of lakes according to the European Water Framework Directive . Hydrobiologia, 676(1), 279–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-011-0831-0 Legendre, P., & Legendre, L. (2012). Numerical ecology (3rd English ed.). Elsevier. Margalef, R. (1958). Information theory in ecology. General Systems, 3, 36–71. Murphy, J., & Riley, J. P. (1962). A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Analytica Chimica Acta, 27, 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(00)88444-5 Nwibani, B. H., Olagbemiro, T. O., Bob-Manuel, K. N. O., & Uyi, H. (2025). Assessment of physicochemical characteristics and subtidal benthic macroinvertebrate communities in Luubara Creek and New Calabar River, situated in the Niger Delta region of Nigeria. Journal of Applied Sciences and Environmental Management, 29(5), 1512–1521. https://doi.org/10.4314/jasem.v29i5.16 P-ISSN 2695-222X Oksanen, J., Simpson, G. L., Blanchet, F. G., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., Minchin, P. R., O’Hara, R. B., Solymos, P., Stevens, M. H. H., Szoecs, E., Wagner, H., Barbour, M., Bedward, M., Bolker, B., Borcard, D., Carvalho, G., Chirico, M., De Cáceres, M., Durand, S., ... Weedon, J. (2022). vegan: Community ecology package (R package version 2.6-4) [Computer software]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan Pielou, E. C. (1966). The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 13, 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022- 5193(66)90013-0 R Core Team. (2023). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/ Reid, A. J., Carlson, A. K., Creed, I. F., Eliason, E. J., Gell, P. A., Johnson, P. T. J., Kidd, K. A., MacCormack, T. J., Olden, J. D., Ormerod, S. J., Smol, J. P., Taylor, W. W., Tockner, K., Vermaire, J. C., Dudgeon, D., & Cooke, S. J. (2019). Emerging threats and persistent conservation challenges for freshwater biodiversity. Biological Reviews, 94(3), 849–873. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12480 Reynolds, C. S. (2006). The ecology of phytoplankton. Cambridge University Press. Richardson, A. J. (2008). In hot water: zooplankton and climate change. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 65(3), 279–295. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsn028 Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press. Simpson, E. H. (1949). Measurement of diversity. Nature, 163, 688. https://doi.org/10.1038/163688a0 Sneath, P. H. A., & Sokal, R. R. (1973). Numerical taxonomy: The principles and practice of numerical classification. W. H. Freeman. Telesh, I. V., & Khlebovich, V. V. (2010). Principal processes within the estuarine salinity gradient: a review. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 61(4–6), 149–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2010.02.008 ter Braak, C. J. F. (1986). Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology, 67(5), 1167–1179. https://doi.org/10.2307/1938672 ter Braak, C. J. F., & Verdonschot, P. F. M. (1995). Canonical correspondence analysis and related multivariate methods in aquatic ecology. Aquatic Sciences, 57(3), 255–289. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00877430 Tukey, J. W. (1949). Comparing individual means in the analysis of variance. Biometrics, 5(2), 99–114. https://doi.org/10.2307/3001913 P-ISSN 2695-222X