Distribution and Determinant of Caesarean Section Among Women of Reproductive Age

Prof. Anthony; I.; Wegbom; Aboko; Igboye Simon

doi:10.56201/ijmepr.v10.no6.2026.pg54.69

📄 Download Paper

Distribution and Determinant of Caesarean Section Among Women of Reproductive Age

Prof. Anthony, I., Wegbom, Aboko, Igboye Simon

Abstract

Caesarean section (CS) delivery remains one of the most important lifesaving obstetric interventions for reducing maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality when medically indicated. Irrespective of global efforts to improve access to emergency obstetric care, the utilization of caesarean section in Nigeria remains low and unevenly distributed across socioeconomic, residential, and regional populations. This study therefore examined the distribution and determinants of caesarean section among women of Reproductive Age. Data for the study were obtained from the Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey (NDHS 2023– 24), a nationally representative survey involving 42,000 women aged 15–49 years. The survey adopted a stratified two-stage cluster sampling technique to ensure national representativeness. Descriptive statistics were used to examine the distribution of caesarean section delivery across selected socio-demographic characteristics, while multilevel logistic regression analysis was employed to identify individual-, household-, and community-level determinants of caesarean section delivery. Measures of inequality were used to assess rural–urban differentials in caesarean section utilization. The findings revealed that a majority of the respondents were aged 35–39 years (21.64%), 46.56% had no formal education, while 59.38% had five or more children. The prevalence of caesarean section delivery in Nigeria was 5.60% (95% CI: 5.25–5.96). Caesarean section delivery was significantly higher among urban women (10.02%; 95% CI: 9.29–10.79) compared to rural women (2.81%; 95% CI: 2.50–3.16). The inequality analysis further showed an absolute rural–urban difference of 6.97 percentage points (RD = 6.97; 95% CI: 5.48–8.45), while urban women were approximately four times more likely to undergo caesarean delivery than rural women (PR = 3.68; 95% CI: 2.88–4.70). At the multivariate level, women with higher education were significantly more likely to undergo caesarean section delivery (aIRR = 5.73; 95% CI: 4.56–7.19) compared with women with no formal education. Community-level media exposure also significantly increased the likelihood of caesarean section delivery, particularly among women residing in communities with medium media exposure (AOR =

Keywords

Caesarean section deliveryMaternal healthcare utilizationRural–urban inequalitiesEmergency obstetric care

References

Adedini, S. A., Odimegwu, C., Imasiku, E. N., & Ononokpono, D. N. (2018). Unmet need for family planning: Implication for under-five mortality in Nigeria. Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition, 37(1), 13. Adewuyi, E. O., Auta, A., Khanal, V., Bamidele, O. D., & Zhao, Y. (2019). Caesarean delivery in Nigeria: Prevalence and associated factors. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 19(1), 1– 12. Babalola, S., & Fatusi, A. (2019). Determinants of use of maternal health services in Nigeria— Looking beyond individual and household factors. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 9, Article 43. Boatin, A. A., Schlotheuber, A., Betrán, A. P., Moller, A. B., Barros, A. J. D., & Boerma, T. (2018). Within-country inequalities in caesarean section rates. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 125(3), 267–272. Boerma, T., Ronsmans, C., Melesse, D. Y., Barros, A. J. D., Barros, F. C., Juan, L., & Victora, C. G. (2018). Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections. The Lancet, 392(10155), 1341–1348. Cavallaro, F. L., Cresswell, J. A., França, G. V. A., Victora, C. G., Barros, A. J. D., & Ronsmans, C. (2017). Trends in caesarean delivery by country and wealth quintile. The Lancet Global Health, 5(10) Doctor, H. V., Findley, S. E., Ager, A., Cometto, G., Afenyadu, G. Y., Adamu, F., & Green, C. (2018). Using community-based research to shape maternal health policy in Northern Nigeria. Reproductive Health Matters, 26(54), 141–150. Kozhimannil, Attanasio, L., & K. B. (2018). Relationship between hospital-level percentage of midwife-attended births and obstetric procedure utilization. Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health, 63(1), 14–22. National Population Commission [Nigeria] & ICF. (2019). Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey 2018. NPC and ICF. Osaro, B. O., Edet, C. K., Onyema, C., George, B. I., & Wegbom, A. I. (2023). Unmet needs of caesarean section in Nigeria: What are the prevalence and regional inequalities. Nigerian Medical Journal, 64(1), 147. Owoo, N. S. (2021). Demographic considerations and food security in Nigeria. Journal of Social and Economic Development, 23, 128–167. Singh, S., & Malhotra, A. K. (2021). A cross-sectional study on factors influencing caesarean section rates in a tertiary care hospital, Jhansi (Uttar Pradesh). International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health, 8(9), 4404–4410. World Health Organization. (2015). WHO statement on caesarean section rates. WHO. World Health Organization. (2016). WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience. WHO. World Health Organization. (2018). WHO recommendations: Non-clinical interventions to reduce unnecessary caesarean sections. WHO. World Health Organization. (2021). Caesarean section rates continue to rise amid growing inequalities in access. WHO. World Health Organization. (2022). WHO statement on caesarean section rates. WHO.

Distribution and Determinant of Caesarean Section Among Women of Reproductive Age

Abstract

Keywords

References

More Articles from INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EVALUATION AND PHYSICAL REPORT