Submit your papersSubmit Now
For Enquiries: [email protected]
IIARD LogoIIARD

Comparative IVF And Embryo Development Performance of Environmentally Adapted and Conventional Cattle Genetics Under Heat Stress Conditions

Jessica Okonkwo, Confidence John, Olorunnisola Adeola Oluwasegun

Abstract

Comparisons between environmentally adapted and conventional cattle genetics under heat stress are reported unevenly across the in vitro fertilization literature: some trials expose oocytes to heat only during maturation, others expose the resulting embryo only during culture, and few hold genetic group, heat-challenge stage, and endpoint definition constant within a single comparative design. This inconsistency makes it difficult to state, with laboratory-level precision, at which stage of oocyte maturation, fertilization, or embryo culture a thermotolerance advantage for environmentally adapted genetics actually operates, and whether an advantage measured at cleavage persists to blastocyst and to post-thaw survival. This paper specifies a stage-resolved comparative protocol for in vitro maturation, fertilization, and culture performance between environmentally adapted (Bos indicus-influenced) and conventional (Bos taurus) cattle genetics under controlled heat challenge, without reporting completed trial results. The protocol separates three challenge points, oocyte maturation, fertilization, and post- fertilization culture, and specifies cleavage rate, blastocyst rate, embryo grade, and post- vitrification survival as a linked outcome cascade rather than independent endpoints. A cellular mechanism review grounds the comparison in heat-shock protein expression, reactive oxygen species accumulation, and mitochondrial function, and a donor-management covariate set controls for body condition and nutritional status so that genetic comparisons are not confounded by donor herd management. The central proposition is that any thermotolerance advantage for environmentally adapted genetics is stage-specific rather than uniform across the in vitro production sequence, such that a genetic group favored at maturation is not automatically favored at culture or at cryopreservation, and that comparative trials reporting only a single pooled endpoint will misattribute stage-specific effects to genetics as a whole. Falsifiable hypotheses, quality-control standards, and a reporting checklist for stage-resolved comparative embryo trials close the paper.

References

Behboodi, E., Gutiérrez-Adán, A., & Anderson, G. B. (1997). Inadvertent sex selection in a protocol of in vitro bovine embryo production. Theriogenology, 47(1), 265. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0093-691x(97)82392-8 Brackett, B. G., & Keskintepe, L. (1996). Defined sperm treatments and insemination conditions enable improved bovine embryo production in vitro. Theriogenology, 45(1), 259. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691x(96)84732-7 Burns, G., Suchodolski, P. F., Pearks Wilkerson, A. J., & Long, C. (2010). 248 PRODUCTION OF FLAGGED RECOMBINANT BOVINE BMP15 TO IMPROVE BOVINE IN VITRO EMBRYO PRODUCTION SYSTEMS. Reproduction, Fertility and Development, 23(1), 222-222. https://doi.org/10.1071/rdv23n1ab248 Dalvit, G. C., Cetica, P. D., Pintos, L. N., & Beconi, M. T. (2005). Brief Note: Reactive oxygen species in bovine embryo in vitro production. BIOCELL, 29(2), 209-212. https://doi.org/10.32604/biocell.2005.29.209 De Rensis, F., et al. (2015). Seasonal heat stress: clinical implications and hormone treatments for fertility. Theriogenology, 84, 659-666. Diskin, M. G., and Morris, D. G. (2008). Embryonic and early foetal losses in cattle. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 43, 260-267. Dorice, A. K., Ferdinand, N., Justin, K., Augustave, K., & Linda, K. K. (2019). Effects of Breed, Age, Body Condition Score, and Nutritional Status on Follicular Population, Oocyte Yield, and Quality in Three Cameroonian Zebus CattleBos indicus. Advances in Agriculture, 2019, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2979740 Eberhardt, B. G., Satrapa, R. A., Capinzaiki, C. R. L., Trinca, L. A., & Barros, C. M. (2009). Influence of the breed of bull (Bos taurus indicus vs. Bos taurus taurus) and the breed of cow (Bos taurus indicus, Bos taurus taurus and crossbred) on the resistance of bovine embryos to heat. Animal Reproduction Science, 114(1-3), 54-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2008.09.008 Fabres, C., Fernández, E., Zegers-Hochschild, F., Mackenna, A., & Crosby, J. A. (2012). First polar body genetic diagnosis as a selection tool of euploid oocytes before insemination. JBRA Assisted Reproduction, 16(4). https://doi.org/10.5935/1518- 0557.2012.16.4.03 Fair, T. (2012). Oocyte Development in Cattle: Factors Affecting Competence.. Biology of Reproduction, 87(Suppl_1), 12-12. https://doi.org/10.1093/biolreprod/87.s1.12 Forbes, T. J., & Jackson, N. (1971). A STUDY OF THE UTILIZATION OF SILAGES OF DIFFERENT DRY-MATTER CONTENT BY YOUNG BEEF CATTLE WITH OR WITHOUT SUPPLEMENTARY BARLEY. Grass and Forage Science, 26(4), 257-264. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.1971.tb00673.x Gad-Elkareem, R. (2021). In vitro buffalo embryo production under heat stress: Role of granulosa cells co-culture as a monolayer. Annals of Agricultural Science, Moshtohor, 59(2), 103-104. https://doi.org/10.21608/assjm.2021.183715 Gandolfi, F. (1996). Intra-ovarian regulation oocyte developmental competence in cattle. Zygote, 4(4), 323-326. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0967199400003336 Göktepe Turhan, C., & Çetin, Y. (2025). The effect of selection of immature bovine oocytes with brillant cresyl blue stain on embryo development rates. Mediterranean Veterinary Journal, 10(3), 529-534. https://doi.org/10.24880/meditvetj.1657926 Hansen, P. J. (2009). Effects of heat stress on mammalian reproduction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 364, 3341-3350. Hasler, J. F. (1998). The Current Status of Oocyte Recovery, In Vitro Embryo Production, and Embryo Transfer in Domestic Animals, with an Emphasis on the Bovine. Journal of Animal Science, 76(suppl_3), 52. https://doi.org/10.2527/1998.76suppl_352x Hazel, L. N. (1943). The genetic basis for constructing selection indexes. Genetics, 28, 476-490. Hersom, M. J., & Thrift, T. A. (2018). How to Measure Body Condition Score in Florida Beef Cattle. EDIS, 2018(4). https://doi.org/10.32473/edis-an347-2018 Hill, B. R., & Kuehner, L. F. (1998). Bovine donor blood cholesterol, embryo colour and embryo freezability. Theriogenology, 49(1), 168. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0093-691x(98)90521-0 Hitit, M., Schindler, J., Memili, E., Parrish, J. J., & Kaya, A. (2023). Melatonin Protects Bovine Embryos from Heat Stress and Oxygen Tension and Improves Embryo Production In vitro. Kafkas Universitesi Veteriner Fakultesi Dergisi. https://doi.org/10.9775/kvfd.2023.29560 Hoshi, H. (2003). In vitro production of bovine embryos and their application for embryo transfer. Theriogenology, 59(2), 675-685. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0093-691x(02)01247- 5 Hutton, S., Semple, E., Leibo, S. P., & Betteridge, K. J. (1997). Production of frozen Bos indicus × Bos taurus embryos from oocytes recovered from slaughtered Bos taurus cows. Theriogenology, 47(1), 289. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0093-691x(97)82416-8 Imron, M., Boediono, A., & Supriatna, I. (2012). Viability of bovine demi embryo after splitting of fresh and frozen thawed embryo derived from in vitro embryo production. Jurnal Ilmu Ternak dan Veteriner, 12(2), 118-123. https://doi.org/10.14334/jitv.v12i2.549 Kaaekuahiwi, M. A., & Menino, A. R. (1990). Relationship between plasminogen activator production and bovine embryo development in vitro.. Journal of Animal Science, 68(7), 2009. https://doi.org/10.2527/1990.6872009x Kasimanickam, R., et al. (2021). Impact of heat stress on embryonic development during early pregnancy in cattle. Scientific Reports, 11. Katjiua, M., & Ward, D. (2006). Cattle diet selection during the hot-dry season in a semi-arid region of Namibia. African Journal of Range & Forage Science, 23(1), 59-67. https://doi.org/10.2989/10220110609485887 Kayar, T., & Erzurum, O. (2025). Effects of body condition score on milk yield and calf birth weight in dairy cattle. Journal of Advances in VetBio Science and Techniques, 10(1), 60- 65. https://doi.org/10.31797/vetbio.1638660 Keady, T. W. J., Murphy, J. J., & Harrington, D. (1996). The effects of ensiling on dry-matter intake and milk production by lactating dairy cattle given forage as the sole feed. Grass and Forage Science, 51(2), 131-141. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.1996.tb02047.x Keady, T. W. J., & Steen, R. W. J. (1994). Effects of treating low dry-matter grass with a bacterial inoculant on the intake and performance of beef cattle and studies on its mode of action. Grass and Forage Science, 49(4), 438-446. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365- 2494.1994.tb02021.x Keady, T. W. J., & Steen, R. W. J. (1995). The effects of treating low dry-matter, low digestibility grass with a bacterial inoculant on the intake and performance of beef cattle, and studies on its mode of action. Grass and Forage Science, 50(3), 217-226. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.1995.tb02317.x Liu, D., He, D., & Norton, T. (2020). Automatic estimation of dairy cattle body condition score from depth image using ensemble model. Biosystems Engineering, 194, 16-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2020.03.011 Liu, S., Yi, J., & Yang, L. (2013). Genetic parameters estimates for locomotion score, body condition score and final type score of Holstein cattle in southern China. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 41(2), 240-243. https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2012.739090 Madison, V., Avery, B., & Greve, T. (1992). Selection of immature bovine oocytes for developmental potential in vitro. Animal Reproduction Science, 27(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4320(92)90065-l Marinho, L., Sanches, B., Rosa, C., Tannura, J., Rigo, A., Basso, A., Pontes, J., & Seneda, M. (2015). Pregnancy Rates to Fixed Embryo Transfer of Vitrified IVP Bos indicus, Bos taurus or Bos indicus × Bos taurus Embryos. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 50(5), 807-811. https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.12591 Martins, A., Keskintepe, L., & Brackett, B. G. (1998). Use of recombinant gonadotropins for bovine embryo production in vitro. Theriogenology, 49(1), 292. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0093-691x(98)90645-8 Mendez, Y., Parra, N., Baez, F., Valeris, R., & Villamediana, P. (2018). Lipid content, mitochondrial activity and early embryo development in oocyte collected from crossbred cows (bos taurus indicus) Contenido lipídico, actividad mitocondrial y desarrollo embrionario temprano de ovocitos provenientes de vacas mestizas (bos taurus indicus) Conteúdo lipídico, atividade mitocondrial e desenvolvimiento embrionário precoce de oócitos coletados de vacas mestiças (bos taurus indicus). Veterinária e Zootecnia, 25(1), 120-131. https://doi.org/10.35172/rvz.2018.v25.27 Merton, J. S., van Dillen, J. A. W., Hasler, J. F., & den Daas, J. H. G. (1995). Effect of culture media and CO2 concentration on embryo development in a bovine embryo in vitro production system. Theriogenology, 43(1), 280. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093- 691x(95)92434-b Merton, J. S., Ask, B., Onkundi, D. C., Mullaart, E., Colenbrander, B., & Nielen, M. (2009). Genetic parameters for oocyte number and embryo production within a bovine ovum pick-up-in vitro production embryo-production program. Theriogenology, 72(7), 885- 893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2009.06.003 Meuwissen, T. H. E., Hayes, B. J., and Goddard, M. E. (2001). Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics, 157, 1819-1829. Miller, S. (2022). Genomic selection in beef cattle creates additional opportunities for embryo technologies to meet industry needs. Reproduction, Fertility and Development, 35(2), 98- 105. https://doi.org/10.1071/rd22233 Montanari Razza, E., Satrapa, R. A., Emanuelli, I. P., Moraes Barros, C., & Nogueira, M. F. G. (2011). 61 DIPLOID (BOS TAURUS) AND TETRAPLOID (BOS INDICUS) EMBRYO AGGREGATION TO PRODUCE BOVINE EMBRYONIC CHIMERAS. Reproduction, Fertility and Development, 24(1), 142-143. https://doi.org/10.1071/rdv24n1ab61 Montiel, F., Galina, C., Rubio, I., & Corro, M. (2006). Factors Affecting Pregnancy Rate of Embryo Transfer inBos indicusandBos taurus/Bos indicuscows. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 29(2), 149-152. https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2006.9706592 Nasser, L. F., Reis, E. L., Oliveira, M. A., Bó, G. A., & Baruselli, P. S. (2004). Comparison of four synchronization protocols for fixed-time bovine embryo transfer in Bos indicus × Bos taurus recipients. Theriogenology, 62(9), 1577-1584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.03.013 Nephawe, K. A., Cundiff, L. V., Dikeman, M. E., Crouse, J. D., & Van Vleck, L. D. (2004). Genetic relationships between sex-specific traits in beef cattle: Mature weight, weight adjusted for body condition score, height and body condition score of cows, and carcass traits of their steer relatives1. Journal of Animal Science, 82(3), 647-653. https://doi.org/10.2527/2004.823647x Nongcula, V., Zhou, L., Nhundu, K., & Jaja, I. (2017). Association between the Prevalence of Indigestible Foreign Objects in the Gastrointestinal Tract of Slaughtered Cattle and Body Condition Score. Animals, 7(11), 80. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani7110080 Ojo, T. O., et al. (2025). Genetic analysis of the impact of heat stress on fertility traits in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science. Oyelade, O., & Ohanebo, C. G. (2024). Prenatal and early-life exposure to PFAS and developmental health outcomes. International Journal of Scientific Research in Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(2), 1077-1110. https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRSSH242780 Oyelade, O., & Ohanebo, C. G. (2025). Comprehensive evaluation of PFAS contamination in U.S. drinking water systems and its implications for human health in marginalized communities. International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 11(4), 654-690. https://doi.org/10.32628/CSEIT251116282 Oyharçabal, E., Covacevich, F., Bain, I., Acuña, C. S., & Berone, G. D. (2024). Cattle dry manure fertilization increases forage yield of grass-legume mixtures, while maintaining the legume proportion and root-associated microbiota. Grass and Forage Science, 79(2), 281-293. https://doi.org/10.1111/gfs.12656 Özturan, Y. N. A., & Akın, B. (2025). Insights into Lameness in Dairy Cattle: The Role of Body Condition Score and Lactation Dynamics. Veterinary Sciences and Practices, 20(2), 64- 70. https://doi.org/10.17094/vetsci.1676194 Pontes, J. H. F., Silva, K. C. F., Basso, A. C., Rigo, A. G., Ferreira, C. R., Santos, G. M. G., Sanches, B. V., Porcionato, J. P. F., Vieira, P. H. S., Faifer, F. S., Sterza, F. A. M., Schenk, J. L., & Seneda, M. M. (2010). Large-scale in vitro embryo production and pregnancy rates from Bos taurus, Bos indicus, and indicus-taurus dairy cows using sexed sperm. Theriogenology, 74(8), 1349-1355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.06.004 Rae, D. O., Kunkle, W. E., Chenoweth, P. J., Sand, R. S., & Tran, T. (1993). Relationship of parity and body condition score to pregnancy rates in Florida beef cattle. Theriogenology, 39(5), 1143-1152. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691x(93)90013-u Rinell, E., & Heringstad, B. (2018). The effects of crossbreeding with Norwegian Red dairy cattle on common postpartum diseases, fertility and body condition score. Animal, 12(12), 2619-2626. https://doi.org/10.1017/s175173111800037x Roche, J. R., Macdonald, K. A., Burke, C. R., Lee, J. M., & Berry, D. P. (2007). Associations Among Body Condition Score, Body Weight, and Reproductive Performance in Seasonal-Calving Dairy Cattle. Journal of Dairy Science, 90(1), 376-391. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(07)72639-5 Roche, J. R., et al. (2009). Invited review: body condition score and its association with dairy cow productivity. Journal of Dairy Science, 92, 5769-5801. Roth, Z. (2017). Effect of heat stress on reproduction in dairy cows. Animal Frontiers, 7, 36-39. Ryan, D. P., Blakewood, E. G., Lynn, J. W., Munyakazi, L., & Godke, R. A. (1992). Effect of heat-stress on bovine embryo development in vitro. Journal of Animal Science, 70(11), 3490-3497. https://doi.org/10.2527/1992.70113490x Sandal, A. Z. (2020). In Vitro Bovine Embryo Production: The Role of FCS and Cysteamine on Cleavage Rate. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi. https://doi.org/10.34087/cbusbed.624912 Scriven, P. N., Ogilvie, C. M., & Khalaf, Y. (2012). Embryo selection in IVF: is polar body array comparative genomic hybridization accurate enough?. Human Reproduction, 27(4), 951- 953. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/des017 Sekine, J., Ueda, J., Hai, J., Kamel, H., Oura, R., & Morita, Z. (1995a). Effects of chemical and physical characteristics of forage on dry-matter intake of cattle. Annales de Zootechnie, 44(Suppl. 1), 253-253. https://doi.org/10.1051/animres:199505218 Sekine, J., Ueda, J., Hai, J., Kamel, H., Oura, R., & Morita, Z. (1995b). Effects of chemical and physical characteristics of forage on dry-matter intake of cattle. CrossRef Listing Of Deleted DOIs, 44(Suppl. 1), 253-253. https://doi.org/10.1051/rnd:199505art0218 Sharma, V. (2020). Effect of Body Condition Score on Production Performance of Sahiwal Cattle. Journal of Animal Research, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.30954/2277- 940x.01.2020.7 Shulman, L. P. (2012). Embryo selection in IVF: is polar body array comparative genomic hybridization accurate enough?. Yearbook of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, 2012, 248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yobg.2012.06.024 Singh, V., Choudhary, P., & Kumar Jhirwal, A. (2020). Impact of Body Condition Score on Performance of Sahiwal Cattle. Acta Scientific Veterinary Sciences, 2(7), 01-02. https://doi.org/10.31080/asvs.2020.02.0071 Sirard, M. A. (2018). 40 years of bovine IVF in the new genomic selection context. Reproduction, 156(1), R1-R7. https://doi.org/10.1530/rep-18-0008 Subramaniam, A., Devarajan, K. P., & Mohanan, M. (1991). Repeat flushing and embryo recovery in cross-bred donor cows (Bos indicus × Bos taurus). Theriogenology, 35(1), 277. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691x(91)90253-a Terramoccia, S., Bartocci, S., Amici, A., & Martillotti, F. (2000). Protein and protein-free dry matter rumen degradability in buffalo, cattle and sheep fed diets with different forage to concentrate ratios. Livestock Production Science, 65(1-2), 185-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0301-6226(99)00155-4 Thompson, J. G., & Duganzich, D. (1996). Analysis of culture systems for bovine in vitro embryo production reported in abstracts of the proceedings of the International Embryo Transfer Society (1991-1995). Theriogenology, 45(1), 195. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093- 691x(96)84668-1 Weller, J. I., & Ezra, E. (2025). Genetic analysis of body condition score in the Israeli Holstein dairy cattle population. Journal of Dairy Science, 108(6), 6151-6160. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2024-25473 Wolfenson, D., and Roth, Z. (2019). Impact of heat stress on cow reproduction and fertility. Animal Frontiers, 9, 32-38. Yoottasano, C., Pholsen, S., & Higgs, D. E. B. (2015). Dry Matter Yields and Forage Quality of Grass Alone and Grass Plus Legume Mixture in Relation to Cattle Manure Rates and Production Methods. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 18(7), 324-332. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2015.324.332