Submit your papersSubmit Now
For Enquiries: [email protected]
IIARD LogoIIARD

The Role of Social Support Systems in the Reintegration of Ex- Offenders in Nigeria: A Family–Community–Government Framework

Onen Iwara Eno, B.Sc., M.Sc.

Abstract

This conceptual review examines the role of social support systems in the reintegration of ex- offenders in Nigeria, with particular attention to family, community and government. Reintegration is understood as a continuing process that begins before release and extends into the community through relationships, accommodation, employment, education, counselling, supervision and social acceptance. Drawing on Social Support Theory, desistance and life- course perspectives, labelling theory, and the reintegration literature, the paper argues that correctional rehabilitation cannot achieve durable outcomes when post-release social conditions remain unstable. Family support can provide belonging, emotional assistance, accommodation and accountability; communities can provide acceptance, mentorship and legitimate social networks; and government can provide policy, institutional coordination, resources and aftercare. Major barriers include unemployment, housing insecurity, family rejection, stigma, substance misuse, weak aftercare and limited access to education and skills. The paper proposes a Family–Community–Government Reintegration Framework built around pre-release preparation, coordinated post-release case management, employment and entrepreneurship pathways, family counselling, community-based support, non-custodial measures and outcome monitoring. The paper is conceptual and does not report fabricated primary survey findings. It recommends that future Nigerian research empirically test the proposed framework using verified field data.

Keywords

Social support; reintegration; ex-offenders; reentry; family; community; government; Nigerian Correctional Service; recidivism

References

Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 310–357. Laub, J. H., & Sampson, R. J. (1993). Turning points in the life course: Why change matters to the study of crime. Criminology, 31(3), 301–325. Martinez, D. J. (2006). Informal helping mechanisms: Conceptual issues in family support of reentry of former prisoners. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 44(1), 23–37. Mowen, T. J., & Visher, C. A. (2019). Family matters: Moving beyond “if” family support matters to “why” family support matters during reentry from prison. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency. Naser, R. L., & La Vigne, N. G. (2006). Family support in the prisoner reentry process: Expectations and realities. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 43(1), 93–106. Pager, D. (2003). The mark of a criminal record. American Journal of Sociology, 108(5), 937– 975. Taylor, C. J. (2016). The family's role in the reintegration of formerly incarcerated individuals: The direct effects of emotional support. The Prison Journal, 96(3). United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2018). Introductory handbook on the prevention of recidivism and the social reintegration of offenders. United Nations. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2023). Preparation for release and reintegration into society: Model strategy No. 9. Visher, C. A., Winterfield, L., & Coggeshall, M. B. (2006). Systematic review of noncustodial employment programs: Impact on recidivism rates of ex-offenders. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 2(1), 1–28.

More Articles from JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL POLICY