Public Administration and Conflict Resolution: Bridging Governance Theories and Practices: A Case Study of Nigeria's Public Sector

Love Obiani Arugu Ph.D; Okpokpo Soberrekon Emmanuel

doi:10.56201/jpaswr.v11.no8.2026.pg71.86

📄 Download Paper

Public Administration and Conflict Resolution: Bridging Governance Theories and Practices: A Case Study of Nigeria's Public Sector

Love Obiani Arugu Ph.D, Okpokpo Soberrekon Emmanuel

Abstract

Conflict is an inescapable feature of organisational life, and nowhere is this more evident than in the public sector, where competing interests, scarce resources, and diverse stakeholders converge. This paper examines the relationship between public administration and conflict resolution in Nigeria, arguing that effective governance depends on the capacity of public institutions to anticipate, manage, and resolve conflict rather than merely suppress it. Adopting a qualitative, desk-based research design, the study reviews existing theoretical and empirical literature on conflict in Nigeria's public administration, spanning intra-organisational disputes within the civil service, inter-governmental frictions, and ethno-communal conflicts mediated through local government structures. The paper is anchored on institutional theory, the human relations perspective, and systems theory, which together illuminate how formal structures, interpersonal dynamics, and interdependent institutional processes jointly shape conflict outcomes in bureaucratic settings. Findings from the literature indicate that conflict in Nigeria's public administration is frequently rooted in weak institutional design, poor communication, resource scarcity, ethnic and communal cleavages, unmet development expectations, contested electoral legitimacy at the local government level, and inconsistent application of grievance-redress mechanisms. The paper argues for a deliberate bridging of governance theory and administrative practice through institutionalised, proactive, and context-sensitive conflict-resolution mechanisms rather than ad hoc, reactive interventions. It concludes with recommendations for strengthening internal dispute-resolution systems, empowering traditional and community-based mediation structures, improving the transparency of local government resource delivery, and embedding conflict-sensitivity into public sector training and reform agendas, so that conflict resolution is treated as a core, ongoing competency of governance rather than an occasional administrative response to crisis.

Keywords

Public Administration; Conflict Resolution; Governance; Local Government; Nigeria; Institutional Theory jpaswr =

References

Afolabi, T., & Ibe, C. (2021). Fragmented legal frameworks and institutional weakness in Nigeria's public sector conflict resolution. Journal of Administrative Development, 15(2), 45–61. Arugu, L. O. (2020). Performance appraisal as a tool for increased productivity in the Nigerian public service. International Journal of Strategic Research in Public Administration and Organizational Process, 2(1), 81–90. Arugu, L. O., & Eseduwo, F. S. (2014). Poverty and sustainable development in Bayelsa State: A survey of selected communities in Southern Ijaw Local Government of Bayelsa State. International Journal of Advanced Studies in Ecology, Development and Sustainability, 2(1), 81–89. Arugu, L. O., & Nnaa, B. G. (2020). Communication and public service delivery in Nigeria. International Policy Brief. https://internationalpolicybrief.org/wp- content/uploads/2023/10/ARTICLE8-92.pdf Arugu, L. O., & Okoye, A. C. (2013). Local government and rural development in Nigeria: Case study Bayelsa State, 1999–2014. Nigerian Journal of Public Administration and Local Government, 17(1), 154–167. Deutsch, M., & Coleman, P. T. (2000). The handbook of conflict resolution. Jossey-Bass. Diepreye, F. P., & Arugu, L. O. (2025). Local government elections and democratisation in Bayelsa State: A study of the 2024 local election. Journal of Public Administration and Social Welfare Research, 10(2), 79–92. https://doi.org/10.56201/jpaswr.v10.no2.2025.pg79.92 Institute for Peace and Conflict Resolution Nigeria. (n.d.). Institutional mandate and peacebuilding activities. Retrieved August 8, 2026, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Institute_for_Peace_and_Conflict_Resolution_Nigeria Jones, G. R., & George, J. M. (2003). Contemporary management. McGraw-Hill. Mayer, B. (2000). The dynamics of conflict resolution. Jossey-Bass. Mogashoa, T. (2018). Legal autonomy and procedural transparency in South Africa's public sector mediation processes. African Public Sector Review, 15(1), 22–38. Okon, E. (2019). Structural failures and conflict escalation in Nigeria's public administration. Journal of Administrative Development, 14(1), 29–44. Olayiwola, M. (2022). Governance and public sector conflict in sub-Saharan Africa: A systems theory perspective. African Public Sector Review, 19(2), 74–90. Owholo, S. M., & Arugu, L. O. (2025). Corruption and accountability in Nigerian local governance: Policy solutions for transparent administration, 2013–2024. UKR Publisher Journal of Social Science and Humanities. https://ukrpublisher.com/wp- content/uploads/2025/08/Corruption-and-Accountability-in-Nigerian-Local-Governance- .pdf Rahim, M. A. (2010). Managing conflict in organizations (4th ed.). Transaction Publishers. Uzuegbunam, A. O., & Nwofia, J. E. (2014). Ethno-communal conflict and the local government system in Nigeria: A desideratum of peace building. Journal of Scientific Research and Reports, 3(15), 2043–2055.

Public Administration and Conflict Resolution: Bridging Governance Theories and Practices: A Case Study of Nigeria's Public Sector

Abstract

Keywords

References

More Articles from JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION AND SOCIAL WELFARE RESEARCH