Submit your papersSubmit Now
For Enquiries: [email protected]
IIARD LogoIIARD

The Resilient Mercantile Hub: An Evidence-Derived Architectural and Governance Framework for Sustainable Waterfront Regeneration in Port Harcourt, Nigeria

Raymond Iheanyichukwu Mbata

Abstract

This article develops and presents the Resilient Mercantile Hub, a conceptual architectural design framework for sustainable waterfront regeneration in Port Harcourt, Nigeria, synthesising historical building condition data, community survey findings (n = 364), and semi-structured interview testimony from informal traders and built-environment professionals into a coherent, three-zone spatial and governance model. The framework is organised around five empirically derived principles proximate access, flood resilience, incremental formalisation, heritage as asset, and livelihood integration and divides the waterfront into three interlocking spatial zones: Waterfront and Landing (a flood-resilient platform and mangrove buffer), Adaptive Reuse Core (retrofitted colonial warehouses housing trade-specific market halls and upper-floor community infrastructure), and Public Realm and Movement Corridor (an elevated promenade and rain gardens). A Waterfront Community Land Trust governance model, modelled on comparable trusts in Mumbai and Cape Town, addresses the tenure insecurity identified as the binding constraint on private investment. We argue that the framework’s distinguishing methodological contribution is its derivation procedure: every spatial and architectural decision is traced explicitly to a specific, quoted item of empirical evidence a survey percentage, a verbatim trader testimony, or a Building Condition Assessment Matrix score rather than to generic adaptive-reuse or waterfront- regeneration design convention, producing a framework whose design logic is auditable against the data that generated it.

Keywords

conceptual design framework; adaptive reuse; community land trust; flood-resilient architecture; participatory design; mercantile heritage; Port Harcourt

References

Anguelovski, I., Shi, L., Chu, E., Gallagher, D., Goh, K., Lamb, Z., Reeve, K., & Teicher, H. (2019). Equity impacts of urban land use planning for climate adaptation. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 36(4), 333–348. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–91. Ekong, J. M., Ibanga, E. A., & Uwah, A. F. (2020). Climate resilience in coastal urban planning in Nigeria: A case study of Calabar waterfront. Journal of Urban and Regional Planning, 18(3), 120–132. Harvey, D. (2008). The right to the city. New Left Review, 53, 23–40. Langston, C. (2011). Estimating the useful life of buildings. Proceedings of the AUBEA Conference 2011, Gold Coast, Australia. Obinna, V. C., Owei, O. B., & Mark, E. O. (2010). Informal settlements of Port Harcourt and potentials for planned city expansion. Environmental Research Journal, 4(3), 222–228. Ogbonna, D. N., Nnodim, A. U., & Ugwoha, E. (2021). Urban environmental health and housing challenges in waterfront settlements of Port Harcourt, Nigeria. Journal of Environmental Science and Public Health, 5(3), 209–226. Patel, S. (2018). Community land trusts and urban informal settlements: Learning from Mumbai’s Dharavi upgrading programme. Environment and Urbanisation, 30(1), 267–282. Plevoets, B., & Van Cleempoel, K. (2019). Adaptive reuse of the built heritage: Concepts and cases of an emerging discipline. Routledge. Watson, V. (2009). ‘The planned city sweeps the poor away...’: Urban planning and 21st century urbanisation. Progress in Planning, 72(3), 151–193.

More Articles from INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND MODERN TECHNOLOGY