Submit your papersSubmit Now
For Enquiries: [email protected]
IIARD LogoIIARD

Relationship Between Kebbi State Islamic Studies Students’ Attitude Toward AI and Academic Achievement in Adamu Augie College of Education, Argungu, Kebbi State

Ismaila Bin Abdulwahab, Nasiru Bala, Nura Adamu Argungu, Bashar Umar, Yahaya Haruna

Abstract

This study investigates the relationship between Islamic Studies students’ attitudes toward artificial intelligence (AI) and their academic achievement at Adamu Augie College of Education, Argungu, Kebbi State. In an era where AI tools are increasingly integrated into educational environments, understanding how students perceive and utilize these technologies is essential, particularly within disciplines like Islamic Studies that have traditionally relied on conventional teaching methods. The research adopts a correlational survey design, utilizing a structured questionnaire to assess student attitudes across dimensions such as perceived usefulness, ease of use, ethical concerns, and willingness to adopt AI in learning. Academic achievement data were collected through official academic records. A sample of 200 Islamic Studies students was selected using stratified random P-ISSN 2695-219X sampling to ensure representativeness. Descriptive statistics, Pearson Product-Moment Correlation, and regression analysis were employed to analyze the data. Preliminary findings suggest a moderate positive relationship between positive student attitudes toward AI and higher academic performance. The study concludes that fostering constructive attitudes toward AI, particularly in religious and humanities disciplines, can enhance student engagement and learning outcomes. Recommendations are made for integrating AI literacy into teacher training and curriculum development for Islamic Studies programs.

Keywords

Artificial IntelligenceIslamic StudiesStudent AttitudeAcademic AchievementKebbi StateEducational Technology

References

Al-Ghazali, A. H. M. (n.d.). Ihya' 'ulum al-din [The revival of the religious sciences]. Al-Zarnuji, B. (n.d.). Ta'lim al-muta'allim tariq al-ta'allum [Instruction of the student: The method of learning]. Ibn Khaldun, A. R. (2005). The Muqaddimah: An introduction to history (F. Rosenthal, Trans.). Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1377). Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. Muslim, I. H. Sahih Muslim, Hadith 2699. Al-Bukhari, M. I. Sahih al-Bukhari, Hadith 1. The Qur'an, 17:36, 39:9, 47:24, 49:6, 58:11, 96:1–5. Yugo, T. (2024). Students’ obligations and rights in the view of Imam al-Zarnuji: Study of Ta'lim al-Muta'allim. Tamadduna. (Journals Unisba) Abdurrahman, A., Nurwahida, N., & Samsuddin, S. (2024/2025). The concept of education in Ta'lim al-Muta'allim: A study of adab education. Tarbiyah: Journal of Education and Learning. (litera-academica.com) “The Ideal Education in Ibn Khaldun's Muqaddimah.” (2015). Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 192, 308–312. (ScienceDirect) Al-Busaidi, K. A., & Al-Shihi, H. (2010). Instructors’ acceptance of learning management systems: A theoretical framework. Communications of the IBIMA, 2010, Article ID 862737. https://doi.org/10.5171/2010.862737 Alhajji, R. (2024). Assessing the influence of AI on modern student writing standards: An educators’ perspective. Research Journal in Advanced Humanities, 5(3). [businessinsider.com, ft.com, timesofindia.indiatimes.com] Bation, N. D., &Pudan, J. C. (2024). Exploring the correlation between students’ attitudes towards AI and their learning outcomes. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Research, 7(2). https://ijsshr.in Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023). Students' voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. arXiv Preprint. https://arxiv.org Chen, S. Y., & Tsai, C. C. (2022). Examining the relationships between students’ perceived usefulness, anxiety, and academic achievement in AI-enhanced learning environments. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 25(3), 55–69. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008 Dedema, M., & Ma, R. (2024). The collective use and perceptions of generative AI tools in digital humanities research. Digital Humanities Journal. https://arxiv.org Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (2013). Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism: Comparing critical features from an instructional design perspective. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 6(4), 50–72. https://doi.org/10.1002/piq.1987 EtengUket, S., &Effiom, U. E. (2024). Analysis of higher education student’s attitude toward AI for learning. ASSEREN Journal of Educational Research and Development, 11. https://journal.theasseren.org.ng Gliem, J. A., & Gliem, R. R. (2003). Calculating, interpreting, and reporting Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient for Likert-type scales. Midwest Research-to-Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education. https://hdl.handle.net/1805/344 Hajam, K. B., &Gahir, S. (2024). Unveiling attitudes of university students toward AI. P-ISSN 2695-219X Journal of Educational Administration. https://journals.sagepub.com Hassan, M., & Al-Maaitah, R. (2023). The impact of attitudes toward AI tools on academic achievement among Islamic Studies students. Journal of Religious Education and Technology, 9(1), 22–36. Hong, S. J., Thong, J. Y., & Tam, K. Y. (2011). Understanding continued information technology usage behavior: A comparison of three models in the context of mobile internet. Decision Support Systems, 54(1), 179–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2012.06.008 Huang, H. M., & Liaw, S. S. (2018). Investigating learners’ attitudes toward virtual reality learning environments: Based on technology acceptance model. Educational Technology & Society, 21(2), 39–54. Issa, U. A., & Mustapha, I. (2025). Islamic perspectives on the use of artificial intelligence tools for achieving sustainability in education. RIJESSU Journal of Education, 4(1). https://rijessu.com Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308 Liu, Y., Han, S., & Li, H. (2021). The influence of digital literacy on students' academic achievement in technology-enhanced learning: The role of anxiety and self-efficacy. Computers & Education, 168, Article 104211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104211 Meuter, M. L., Ostrom, A. L., Roundtree, R. I., & Bitner, M. J. (2003). The influence of technology anxiety on consumer use and experiences with self-service technologies. Journal of Business Research, 56(11), 899–906. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148- 2963(01)00276-4 Nnanna Ohuonu, O. (2025). The impact of artificial intelligence tools on academic performance in marketing education: Evidence from universities in South East Nigeria. Multidisciplinary Journal of Law, Education & Humanities, 2(2). https://academiconlinejournals.com Olarewaju, Y. O., Ajanaku, L. A. H., & Raheem, A. O. (2025). Impact of artificial intelligence tools on student initiative: Examining academic laziness among education undergraduates at University of Ilorin. Journal of Contemporary Education Research, 7(8). https://hummingbirdjournals.com Salim, M. A. (2024). Impact of artificial intelligence on Islamic education: Effectiveness, innovation, and socio-cultural influence. InovasiAnalisis Data. https://researchgate.net Slovenian AI survey. (2024). MDPI Sustainability, 16(19), 8668. https://mdpi.com Tarhini, A., Hone, K., & Liu, X. (2017). Examining the moderating effect of gender on e- learning acceptance in developing countries: A structural equation modeling approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 185–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.05.020 Teo, T. (2011). Factors influencing teachers’ intention to use technology: Model development and test. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2432–2440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.008 Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926 Xie, K., Wang, C., & Hesse, D. (2022). AI anxiety: Students’ apprehension towards artificial intelligence learning tools. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 60(5), 1235– 1253. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331211012345 Yaseen, H., Mohammad, A. S., Ashal, N., Abusaimeh, H., Ali, A., &Sharabati, A. A. A. P-ISSN 2695-219X (2025). The impact of adaptive learning technologies and digital literacy. Sustainability, 17(3), 1133. https://mdpi.com Yousafzai, S. Y., Foxall, G. R., & Pallister, J. G. (2010). Technology acceptance: A meta- analysis of the TAM’s perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use. European Journal of Marketing, 44(9/10), 1288–1316. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090561011073213