Submit your papersSubmit Now
For Enquiries: [email protected]
IIARD LogoIIARD

AI-Augmented Leadership and Employee Voice Behaviour: Exploring the Roles of Trust and Empowerment

Kingsley Ikwunga Amadi PhD

Abstract

As organisations increasingly embed artificial intelligence (AI) into the routines of leadership, from predictive performance dashboards to AI-assisted feedback and coaching tools, a pressing but underexamined question is how this technological augmentation of leadership shapes employees' willingness to speak up. This paper develops and defends a conceptual model in which AI-augmented leadership predicts employee voice behaviour through two theoretically distinct but interlocking psychological mechanisms: trust in the combined leader- AI system, and psychological empowerment. Drawing on social exchange theory) the integrative model of organisational trust, Spreitzer's theory of psychological empowerment, and the growing empirical literature on trust in artificial intelligence, the paper argues that AI-augmented leadership is neither inherently emancipatory nor inherently silencing; its consequences for voice depend on whether it is experienced by employees as a resource that expands judgement and relational engagement or as a mechanism of algorithmic control that narrows it. The paper further situates trust and empowerment within the longer-standing voice literature on psychological safety and implicit theories of self-censorship, showing how these established constructs sharpen, rather than duplicate, the proposed model. Five research propositions are advanced, a boundary condition involving AI transparency is specified, and a research agenda for empirically testing the model is outlined. The paper contributes to the emerging literature on AI and leadership by reframing the central question from whether AI replaces leaders to how leaders' use of AI is interpreted by employees, and by clarifying the specific psychological pathways through which that interpretation either encourages or forecloses constructive dissent.

Keywords

AI-augmented leadershipemployee voice behaviourtrustpsychological empowermentpsychological safetyalgorithmic controlhuman-AI collaboration

References

Bai, Y., & He, H. (2025). The “double-edged sword” effect of shared leadership on employee voice behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, Article 1560554. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1560554 Baran, M. (2025). AI-augmented leadership: Redefining leaders' style and competencies. In AI and Humanistic Management (pp. 147-169). Routledge Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Wiley. Detert, J. R., & Burris, E. R. (2007). Leadership behavior and employee voice: Is the door really open? Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 869–884. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.26279183 Detert, J. R., & Edmondson, A. C. (2011). Implicit voice theories: Taken-for-granted rules of self-censorship at work. Academy of Management Journal, 54(3), 461–488. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.61967925 Dutta, D., Mishra, S. K., & Tyagi, D. (2023). Augmented employee voice and employee engagement using artificial intelligence-enabled chatbots: A field study. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 34(12), 2451–2480. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2022.2085525 Edmondson, A. C. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999 Gao, A., & Jiang, J. (2019). Perceived empowering leadership, harmonious passion, and employee voice: The moderating role of job autonomy. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 1484. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01484 Glikson, E., & Woolley, A. W. (2020). Human trust in artificial intelligence: Review of empirical research. Academy of Management Annals, 14(2), 627–660. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2018.0057 Hu, Y., Zhu, L., Zhou, M., Li, J., Maguire, P., Sun, H., & Wang, D. (2018). Exploring the influence of ethical leadership on voice behavior: How leader-member exchange, psychological safety and psychological empowerment influence employees’ willingness to speak out. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 1718. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01718 Kellogg, K. C., Valentine, M. A., & Christin, A. (2020). Algorithms at work: The new contested terrain of control. Academy of Management Annals, 14(1), 366–410. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2018.0174 Liu, J., Huang, M., Cui, M., Tian, G., & Li, X. (2025). The positive effects of employee AI dependence on voice behavior—Based on power dependence theory. Behavioral Sciences, 15(12), Article 1709. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15121709 Marangozoglu, S. (2025). Reconstructing Leadership: The Convergence of Leadership Theories and AI-Driven Decision-Making (Doctoral dissertation, Technische Universität Wien). Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734. https://doi.org/10.2307/258792 Morrison, E. W. (2011). Employee voice behavior: Integration and directions for future research. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 373–412. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2011.574506 Morrison, E. W. (2014). Employee voice and silence. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 173–197. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091328 E-ISSN 2504-883X P-ISSN 2695 2432 Morrison, E. W. (2023). Employee voice and silence: Taking stock a decade later. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 10, 79–107. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-054654 Newman, A., Donohue, R., & Eva, N. (2017). Psychological safety: A systematic review of the literature. Human Resource Management Review, 27(3), 521–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.01.001 Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442–1465. https://doi.org/10.2307/256865 Thomas, K. W., & Velthouse, B. A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: An “interpretive” model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 666–681. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1990.4310926 Zhang, Q., Wang, F., Liao, G., & Li, M. (2025). How does AI trust foster innovative performance under paternalistic leadership? The roles of AI crafting and leader’s AI opportunity perception. Behavioral Sciences, 15(8), Article 1064. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15081064 Zhang, X., Yu, D., & Yang, J. (2025). Discovering the dark side of AI and algorithmic HRM: Evidence from negative experiences of employees on online delivery platforms. SAGE Open, 15. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251405329

More Articles from JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE AND LEADERSHIP RESEARCH

The Political Economy of Party Defection in Nigeria’s Fourth Republic

Author: Michun Wakili Dickson, Sabo Okonu 3Irene Chinasa Kekeocha-Christopher

Leadership Support Systems and Organizational Growth in Deposit Money Banks: Evidence from Rivers State, Nigeria

Author: Anireh, Uchenna Nicholas, Onwuanaku, Blessing, Happiness Nwanyi Elekwachi

The Challenges of Adopting the Responsibility to Protect in the Russian/Ukraine War

Author: Richard ThankGod Wabali Chimezie Chukwuemeka Eze