Submit your papersSubmit Now
For Enquiries: [email protected]
IIARD LogoIIARD

Global Brand Framing of Gender Equality and Climate Action Sustainability Through Advertising

Naanee, Barivule Vivian., Ohiagu, Pauline Obiageli, Nwachukwu

Abstract

This study examined global brand framing of gender equality and climate action sustainability through advertising. The study adopted a qualitative research design underpinned by framing theory. This study adopted an interpretivist research philosophy. The research design is qualitative and exploratory. The population of the study consists of two interconnected groups: (1) global brand advertising campaigns that explicitly feature gender equality and climate sustainability themes across digital and broadcast platforms, and (2) audience members exposed to such advertising. The advertising population was drawn from an estimated pool of over 1,500 sustainability-themed global brand campaigns circulated internationally between 2022 and 2025 across major platforms such as YouTube, Instagram, television networks, and brand websites, based on industry marketing archives and global advertising monitoring databases (e.g., UNESCO media observatories, international advertising associations, and sustainability brand repositories). A sample size of 20 purposively selected brand campaigns and 30 audience participants was obtained. The campaigns were selected based on clear inclusion criteria: explicit representation of gender equality and climate action narratives, global brand ownership, and international reach. The audience participants were obtained through purposive and snowball sampling, targeting individuals who regularly consume digital and broadcast advertising content and are active media users, ensuring information-rich cases relevant to the study objectives. The sampling technique followed a non-probability, purposive process, beginning with criterion-based selection of campaigns, and subsequent referrals through snowballing to deepen diversity of perspectives. The method of data collection involved qualitative content analysis of selected advertisements, in-depth semi-structured interviews with audience participants, and interpretive narrative analysis of advertising texts and visuals. The method of data analysis was thematic analysis. The findings revealed that audience perceptions of authenticity and credibility were shaped more by visible brand actions, consistency, and transparency than by message aesthetics, with participants trusting advertising messages that aligned with known corporate practices and showing scepticism toward campaigns that relied on E-ISSN 2545-529x vague sustainability claims or symbolic representations. The study justified that while global brands actively integrate gender equality and climate action in advertising, the reliance on symbolic and aspirational framing limits the depth of audience understanding and the potential for meaningful social and environmental impact. The study recommended that global brands and advertising agencies should design campaigns that go beyond symbolic framing, embedding gender equality and climate action into tangible programs and narratives that reflect real-world impact.

Keywords

Global Brand FramingGender EqualityClimate Action SustainabilityAdvertising

References

Adewunmi, O. E., & Aleshinloye, O. S. (2024). Media framing of women’s issues on television and its influence on public perception in Nigeria. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 8(3), 2836– 2867. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2024.803197 CreativeX. (2025). Earth Day advertising insights report. Damle, S., & Krishnan, R. (2025). Framing climate change on YouTube: North–South divides in narratives and public engagement [Preprint]. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2511.14930 Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. Gender Equality Blueprint. (2026). Marketing and advertising section. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Harvard University Press. Ibrahim, A., & Aljarah, A. (2025). Social media marketing drives brand love and customer behavioural engagement: Gender as a moderator. Future Internet, 17(4), 344. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi17040344 Kubinec, R., & Mahajan, A. (2025). Fifty shades of greenwashing: The political economy of climate change advertising on social media. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2511.14930 Palomo-Domínguez, I., Tamošiūnaitė, R., & Segarra-Saavedra, J. (2025). Gender equality as a brand value in the post-digital media scenario. In Proceedings of the World Conference on Gender Equality. DPublication. Rhor, C., Smith, J., Patel, R., & Martinez, L. (2024). Effects of brand awareness and feminist message level in femvertising: An experimental study. Women’s Studies International Forum, 106, 102957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2024.102957 Scheufele, D. A., & Tewksbury, D. (2007). Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 9–20. Silveira, P. D., Shimabukuro Sandes, F., Xara-Brasil, D., & Menezes, K. (2024). Brands’ green activism: Empirical comparison between brand and influencer posts. Sustainability, 16(16), 6863. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16166863 Sinaga, M. P. P., Rahayu, D., Putra, F., & Lestari, S. (2025). Digital greenwashing and gendered eco-branding. Linguistics Initiative. The Guardian. (2024, September 15). ‘Go woke, go broke’ not true for brands, says global advertising study. The Guardian. Unstereotype Alliance. (2025). Background and activities. World Economic Forum. (2019, January 14). Brands can be a force for good and for growth: Here’s how.