References
Allison, E. H., Kurien, J., Ota, Y., et al. (2020). The human relationship with our ocean planet. World Resources Institute. https://oceanpanel.org/blue-papers/ Amadi, E. (1966). The concubine. Heinemann. Aquinas, T., & Bonjoannes, B. (1906). Compendium of the Summa Theologica of St. Aquinas: Pars prima. Thomas Baker. Aristotle. (1943). Aristotle's politics (B. Jowett, Trans.). Modern Library. Armstrong, P. (2008). What animals mean in the fiction of modernity. Routledge. Augustine. (2000). The works of St. Augustine: A translation for the 21st century (J. E. Rotelle & E. Hill, Trans.). New City Press. Beirne, P. (1994). The law is an ass: Reading E. P. Evans' 'The medieval prosecution and capital punishment of animals.' Society & Animals, 2(1), 27–46. Buell, L. (1995). The environmental imagination: Thoreau, nature writing, and the formation of American culture. Harvard University Press. Catholic Church. (1994). Catechism of the Catholic Church. Geoffrey Chapman. Chan, K. M. A., Satterfield, T., & Goldstein, J. (2012). Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values. Ecological Economics, 74, 8–18. Darwin, C. (1859). The origin of species. Penguin. Darwin, C. (1872). The expression of the emotions in man and animals. Appleton and Company. DeMello, M. (Ed.). (2012). Animals and society: An introduction to human-animal studies. Columbia University Press. Descartes, R. (1991). The philosophical writings of Descartes (Vols. 1–3; J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff, & D. Murdoch, Trans.). Cambridge University Press. Donsomsakulkij, W. (2014). When the whale talks back: An interspecies 'cultural' dialogue in Zakes Mda's The Whale Caller. The Asian Conference on Literature & Librarianship: Official Conference Proceedings. University of Bayreuth. Epley, N., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2007). On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review, 114(4), 864–886. Garrard, G. (2004). Ecocriticism. Routledge. Glotfelty, C., & Fromm, H. (Eds.). (1996). The ecocriticism reader: Landmarks in literary ecology. University of Georgia Press. Grewe-Volpp, C. (2016). Making love to whale and bear: Human-animal relationships in Zakes Mda's The Whale Caller and Marian Engel's Bear. Anglistik: International Journal of English Studies, 27(2), 71–83. Guthrie, S. E. (1993). Faces in the clouds: A new theory of religion. Oxford University Press. Heidegger, M. (1971). A dialogue on language (between a Japanese and an inquirer) (P. D. Hertz, Trans.). In On the way to language. Harper & Row. Huggan, G., & Tiffin, H. (2010). Postcolonial ecocriticism: Literature, animals, environment. Routledge. Hume, D. (1956). The natural history of religion (H. E. Root, Ed.). Stanford University Press. Iheka, C. (2018). Naturalizing Africa: Ecological violence, agency, and postcolonial resistance in African literature. Cambridge University Press. Kant, I. (1998). The groundwork for the metaphysics of morals (M. J. Gregor, Trans.). Cambridge University Press. Korthals, M. (2016). Human-animal interfaces from a pragmatist perspective. In B. Bovenkerk & J. Keulartz (Eds.), Animal ethics in the age of humans: Blurring boundaries in human- animal relations (Vol. 23, pp. 73–87). Springer. McHugh, S. (2011). Animal stories: Narrating across species lines. University of Minnesota Press. Mda, Z. (2000). The heart of redness. Oxford University Press. Mda, Z. (2006). The whale caller. Farrar, Straus and Giroux. Nixon, R. (2011). Slow violence and the environmentalism of the poor. Harvard University Press. Obioma, C. (2015). The fishermen. Little, Brown. Ojedoja, S., & Abubakar, A. S. (2018). Foreign exploitation of tourism in Zakes Mda's The Heart of Redness and The Whale Caller. International Journal of Language, Literature and Gender Studies, 7(2), 85–93. Preece, R., & Fraser, D. (2000). The status of animals in biblical and Christian thought: A study in colliding values. Society & Animals, 8(3), 245–263. Russell, R., Guerry, A. D., Balvanera, P., et al. (2013). Humans and nature: How knowing and experiencing nature affect well-being. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 38, 473–502. Senent, M.-J. (2014). The human-animal relationship: A new field of socio-educational action. New Approaches in Educational Research, 3(2), 100–106. Srivastava, A. (2025). Living waters, thinking forests: A study of non-human intelligence in posthuman climate narratives. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 7(6). https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i06.61287 Tam, K.-P. (2019). Anthropomorphism of nature, environmental guilt, and pro-environmental behavior. Sustainability, 11(19), Article 5430. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195430 Weil, K. (2012). Thinking animals: Why animal studies now? Columbia University Press. Wolfe, C. (2003). Animal rites: American culture, the discourse of species, and posthumanist theory. University of Chicago Press. Wolfe, C. (Ed.). (2003). Zoontologies: The question of the animal. University of Minnesota Press. The Holy Bible, New King James Version. (1982). Thomas Nelson. Yue, D., Zhang, W., Ma, Y., et al. (2021). Anthropomorphic strategies promote wildlife conservation through empathy: The moderation role of the public epidemic situation. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(1), Article 35.
