References
AM. BAR ASS’N, (2020). ONLINE DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN THE UNITED STATES. Accessed from https://www.americanbar.org/content/report.pdf Annang, A. and Enoch, A.O. (2023) Exploring Conflict and Its Dialectic Nature in a Ghanaian Society. Open Access Library Journal, 10: e10317. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1110317 Barendrecht, M. (2009). In Search of Micro justice: Five Basic Elements of a Dispute System. TISCO Working Paper Series on Civil Law and Conflict Resolution Systems No. 002/2009 December 2008, Version: 1.0 & Tilburg University Legal Studies Working Paper No. 002/2009 Barendrecht, M., P. Kamminga, et al. (2008). Priorities for the Justice System: Responding to the Most Urgent Legal Problems of Individuals, SSRN. Barton, B. H. et al., (2015). Middle Income Access to Justice, 65 U. TORONTO L.J. 434. (Book Review). Blankley, K. M. (2020). Online Resources and Family Cases: Access to Justice in Implementation of a Plan, 88 FORDHAM L. REV. 2121, 2121–22. Brito, T. L. (2019). The Right to Civil Counsel, 148 DÆDALUS, at 56, 57. 59. CAMACHO, A. E. & GLICKSMAN, R. L. (2019). Reorganizing government: A functional and dimensional framework, 21. Commission on Legal Empowerment of the Poor (2008). Making the Law Work for Everyone. II Working Group Reports. Edelman, L. B. & Suchman, M. C. (1999). When the “Haves” Hold Court: Speculations on the Organizational Internalization of Law, 33 LAW & SOC’Y REV. 941, 943, 953. Engler, R. (2010). Connecting Self-Representation to Civil Gideon: What Existing Data Reveal About When Counsel Is Most Needed, 37 FORDHAM URB. L.J. 37, 39–40. Field, R. M. (2006). Using the Feminist Critique of Mediation to Explore “the Good, the Bad and the Ugly” Implications for Women of the Introduction of Mandatory Family Dispute Resolution in Australia, 20 AUSTL. J. FAM. L. 45, 45–78. Genn, H. (2005). Solving Civil Justice Problems: What Might Be Best? Scotish Consumer Council Seminar on Civil Justice: 27. Genn, H. (2012). What is civil justice for? Reform, ADR, and access to justice. Accessed from https://openyls.law.yale.edu/entities/publication/ Goldberg, S. (2013). Defending philosophy in the face of systematic disagreement. In D. Machuca (Ed.), Disagreement and skepticism (pp. 277-294). Routledge. Herd, P. & Moynihan, D. P. (2018). Administrative Burden: Policymaking by other Means 22. Kelly, T. (2005). The epistemic significance of disagreement. Oxford Studies in Epistemology, 1, 167-196. Legal Servs. Corp., (2017). The justice gap: measuring the unmet civil legal needs of low-income Americans 6, https://www.lsc.gov/sites/default/files/images/TheJusticeGap- FullReport.pdf [https://perma.cc/3P56-QYKK] Lichtenstein, M. (2000). Mediation and Feminism: Common Values and Challenges, 18 MEDIATION Q. 19, 20–21. Liu, J. (2016). Asian Paradigm Theory and Access to Justice, 32 J. CONTEMP. CRIM. JUST. 205, 211–17 E-ISSN 2579-051X Nat’l Ctr. for State CTS., (2015). The Landscape of Civil Litigation in State Courts, https://www.ncsc.org/__data/assets/pdf_file/0020/13376/civiljusticereport-2015.pdf [https://perma.cc/YU6G-6JA7] Paul, S. O., Yunusaigono, P., & Apeh, G. I. (2021). Language Determination in Politics. World Affairs: The Journal of International Issues, 25(2), 138-158. Salem, P. (2009). The Emergence of Triage in Family Court Services: The Beginning of the End for Mandatory Mediation? 47 FAM. CT. REV. 371, 371–72. Sandefur, R. (nd). Fulcrum Point, supra note 71, at 957–62. Sander, F. E. A. (1985). Alternative Methods of Dispute Resolution: An Overview. Harvard Law School Sander, Frank E. A. (1985). Alternative Methods of Dispute Resolution: An Overview, Florida Law Review, 37(1), 1. Available at: https://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/flr/vol37/iss1/1 Singer, L. (2018). Settling disputes: Conflict resolution in business, families, and the legal system. Routledge. Singh, S. (2020). Access to Justice and Dispute Resolution Across Cultures, 88 Fordham L. Rev. 2407. Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol88/iss6/12 Taylor Poppe, E. S. (2020). Institutional design for access to justice. UC Irvine L. Rev., 11, 781. Tonya L. Brito, David J. Pate Jr., Gordon, D. & Ward, A. (2016). What We Know and Need to Know About Civil Gideon, 67 S.C. L. REV. 223, 225. U.S. CONST. art. III, § 2 (limiting the jurisdiction of the federal courts to particular cases and controversies). Yates, S. & Salem, P. (2013). Family Court ADR: Decades of Cultivating Innovation, DISP. RESOL. MAG., Fall, at 4: 4 Zemans, F. K. (1983). Legal Mobilization: The Neglected Role of the Law in the Political System, 77 AM. POL. SCI. REV. 690, 691. Zuckerman, A. A. S., S. Chiarloni, et al. (1999). Civil justice in crisis: comparative perspectives of civil procedure, Oxford University Press.
