Submit your papersSubmit Now
For Enquiries: [email protected]
IIARD LogoIIARD

From Symbolic Resistance to Coercive Mobilization: Biafra Agitation Under the Jonathan and Buhari Administrations in Nigeria

Alu, Clement Audu, Ph.D

Abstract

This study examines the evolution of Biafra secessionist agitation in Nigeria during the administrations of Goodluck Jonathan (2010–2015) and Muhammadu Buhari (2015–2023). Drawing on qualitative data from Key Informant Interviews and documentary analysis, it investigates how governance deficits, perceived political exclusion, and state responses influenced the movement's trajectory. Findings reveal that agitation under Jonathan was largely symbolic, decentralised, and low-intensity, reflecting a phase of latent mobilisation. In contrast, the Buhari administration witnessed an escalation characterised by coercive mobilisation, digital activism, and the emergence of armed structures. Anchored in the Remedial Rights Only Theory, the study argues that this transformation was path-dependent: earlier symbolic resistance created the foundations for later escalation, while securitised state responses narrowed the space for non- violent engagement. It recommends a shift toward inclusive governance, political dialogue, and institutional reforms.

Keywords

Biafra agitationsecessionsymbolic resistancecoercive mobilisationpolitical exclusiongovernance deficits

References

Buchanan, A. (1991). Secession: The morality of political divorce from Fort Sumter to Lithuania and Quebec. Westview Press. Buchanan, A. (2004). Justice, legitimacy, and self-determination: Moral foundations for international law. Oxford University Press. Castells, M. (2015). Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the Internet age (2nd ed.). Polity Press. Duruji, M. M. (2012). Resurgent Biafra agitation: Protesting injustice in Nigeria? African Security Review, 21(4), 94–108. Ezeibe, C. (2017). Digital activism and Biafra agitation. Journal of African Studies, 12(3), 55–70. Ibeanu, O. (2008). Affluence and affliction: The Niger Delta as a critique of political science in Nigeria. University of Nigeria Press. Nwangwu, C. (2022). Mobilisation strategies of IPOB. African Affairs, 121(482), 1–23. Nwankpa, M. (2017). The politics of IPOB. Review of African Political Economy, 44(153), 123– 139. Ojo, E. O. (2023). Economic impact of sit-at-home orders. Journal of Contemporary African Studies, 41(2), 210–225. Ojo, E. O. (2024). Secessionist movements in Nigeria. African Political Review, 10(1), 45–63. Okolie, A. (2015). Pro-Biafra agitation and Nigerian politics. Journal of Political Studies, 8(2), 77–92. Onuoha, F. C. (2021). IPOB and security challenges. African Security, 14(3), 200–220. Osaghae, E. E. (1998). Crippled giant: Nigeria since independence. Indiana University Press. Suberu, R. T. (2001). Federalism and ethnic conflict in Nigeria. United States Institute of Peace Press.

More Articles from JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE AND LEADERSHIP RESEARCH

The Political Economy of Party Defection in Nigeria’s Fourth Republic

Author: Michun Wakili Dickson, Sabo Okonu 3Irene Chinasa Kekeocha-Christopher

Leadership Support Systems and Organizational Growth in Deposit Money Banks: Evidence from Rivers State, Nigeria

Author: Anireh, Uchenna Nicholas, Onwuanaku, Blessing, Happiness Nwanyi Elekwachi

The Challenges of Adopting the Responsibility to Protect in the Russian/Ukraine War

Author: Richard ThankGod Wabali Chimezie Chukwuemeka Eze