Submit your papersSubmit Now
For Enquiries: [email protected]
IIARD LogoIIARD

Flooding and Climate Change Adaptation in Informal Settlements in Nigeria

Taol Dinebari1 Lawson Tamunoiminabo, 1, 2

Abstract

Informal settlements in Nigeria, particularly within burgeoning coastal hubs like Lagos and Port Harcourt, currently represent the critical frontline of global climate vulnerability. This research provides a comprehensive investigation into the complex nexus between escalating flood risks and climate change adaptation strategies within these precarious urban environments. As rapid, unplanned urbanisation intersects with intensified pluvial and fluvial flooding, the study examines how the absence of formal urban integration exacerbates the fragility of human habitats. The research employs a robust mixed-methods approach to bridge the gap between technical modeling and lived experience. On the quantitative front, it integrates Geographic Information Systems spatial analysis with Multi-Criteria Evaluation and Hydrologic Engineering Centres River Analysis System (HEC-RAS) modeling. This technical suite allows for the precise quantification of spatial risk and hydraulic behaviour across selected settlements. Complementing this, the study utilizes extensive household surveys to evaluate the efficacy of community-led adaptation strategies in the face of persistent institutional neglect and infrastructure deficits. Key findings reveal that while climate change serves as the primary catalyst for environmental shifts, the severity of flood impacts is disproportionately amplified by systematic governance failures. These include chronic underinvestment in drainage infrastructure, the absence of formal land tenure, and a lack of regulatory oversight. The analysis identifies a diverse spectrum of autonomous adaptation mechanisms—indigenous solutions born of necessity. These range from physical structural modifications, such as makeshift embankments and elevated floor heights, to social-capital-based resilience, including community-organised early warning systems. However, the study notes that these local innovations are frequently reactive, under-resourced, and insufficient in the face of high-magnitude events. Consequently, the research concludes that achieving sustainable flood resilience necessitates a fundamental paradigm shift. It advocates for moving away from traditional, top-down technocratic engineering solutions in favour of a "Co- Production Model." This proposed framework champions the integration of indigenous knowledge with formal urban planning and inclusive climate policies. By addressing the deep-seated socio- IIARD International Journal of Geography & Environmental Management economic drivers of vulnerability, this study provides a scalable framework for policy interventions that align climate adaptation with urban social justice. Ultimately, it emphasizes that true resilience in the Global South is unattainable without first addressing the underlying structural inequalities of Nigeria’s urban landscape.

Keywords

Climate ChangeAdaptationInformal SettlementsFlood ResilienceSocial Vulnerability.

References

Adelekan, I. O. (2010). Vulnerability of poor urban coastal communities to flooding in Lagos, Nigeria. Environment and Urbanization, 22(2), 433–450. Adger, W. N., Arnell, N. W., & Tompkins, E. L. (2005). Adaptation to climate change in the developing world. Progress in Development Studies, 5(3), 179–195. Agbola, T., & Agunbiade, E. M. (2009). Urbanization, Slum Development and Security of Tenure: The Challenges of Meeting Millennium Development Goals in Nigeria. Ajibade, I., McBean, G., & Bezner-Kerr, R. (2013). Urban flooding in Lagos, Nigeria: Patterns of vulnerability and resilience among women. Global Environmental Change, 23(6), 1714– 1725. Brunner, G. W. (2016). HEC-RAS, River Analysis System: User's Manual. US Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Engineering Center. Bryman, A. (2016). Social Research Methods. Oxford University Press. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Sage Publications. Hallegatte, S., Green, C., Nicholls, R. J., & Corfee-Morlot, J. (2013). Future flood losses in major coastal cities. Nature Climate Change, 3(9), 802–806. IPCC (2023). Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Mitlin, D. (2008). With and beyond the state—co-production as a route to political influence, power and transformed residential outcomes. Environment and Urbanization, 20(2), 339– 360. Nkeki, P. N., et al. (2022). Geospatial analysis of flood vulnerability in Nigeria’s coastal cities. Journal of African Earth Sciences. Nkwunonwo, U. C., Whitworth, M., & Baily, B. (2016). A review of flood risk management in Nigeria. Natural Hazards, 83, 1541–1565. Ostrom, E. (1996). Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergies, and development. World Development, 24(6), 1073–1087. Pelling, M. (2003). The Vulnerability of Cities: Social Resilience and Natural Disaster. Earthscan Publications. Satterthwaite, D., Archer, D., Almansi, F., et al. (2020). Building Resilience to Climate Change in Informal Settlements. One Earth, 2(2), 143–156. Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2010). Sage Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research. Sage Publications. Watson, V. (2009). ‘The plan ned city sweeps the poor away...’: Urban planning and 21st century urbanisation. Progress in Planning, 72(3), 151–193. Wisner, B., Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., & Davis, I. (2004). At Risk: Natural Hazards, People's Vulnerability and Disasters. Routledge.

More Articles from IIARD INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT