Submit your papersSubmit Now
For Enquiries: [email protected]
IIARD LogoIIARD

A Comparative Analysis of Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and Technology Adoption Among Criminology and Engineering Students in Nigerian Polytechnics

Akinleke, Wasiu Olaitan PhD, Osore, John Olumide

Abstract

This study examined the perceived usefulness of educational technology among undergraduate students in Criminology and Engineering, using an integrated framework combining the Technology Acceptance Model , Social Learning Theory , and Routine Activity Theory . A cross-sectional survey design was employed to collect data from 341 undergraduates at two Nigerian polytechnics in Southwest Nigeria. Descriptive and inferential analyses, including independent t-tests, regression, and structural equation modelling, were conducted to explore disciplinary differences in technology perceptions and the influence of social and structural factors on adoption intentions. Results indicated that engineering students perceived technology as more useful and relevant than criminology students. Factors, such as peer and faculty modelling, routine activities, and access to technological resources, significantly predicted perceived usefulness across both disciplines. Further, the structural equation modelling confirmed that perceived usefulness strongly influenced behavioural intention to adopt technology, thereby supporting TAM and highlighting the complementary roles of SLT and RAT. By implication, instructional contexts and needs, exposure to technology, and perceived ease of use jointly shape students’ opinions and intentions to adopt technology. This emphasises the need for purposive interventions in social science curricula to enhance the adoption of technology. This study contributes to knowledge by demonstrating the value of integrating cognitive and curricular variables in understanding educational technology acceptance.

Keywords

TechnologyPerceptionEngineeringCriminologyand Students.

References

Akers, R. L. (2017). Social learning and social structure: A general theory of bcrime and deviance (2nd ed.). Routledge. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice Hall. Becher, T., & Trowler, P. R. (2001). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines (2nd ed.). Open University Press. Cohen, L., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 588–608. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094589 Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008 Falebita, O. S., & Kok, P. J. (2025). Artificial intelligence tools usage: A structural equation modelling of undergraduates’ technological readiness, self-efficacy and attitudes. Journal for STEM Education Research, 8, 257–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979- 024-00132-1 Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308 Lin, Y., & Yu, Z. (2023). Extending TAM to higher-education students’ use of digital academic reading tools. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00403-8 Liu, H., Chen, X., & Wang, J. (2025). The influence of social and structural factors on students’ acceptance of digital learning tools: A cross-disciplinary study. Computers & Education, 199, 104848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104848 Liu, X., Wang, J., & Luo, Y. (2025). Acceptance and use of technology on digital learning resource utilization and digital literacy among Chinese engineering students: A longitudinal study based on the UTAUT2 model. Behavioural Sciences, 15(6), 728. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15060728 Mtebe, J. S., & Raisamo, R. (2018). Investigating students’ behavioural intention to adopt and use mobile learning in higher education in East Africa. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15, 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239- 018-0087-5 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2021). Education at a glance 2021: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/b35a14e5-en United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2023). Global education monitoring report 2023: Technology in education—A tool on whose terms? UNESCO Publishing. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2015). Comprehensive study on cybercrime and digital forensics in education. UNODC. https://www.unodc.org Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926 Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540 Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information IJEMT technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412