Submit your papersSubmit Now
For Enquiries: [email protected]
IIARD LogoIIARD

Blended Learning and Instructional Design: Effects on Students’ Engagement and Academic Performance

Kechinyere Chinda

Abstract

This study examined the effects of blended learning and instructional design on students’ engagement and academic performance among second-year undergraduate students undergoing teaching practice at the University of Port Harcourt and Ignatius Ajuru University of Education. A correlational survey research design with an experimental component was adopted. From a population of 800 students, a sample of 200 was selected using stratified random sampling to ensure proportional representation across institutions and disciplines. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire measuring students’ engagement and perceptions of instructional design, alongside academic performance records obtained from pre-test and post-test scores. The instruments were validated by experts and demonstrated good reliability with a Cronbach’s Alpha coefficient of 0.87. A six-week blended learning intervention, integrating online modules, multimedia resources, and face-to-face instruction, was implemented. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and inferential techniques, including Pearson correlation, paired sample t- test, and regression analysis at a 0.05 level of significance. Findings revealed a significant positive relationship between instructional design and students’ engagement (r = 0.61, p < 0.05), as well as between engagement and academic performance (r = 0.55, p < 0.05). The paired sample t-test showed a significant improvement in students’ academic performance following the blended learning intervention (t = 14.25, p < 0.05). Additionally, regression analysis indicated that challenges in implementing blended learning significantly affected students’ academic outcomes. The study concluded that effective instructional design enhances student engagement, which in turn improves academic performance in blended learning environments. It recommends that educators prioritize well-structured instructional design and address implementation challenges to maximize the benefits of blended learning.

Keywords

Blended learningInstructional designStudent engagementAcademic performanceteaching practiceHigher education

References

Ashraf, M. A., Yang, M., Zhang, Y., Denden, M., Tlili, A., Liu, J., Huang, R., & Burgos, D. (2021). A systematic review of systematic reviews on blended learning: Trends, gaps, and future directions. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 14, 1525– 1541. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S331741 Buhl-Wiggers, J., Kjærgaard, A., & Munk, K. (2023). A scoping review of experimental evidence on face-to-face components of blended learning in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 48(1), 151–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2022.2123911 Cao, W. (2023). A meta-analysis of effects of blended learning on performance, attitude, achievement, and engagement across different countries. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1212056. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1212056 Chanda, C. T. (2024). The impact of remote learning on educational outcomes: A case of selected higher learning institutions in Lusaka District, Zambia. International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews, 5(7), 587–596. Chen, L., & Watkins, D. (2023). Methodological challenges in blended learning research: A critical review. Educational Research Review, 38, 515–533. Chen, S., Yang, J., & Hsiao, C. (2018). The effects of flipped classroom on student learning achievement and motivation in secondary mathematics education. Educational Technology & Society, 21(3), 119–132. Chiu, T. K. (2021). Digital support for student engagement in blended learning based on self- determination theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 124, 106909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106909 Dakhi, O., Irfan, D., Jama, J., Ambiyar, A., Simatupang, W., Sukardi, S., & Zagoto, M. M. (2022). Blended learning and its implications for learning outcomes: Computer and basic networks for vocational high school students in the era of COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S4), 11177– 11186. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS4.10976 Davis, K., & Smith, B. (2022). Communities of inquiry across modalities: Examining social, cognitive, and teaching presence in blended secondary classrooms. International Journal of Educational Technology, 17(2), 302–318. Deepa, J., Zalte, S., Sridhar, J. K. R., & Mahajan, D. (2023). The impact of blended learning on student engagement in the digital era. European Chemical Bulletin, 12(SI12), 727– 735. https://doi.org/10.48047/ecb/2023.12.si12.063 Dziuban, C., Graham, C. R., Moskal, P. D., Norberg, A., & Sicilia, N. (2018). Blended learning: The new normal and emerging technologies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1), 1–16. Ferdig, R. E., Baumgartner, E., Hartshorne, R., Kaplan-Rakowski, R., & Mouza, C. (2021). Teaching, technology, and teacher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: Stories from the field. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education. Garcia, A., Abrego, J., & Calvillo, M. (2020). A study of the hybrid instructional delivery for graduate students in an educational leadership course. International Journal of E- Learning & Distance Education, 35(1), 171–194. Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review, 27(1), 1–12. Hong, Q. N., Pluye, P., Fàbregues, S., Bartlett, G., Boardman, F., Cargo, M., ... Vedel, I. (2018). Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool , version 2018. Canadian Intellectual Property Office. Johnson, H., & Ramirez, A. (2021). Designing for equity: Creating blended learning models that work for diverse learners. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 24(1), 186– 203.\ Johnson, K., Martinez, P., & Chen, Y. (2022). Student engagement dimensions in blended secondary classrooms: A mixed methods investigation. Journal of Digital Learning Research, 4(2), 428–445. Li, J., & Xue, E. (2023). Dynamic interaction between student learning behaviour and learning environment: Meta-analysis of student engagement and its influencing factors. Behavioral Sciences, 13(1), 59. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13010059 Martinez, S., & Collins, K. (2021). Addressing digital divides in urban blended learning settings: A case study approach. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(1), 143– 162. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. Ramirez, J., & Khan, S. (2023). Teacher technology experience as a predictor of implementation quality: A longitudinal study of blended learning in urban secondary schools. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(2), 329–348. Rasheed, R. A., Kamsin, A., & Abdullah, N. A. (2020). Challenges in the online component of blended learning: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 144, 103701. Tonbuloğlu, B., & Tonbuloğlu, İ. (2023). Trends and patterns in blended learning research (1965–2022). Education and Information Technologies, 28, 13987– 14018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11754-0 Werang, B. R., & Radja Leba, S. (2022). Factors affecting student engagement in online teaching and learning: A qualitative case study. The Qualitative Report, 27(2), 555– 577. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5165 Wester, E. R., Walsh, L. L., Arango-Caro, S., & Callis-Duehl, K. L. (2021). Student engagement declines in STEM undergraduates during COVID-19–driven remote learning. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 22(1), 22.1.50. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v22i1.2385 Zhang, Y., & Wilson, K. (2020). Designing blended mathematics learning environments in secondary education: A mixed-methods analysis of instructional design quality. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 32(3), 401–423. Zhu, Z., & Hu, J. (2021). Technology empowers educational innovation in the later stage of the epidemic: A new form of online and offline integrated teaching. Open Education Research, (1), 13–23.

More Articles from WORLD JOURNAL OF INNOVATION AND MODERN TECHNOLOGY