References
VALUE WBC (×109/L) 1.27b 1.71b 2.19a 2.02ab 0.13 8-30 RBC (×106/μL) 1.29 2.27 2.56 2.09 0.19 2.0-3.5 HB (G/DL) 1.36 1.26 1.46 1.62 0.97 8-13 HCT (%) 4.36 3.78 4.36 3.65 0.14 30-40 MCV (FL) 1.64 1.67 1.71 1.76 0.02 90-125 MCH (PG) 5.24b 5.59ab 5.84a 5.69a 0.77 30-45 MCHC (G/DL) 3.19 3.33 3.34 3.33 0.03 28-35 ***Means on the same row with different superscripts are significantly different (P < 0.05) Key: WBC = White Blood Cells, RBC = Red Blood Cells, Hb = Hemoglobin, HCT = Hematocrit, MCV = Mean Corpuscular Volume, MCH = Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin, MCHC = Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin Concentration 1.1 White Blood Cell Count The white blood cell count exhibited substantial change (P < 0.05) among treatments. The peak WBC count was seen in D3 (50% SPPM) at 2.19 × 109/L, succeeded by D4 (75% SPPM) at 2.02 × 109/L, D2 (25% SPPM) at 1.71 × 109/L, and D1 (control) at 1.27 × 109/L. D3 exhibited a statistically significant elevation compared to D1 and D2, although showed no significant difference from D4. D1 had the lowest WBC count, which was substantially lower than that of D3, however not statistically different from D2 and D4. All WBC counts fell within the usual reference range for healthy chickens (8-30 × 109/L). 1.2 Erythrocyte Count The red blood cell count varied from 1.29 × 106/μL on Day 1 to 2.56 × 106/μL on Day 3. Despite numerical discrepancies, the change lacked statistical significance (P > 0.05). All RBC readings fell within the usual reference range of 2.0-3.5 × 106/μL, except for D1, which was marginally below the standard range. 1.3 Hemoglobin Concentration Hemoglobin concentration varied from 1.26 g/dL in D2 to 1.62 g/dL in D4. No substantial differences (P > 0.05) were seen across the treatments. All hemoglobin readings were below the usual reference range of 8-13 g/dL. 1.4 Hematocrit Packed cell volume varied from 3.65% in D4 to 4.36% in D1 and D3. No notable changes (P > 0.05) were seen across the treatments. All HCT readings fell outside the standard reference range of 30-40%. 1.5 Average Corpuscular Volume Mean corpuscular volume varied from 1.64 fL in D1 to 1.76 fL in D4. No substantial differences (P > 0.05) were seen across the treatments. All MCV readings fell outside the standard reference range of 90-125 fL. 1.6 Average Corpuscular Hemoglobin Mean corpuscular hemoglobin exhibited considerable variance (P < 0.05) among treatments. The maximum MCH was seen in D3 (50% SPPM) at 5.84 pg, succeeded by D4 (5.69 pg), D2 (5.59 pg), and D1 (5.24 pg). D3, D4, and D2 exhibited no significant differences among themselves; however, D1 was much lower than both D3 and D4. All MCH levels were outside the standard reference range of 30-45 pg. 1.7 Average Corpuscular Hemoglobin Concentration The mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration varied from 3.19 g/dL on Day 1 to 3.34 g/dL on Day 3. No substantial differences (P > 0.05) were seen across the treatments. All MCHC readings fell outside the usual reference range of 28-35 g/dL. 2 Serum Biochemical Metrics Table 3 presents the serum biochemical characteristics of Noiler chicks that were fed diets with varying quantities of processed sweet potato peel meal as a substitute for maize. Marked alterations (P < 0.05) were noted in albumin, aspartate transaminase, and alanine transaminase, but total protein, globulin, alkaline phosphatase, urea, creatinine, and cholesterol exhibited no significant changes (P > 0.05). Table 3: Serum Biochemical Parameters of Noiler Chickens Fed Graded Levels of Processed Sweet Potato Peel Meal PARAMETER D1 (0%) D2 (25%) D3 (50%) D4 (75%) SEM REFERENCE VALUE TOTAL PROTEIN (G/DL) 34.33 34.00 35.66 32.66 0.78 3.0-4.9 ALBUMIN (G/DL) 17.00b 17.33ab 20.67a 15.33b 0.73 2.80-4.00 GLOBULIN (G/DL) 17.33 16.00 17.00 17.00 0.64 1.94-3.04 AST (μ/L) 39.00b 44.33ab 49.66a 34.00c 1.84 70-220 ALT (μ/L) 6.00c 10.33a 9.67ab 7.00b 0.57 7-65 ALP (μ/L) 122.00 122.33 121.33 121.33 0.89 121-122 UREA (MG/DL) 5.56 3.20 4.60 4.00 0.41 3.3-7.2 CREATININE (μ/L) 61.00 60.00 67.63 69.33 3.72 0.70-1.30 CHOLESTEROL (MG/DL) 3.44 4.23 3.45 3.53 0.25 2.5-5.5 ***Means on the same row with different superscripts are significantly different (P < 0.05) Key: AST = Aspartate Transaminase, ALT = Alanine Transaminase, ALP = Alkaline Phosphatase 2.1 Total Protein The total protein content varied from 32.66 g/dL in D4 to 35.66 g/dL in D3. No substantial differences (P > 0.05) were seen across the treatments. All total protein readings above the normal reference range of 3.0-4.9 g/dL. 2.2 Albumin The concentration of albumin exhibited considerable change (P < 0.05) among treatments. The peak albumin concentration was seen in D3 (50% SPPM) at 20.67 g/dL, succeeded by D2 (17.33 g/dL), D1 (17.00 g/dL), and D4 (15.33 g/dL). D3 was markedly elevated compared to D1 and D4, however not statistically distinct from D2. D4 had the lowest albumin content, substantially lower than D2 and D3, however not statistically different from D1. All albumin levels above the usual reference range of 2.80-4.00 g/dL. 2.3 Globulin The content of globulin varied from 16.00 g/dL in D2 to 17.33 g/dL in D1. No notable changes (P > 0.05) were seen across the treatments. All globulin levels exceeded the usual reference range of 1.94-3.04 g/dL. 2.4 Aspartate Transaminase Aspartate transaminase activity exhibited substantial variance (P < 0.05) among treatments. The peak AST activity was seen in D3 (50% SPPM) at 49.66 μ/L, succeeded by D2 (44.33 μ/L), D1 (39.00 μ/L), and D4 (34.00 μ/L). D3 was markedly elevated compared to D1 and D4, however not statistically distinct from D2. D4 had the lowest AST activity, much lower than D1, D2, and D3. All AST levels fell outside the typical reference range of 70-220 μ/L. 2.5 Alanine Aminotransferase Alanine transaminase activity exhibited substantial variance (P < 0.05) among treatments. The peak ALT activity was seen in D2 (25% SPPM) at 10.33 μ/L, succeeded by D3 (9.67 μ/L), D4 (7.00 μ/L), and D1 (6.00 μ/L). D2 was markedly elevated compared to D1 and D4, however not statistically distinct from D3. D1 had the lowest ALT activity, substantially lower than D2 and D3, however not statistically different from D4. All ALT levels fell within the usual reference range of 7-65 μ/L. 2.6 Alkaline Phosphatase Alkaline phosphatase activity varied from 121.33 μ/L in D3 and D4 to 122.33 μ/L in D2. No substantial differences (P > 0.05) were seen across the treatments. All ALP readings fell within the usual reference range of 121-122 μ/L. 2.7 Urea The urea content varied from 3.20 mg/dL in D2 to 5.56 mg/dL in D1. No notable changes (P > 0.05) were seen across the treatments. All urea levels fell within the normal reference range of 3.3- 7.2 mg/dL. 2.8 Creatinine The creatinine content varied from 60.00 μ/L on Day 2 to 69.33 μ/L on Day 4. No substantial differences (P > 0.05) were seen across the treatments. All creatinine levels above the usual reference range of 0.70-1.30 μ/L. 2.9 Cholesterol Cholesterol levels varied from 3.44 mg/dL in D1 to 4.23 mg/dL in D2. No notable changes (P > 0.05) were seen across the treatments. All cholesterol levels fell within the standard reference range of 2.5-5.5 mg/dL. Discussion 1. Hematological Metrics The hematological parameters assessed in this study offer significant insights into the health condition and physiological responses of Noiler chickens using diets with processed sweet potato peel meal. The lack of substantial changes in the majority of hematological parameters among treatments suggests that incorporating SPPM up to 75% did not negatively impact the hematopoietic system or the general health of the birds. 1.1 Erythrocyte Parameters The absence of notable variations in RBC count, Hb concentration, HCT, MCV, and MCHC among treatments indicates that SPPM inclusion did not precipitate anemia or impair oxygen-carrying ability. It is important to highlight that the absolute values for these parameters were typically below the accepted reference ranges for healthy chickens (Bounous & Stedman, 2000). This discovery may be ascribed to the birds' age (eight weeks), since juvenile birds generally exhibit lower hematological values than adult birds (Mitruka & Rawnsley, 1977). Moreover, breed- specific variances in Noiler birds may diverge from the standard values set for commercial broiler breeds. The numerical rise in RBC count with SPPM inclusion, although not statistically significant, implies that the minerals found in fermented SPPM, especially iron and copper, may have facilitated erythropoiesis. As noted in Topic 1, fermented SPPM possesses significant mineral content (calcium 17.49 mg/100g, sodium 3.05 mg/100g) essential for erythropoiesis (Kaneko et al., 2008). The markedly elevated MCH readings in birds consuming 50% and 75% SPPM suggest an increase in hemoglobin content per red blood cell at these higher inclusion levels. This discovery aligns with the enhanced mineral bioavailability from fermented SPPM and indicates that the incorporation of SPPM may augment the oxygen-carrying capability of individual red blood cells (Jain, 1993). 1.2 Leukocyte Parameters The substantial elevation in WBC count at 50% SPPM inclusion (2.19 × 109/L) relative to the control (1.27 × 109/L) is remarkable. The white blood cell count serves as a measure of immunological health and may elevate due to illness, inflammation, or stress (Campbell, 2004). Nonetheless, all WBC counts remained within the normal reference range (8-30 x 109/L), suggesting that the elevation was not symptomatic of pathogenic conditions. The elevated WBC count at moderate inclusion levels may indicate improved immunological competence, potentially attributable to bioactive chemicals in fermented SPPM that increase immune function (Gbogbo et al., 2012). Alternatively, it may signify a subtle physiological response to the nutritional alteration. The lack of leukocytosis or leukopenia in all treatments indicates that SPPM incorporation did not provoke substantial immunological challenges or immunosuppression (Lumeij, 1997). 2. Serum Biochemical Metrics The serum biochemical markers indicate protein metabolism, hepatic function, renal function, and lipid metabolism. The notable variations in albumin, AST, and ALT, with the majority of other data remaining unchanged, suggest that SPPM incorporation exerted targeted influences on protein metabolism and hepatic enzyme activity. 2.1 Protein Metabolism The increased total protein, albumin, and globulin levels in all treatments relative to reference ranges are significant. The elevated levels may be ascribed to the high-protein diet formulation (20.00-21.21% crude protein), which surpassed the protein needs for maintenance and development, leading to increased circulatory protein levels (NRC, 1994). The enhanced protein digestibility seen in birds using SPPM (Topic 3) may have facilitated increased protein absorption and elevated blood protein levels. The markedly elevated albumin concentration with 50% SPPM inclusion (20.67 g/dL) vs to other treatments is notably intriguing. Albumin is produced in the liver and has a role in regulating osmotic pressure and transporting diverse chemicals (Kaneko et al., 2008). The increased albumin levels may indicate heightened protein synthesis or decreased protein catabolism at this inclusion level. This data aligns with the enhanced growth performance noted at 25% SPPM inclusion in Topic 2 and indicates that moderate SPPM inclusion facilitates effective protein use. The globulin levels, indicative of immunoglobulins and other protective proteins, were enhanced in all treatments. This spike may signify improved immunological capability or may represent a general increase in serum protein levels (Lumeij, 1997). 2.2 Hepatic Enzymes The activities of AST and ALT serve as crucial indications of hepatocellular integrity and functionality (Campbell, 2004). AST is present in the liver, heart, skeletal muscle, and several other tissues, whereas ALT is predominantly restricted to the liver. Increased activity of these enzymes usually signifies hepatocellular injury or heightened membrane permeability (Kaneko et al., 2008). The AST activity recorded in this study (34.00-49.66 μ/L) fell below the usual reference range (70-220 μ/L), suggesting that SPPM inclusion did not induce hepatocellular damage. The considerable fluctuation in AST among treatments, peaking at 50% inclusion, may indicate normal physiological variation rather than a pathogenic alteration, as all levels stayed within acceptable parameters. The little AST activity at 75% inclusion (34.00 μ/L) indicates that elevated SPPM inclusion did not negatively impact liver function. ALT activity (6.00-10.33 μ/L) fell within the normal reference range (7-65 μ/L), except for the control group (6.00 μ/L), which was marginally below the reference range. The notable elevation in ALT at 25% and 50% inclusion relative to the control indicates that SPPM inclusion may enhance liver metabolism without inflicting harm. The lack of ALT readings beyond the reference range verifies the absence of hepatocellular damage (Lumeij, 1997). The ALP activity exhibited notable consistency across all treatments (121.33-122.33 μ/L) and remained within the restricted reference range. ALP participates in bone metabolism and biliary function, and the uniform levels across treatments suggest that SPPM inclusion did not influence bone metabolism or biliary integrity (Mitruka & Rawnsley, 1977). 2.3 Renal Function Urea and creatinine serve as critical indices of renal function and nitrogen metabolism (Kaneko et al., 2008). Urea values remained within normal limits throughout all treatments (3.20-5.56 mg/dL), suggesting that SPPM inclusion did not compromise renal function or nitrogen excretion. The lack of substantial changes in urea content indicates that protein utilization was effective across all treatments, along with the digestibility results presented in Topic 3. Creatinine levels (60.00-69.33 μ/L) were higher relative to the reference range (0.70-1.30 μ/L). This increase may be ascribed to species-specific variances or methodological discrepancies, as the reference range given is standard for mammals rather than avians. In avian species, creatinine is a less accurate marker of renal function compared to mammals, attributable to variations in nitrogen metabolism (Lumeij, 1997). The lack of notable variations in creatinine levels among treatments indicates that the addition of SPPM did not influence renal function. 2.4 Lipid Metabolism Cholesterol levels (3.44-4.23 mg/dL) remained within the normal reference range (2.5-5.5 mg/dL) throughout all treatments, suggesting that SPPM incorporation did not negatively impact lipid metabolism. The 25% inclusion resulted in a cholesterol rise of 4.23 mg/dL, which was not statistically significant and remained within acceptable ranges. This discovery is significant since high cholesterol levels may correlate with metabolic diseases and cardiovascular problems in chickens (Campbell, 2004). 3 Comprehensive Safety Evaluation The hematological and serum biochemical results from this study jointly demonstrate that processed sweet potato peel meal may be included into Noiler chicken diets at levels up to 75% without detrimental physiological or metabolic consequences. The subsequent evidence substantiates this conclusion: 1. No Evidence of Anemia: The lack of substantial variations in RBC count, Hb, and HCT among treatments suggests that the incorporation of SPPM did not impair red blood cell formation or oxygen transport ability. 2. No Evidence of Hepatocellular Injury: The normal activity of AST, ALT, and ALP throughout treatments indicate that liver function remained intact with the introduction of SPPM. 3. No Evidence of Renal Dysfunction: Consistent urea levels across treatments suggest that renal function and nitrogen excretion were preserved. 4. No Evidence of Immunosuppression: White blood cell counts within normal ranges indicate that immunological function was intact. Five. No Evidence of Metabolic Disorders: Normal cholesterol levels and indications of protein metabolism imply that metabolic balance was preserved. 4 Comparative Analysis with Alternative Research The results of this study align with prior research about different feed components in chicken. Amaefule et al. (2006) indicated that the incorporation of cassava peel meal in broiler diets did not negatively impact hematological parameters when added at modest levels. Fasuyi (2005) similarly noted that the inclusion of cassava leaf protein concentrates at levels up to 20% did not result in substantial alterations in liver enzyme activity in broilers. The heightened blood protein levels noted in this study resemble those documented by Akinfemi and Ogunwole (2012) for broilers using sweet potato peel-based diets. The authors ascribed the increase to the enhanced protein content and digestibility of processed sweet potato peels, aligning with the findings of the current investigation. The typical liver enzyme activity noted in this study differ from other reports of increased enzyme activities in birds using specific alternative feed ingredients that include residual anti-nutritional substances (Soetan & Oyewole, 2009). This study's lack of such increases corroborates the efficacy of fermentation in diminishing anti-nutritional components in sweet potato peels. Conclusion This study assessed the hematological and serum biochemical parameters of Noiler chickens using diets with varying quantities of processed sweet potato peel meal as a substitute for maize. From the results acquired, the subsequent conclusions may be inferred: 1. The incorporation of processed sweet potato peel meal at levels up to 75% in Noiler chicken diets did not negatively impact the majority of hematological parameters, as all assessed values remained within the usual reference limits for healthy poultry. 2. The white blood cell count dramatically rose after 50% SPPM inclusion, although all values remained within acceptable limits, indicating improved immunological competence rather than a pathogenic reaction. 3. The addition of SPPM did not substantially alter serum biochemical measures such as total protein, globulin, alkaline phosphatase, urea, and cholesterol, suggesting the preservation of protein metabolism, renal function, and lipid metabolism. 4. Albumin content considerably increased with 50% SPPM inclusion, indicating accelerated protein synthesis or less protein catabolism at this level. 5. The activities of aspartate transaminase and alanine transaminase remained within normal limits during all treatments, indicating that the addition of SPPM did not induce hepatocellular damage. 6. According to the hematological and serum biochemical analyses, processed sweet potato peel meal may be included into Noiler chicken diets at levels up to 75% without causing detrimental physiological or metabolic consequences. Small-scale poultry producers and feed formulators are advised to use fermented sweet potato peel meal into Noiler chicken diets as a safe and physiologically acceptable substitute for maize. Additional study is advised to assess the long-term impacts of SPPM incorporation on reproductive efficacy, egg quality, and the hematological and biochemical profiles of breeding stock. Furthermore, histological analysis of the liver, kidneys, and other essential organs would offer additional validation of the safety of SPPM incorporation at elevated concentrations. References Adeyemi, O. A., & Sogunle, O. M. (2018). Growth performance and carcass characteristics of Noiler chickens fed varying levels of dietary protein. Nigerian Journal of Animal Science, 20(2), 112-120. Akinfemi, A., & Ogunwole, O. A. (2012). Chemical composition and in vitro digestibility of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) peel. Journal of Animal Production Advances, 2(2), 98-103. Amaefule, K. U., Abasiekong, S. F., & Ibe, S. N. (2006). The effect of processing methods on the nutritional value of cassava (Manihot esculenta) peel meal for broiler chickens. Nigerian Journal of Animal Production, 33(1), 1-7. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. (2005). Official methods of analysis (18th ed.). AOAC International. Bounous, D. I., & Stedman, N. L. (2000). Normal avian hematology: Chicken and turkey. In B. F. Feldman, J. G. Zinkl, & N. C. Jain (Eds.), Schalm's veterinary hematology (5th ed., pp. 1147-1154). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Campbell, T. W. (2004). Hematology of birds. In D. J. Weiss & K. J. Wardrop (Eds.), Schalm's veterinary hematology (6th ed., pp. 837-847). Blackwell Publishing. Fasuyi, A. O. (2005). Nutritional evaluation of cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) leaf protein concentrate as alternative protein source in broiler ration. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 17(6), 1-8. Gbogbo, J. S., Otoikhian, C. S. O., & Ogbonna, C. N. (2012). The effect of fermentation on the nutritional quality of cassava (Manihot esculenta) peel meal. International Journal of Applied Agriculture and Apiculture Research, 8(1), 67-74. IBM Corp. (2017). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0. IBM Corp. Igbasan, F. A., & Guenter, W. (1997). The nutritional value of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) peel meal for broiler chickens. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 77(3), 527-529. Jain, N. C. (1993). Essentials of veterinary hematology. Lea & Febiger. Kaneko, J. J., Harvey, J. W., & Bruss, M. L. (2008). Clinical biochemistry of domestic animals (6th ed.). Academic Press. Lumeij, J. T. (1997). Avian clinical biochemistry. In J. J. Kaneko, J. W. Harvey, & M. L. Bruss (Eds.), Clinical biochemistry of domestic animals (5th ed., pp. 857-883). Academic Press. Mitruka, B. M., & Rawnsley, H. M. (1977). Clinical biochemical and hematological reference values in normal experimental animals. Masson Publishing. National Research Council. (1994). Nutrient requirements of poultry (9th rev. ed.). National Academy Press. Obadina, A. O., Oyewole, O. B., & Awoyale, W. (2016). Effect of processing methods on the nutritional and anti-nutritional properties of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) peel. African Journal of Food Science, 10(8), 148-154. Oluyemi, J. A., & Roberts, F. A. (2000). Poultry production in warm wet climates (2nd ed.). Spectrum Books Limited. Onyema, C. O., Ofor, M. O., & Okwu, G. N. (2015). Mineral composition of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) peel as affected by processing methods. Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences, 13(2), 45-52. Soetan, K. O., & Oyewole, O. E. (2009). The need for adequate processing to reduce the anti- nutritional factors in plants used as human foods and animal feeds: A review. African Journal of Food Science, 3(9), 223-232.