Religious and Social Misconceptions of Caesarean Section and Their Impact on Maternal and Child Health Care Among Women Attending Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu University Teaching Hospital, Amaku, Awka, Nigeria
Abstract
Background: Caesarean section (CS) is a life-saving obstetric intervention that prevents maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. Despite its proven benefits, acceptance of CS in many low- and middle-income settings is hindered by persistent religious and social misconceptions. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among 148 women aged 18–49 years attending antenatal and postnatal clinics at Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu University Teaching Hospital , Amaku Awka. Data were collected using structured questionnaires assessing knowledge, religious and social misconceptions, decision-making influences, observed outcomes, and suggested interventions. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 25 and presented as frequencies and percentages. Results: Awareness of CS was high (93.9%), and most respondents considered CS safe (92.6%). However, 57.4% reported exposure to negative religious or social beliefs about CS, including perceptions that CS is unnatural (27.0%), that women who undergo CS are not “real” mothers (23.0%), or are weak (17.6%). Although only 14.9% reported direct religious influence on personal views, 77.7% had witnessed women delay or refuse medically indicated CS due to fear or beliefs. Among these cases, 62.2% reportedly resulted in complications, including maternal death (31.1%) and neonatal death (16.9%). Most respondents supported strategies to address misconceptions, including sharing real-life experiences (95.3%), community forums (91.9%), antenatal education (87.8%), and male partner involvement (83.1%). Nearly all agreed that collaboration between health workers and religious leaders is essential (98.7%). Conclusion: Despite high awareness of caesarean section, religious and social misconceptions remain prevalent and contribute to delayed or refused care with serious maternal and neonatal consequences. Integrated, culturally sensitive interventions involving healthcare providers, religious leaders, male partners, and communities are urgently needed to improve acceptance of medically indicated CS.
Keywords
References
More Articles from INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EVALUATION AND PHYSICAL REPORT
Author: Gabriel Favour Eke, PhD, Mack Ebohol Oriakhi PhD
Author: Dabe Grace, Oluchukwu Ogechukwu Anunobi, and Daikwo Moses Alilu
Author: Oluchi Beatrice Aneke, Abimbola Caleb Adesemoye, Esther Sydney
Author: Oluchi Beatrice Aneke, Abimbola Caleb Adesemoye, Esther Sydney
Author: Mary Saidu, Phoebe Nwamaka Kanikwu, and Juliana Afemikhe
