Submit your papersSubmit Now
For Enquiries: [email protected]
IIARD LogoIIARD

Capturing and Predicting Patients’ Outcomes Using Machine Learning Algorithms

Diogu Victor Chisom, Comfort C Olebara, Elochukwu Ukwandu

Abstract

The rapid growth of digital health technologies has transformed how hospitals collect and store patient information. From electronic health records and laboratory results to vital signs and diagnostic reports, healthcare systems now generate vast amounts of data every day. Despite this progress, many healthcare providers still rely heavily on traditional statistical tools and clinical judgment when predicting patient outcomes such as recovery, complications, readmission, or mortality. These conventional approaches often struggle to fully capture the complex relationships that exist within medical data. This study introduces a practical and data-driven approach to capturing and predicting patient outcomes using machine learning algorithms. The new idea behind this research is the integration of both static patient information (such as age, gender, and medical history) and dynamic clinical indicators (such as changes in vital signs and laboratory trends over time) into a unified predictive framework. Rather than relying on a single algorithm, the study combines multiple supervised machine learning models within an ensemble structure to improve prediction accuracy and reliability. The methodology follows a quantitative experimental design using structured hospital datasets. Data preprocessing techniques are applied to handle missing values, encode categorical variables, and normalize numerical features. Relevant clinical features are selected to reduce noise and improve model performance. Several machine learning algorithms including Logistic Regression, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, Gradient Boosting, and Artificial Neural Networks are trained and evaluated using k-fold cross-validation. Model performance is assessed using standard evaluation metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and ROC-AUC, while hyperparameter tuning is used to optimize results. The proposed framework is expected to enhance early risk detection and support clinical decisio

Keywords

Patient Outcome PredictionMachine LearningHealthcare AnalyticsClinical Decision SupportElectronic Health Records.

References

Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine Learning, 45(1), 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324 Esteva, A., Kuprel, B., Novoa, R. A., Ko, J., Swetter, S. M., Blau, H. M., & Thrun, S. (2017). Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks. Nature, 542(7639), 115–118. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21056 Esteva, A., Robicquet, A., Ramsundar, B., Kuleshov, V., DePristo, M., Chou, K., ... Dean, J. (2019). A guide to deep learning in healthcare. Nature Medicine, 25(1), 24–29. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0316-z Jordan, M. I., & Mitchell, T. M. (2015). Machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects. Science, 349(6245), 255–260. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa8415 Obermeyer, Z., & Emanuel, E. J. (2016). Predicting the future — Big data, machine learning, and clinical medicine. New England Journal of Medicine, 375(13), 1216–1219. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1606181 Obermeyer, Z., Powers, B., Vogeli, C., & Mullainathan, S. (2019). Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science, 366(6464), 447–453. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax2342 Rajkomar, A., Dean, J., & Kohane, I. (2019). Machine learning in medicine. New England Journal of Medicine, 380(14), 1347–1358. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1814259 Shickel, B., Tighe, P. J., Bihorac, A., & Rashidi, P. (2018). Deep EHR: A survey of recent advances in deep learning techniques for electronic health record analysis. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, 22(5), 1589–1604. https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2017.2767063 Steyerberg, E. W. (2019). Clinical prediction models (2nd ed.). Springer.