Kurt Gödel, Gen Z, and the Undecidability of Underage Consent: A Logical Inquiry into Normative Limits
Abstract
This study applies the concept of Gödelian structural incompleteness to analyze the limitations of the Nigerian legal framework concerning underage consent and sexual exploitation. Sexual activity involving minors (under 18) or individuals whose consent is compromised by power imbalances constitutes moral wrongdoing, even if the formal legal system cannot adjudicate every case. While Nigerian law categorically prohibits sexual exploitation of persons under 18, it is formally incomplete: factors like coercion, dependency, social stigma, and institutional interference can make certain morally wrongful acts legally undecidable. Using propositional logic and a simplified framework the Situational Autonomy Test (SAT Logic) this work models the interplay between statutory defilement (strict liability) and consent-based sexual assault. SAT Logic evaluates whether true autonomy persists under situational pressures, revealing cases where exploitation is morally true but legally indeterminate. This indeterminacy reflects a structural epistemic limit on legal axioms when authority intersects with apparent consent. The findings emphasize that ethical, institutional, and community safeguards are essential to supplement formal law, ensuring the protection of vulnerable youth beyond the rigid limits of statutory proof and legal decidability.
Keywords
References
More Articles from JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL POLICY
Author: Chimezie Chukwuemeka Eze1, Joyce Uzoma Obanye2, and Emeka Nwigwe3
Author: Habiba Abdullahi Musa
Author: Eunice B. Oladije,Prof. Emmanuel B. Okmini and Abraham Chukwu, PhD
Author: Mutong Cecilia Maren, Nuhu Yakubu, Usman Zainab Sammani Vincent, Chijioke, Egbuchulam Mphil, M.ed, LPC
Author: Anike, Raphael Ugwu, Agu, Brayn Chukwuma
