Submit your papersSubmit Now
For Enquiries: [email protected]
IIARD LogoIIARD

Evaluation of Perlite-Tannic Acid Combination as Filter-Aids in Beer Production: A Pilot Scale Approach

Ntagu Tobechukwu C, Prof. Jude Iwouno, Dr. Moses Ojukwu

Abstract

This study investigated the potential of a perlite-tannic acid mixture as an alternative filter aid in beer production, focusing on filtration efficiency, beer clarity, stability, and cost savings compared to traditional kieselguhr-silica gel aids. Beer samples were filtered using an M and L Filtrox candle filter, with perlite applied as a precoat and body feed, and tannic acid used as a stabilizer. The control treatment employed kieselguhr with silica hydrogel. Tests included filter cycle monitoring (inlet pressure, throughput, haze), accelerated shelf life evaluation under thermal stress cycles, regression analysis of filtration parameters, sensory analysis, and cost-benefit analysis of filter aid consumption. The perlite-tannic acid system showed a slower inlet pressure build-up (slope + 0. 22 bar/h; R² = 0.93) compared to kieselguhr-silica gel (6 + 0.34 bar/h: R² = 0.95), indicating longer operational stability. Filtered volume increased steadily (slope +154 L/h for perlite vs. + 173 L/h for kieselguhr), but perlite achieved a higher maximum throughput (2, 640 L vs. 2, 400 L). Accelerated shelf-life testing confirmed stability for up to 12 cycles (approximately six months, with 2 cycles representing 1 month), This indicates excellent colloidal stability for perlite-tannic acid systems, with little tendency for protein-polyphenol haze formation during extended storage. Sensory evaluation revealed higher overall acceptability (7. 9 vs. 7.1) for the perlite-tannic acid system. Perlite-tannic acid filter aids demonstrated strong potential as sustainable alternative for kieselguhr-silica gel in beer filtration. Their use can maintain beer quality and stability while lowering environmental risks and providing breweries with health benefits.

Keywords

Beer; beer filterFilter aids: Kieselguhr; Silica Hydrogel; Perlite; Tannic acid.

References

Ambrosi, A., Cardozo, N. S. M. & Tessaro, I. C. 2014. Membrane Separation Processes for the Beer Industry: a Review and State of the Art. Food and Bioprocess Technology, 7, 921-936. Bächle, V., Morsch, P., Gleiß, M. & Nirschl, H. 2021. Influence of the precoat layer on the filtration properties and regeneration quality of backwashing filters. Eng, 2, 181-196. Bamforth, C. 1999. Beer haze. Journal of the American Society of Brewing Chemists57, 81-90. Baysan, U., Altay, Ö., Ayd?n, Ö. K., Baysan, I. I. & Ertekin, F. K. 2025. Application of filtration in beverage production. Mechanical Separation Processes in the Food Industry. Elsevier. Betancur, M. I., Motoki, K., Spence, C. & Velasco, C. 2020. Factors influencing the choice of beer: A review. Food Research International, 137, 109367. Bhattacharjee, C., Saxena, V. K. & Dutta, S. 2017. Fruit juice processing using membrane technology: A review. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies, 43, 136-153. Braun, F., Becker, T., Back, W. & Krottenthaler, M. J. J. O. T. a. S. O. B. C. 2010. Investigation of Beer Filtration Using Cellulose Fibers in a Pilot-Scale Filter Plant. 68, 139-147. Carvalho, F. R., Moors, P., Wagemans, J. & Spence, C. 2017. The influence of color on the consumer's experience of beer. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 2205. Charcosset, C. 2021. Classical and recent applications of membrane processes in the food industry. Food Engineering Reviews, 13, 322-343. Chen, C., Yang, H., Yang, X. & Ma, Q. 2022. Tannic acid: A crosslinker leading to versatile functional polymeric networks: A review. SC advances, 12, 7689-7711. Cimini, A. & Moresi, M. 2014. Beer clarification using ceramic tubular membranes. Food Bioprocess Technology7, 2694-2710. Ciont, C., Epuran, A., Kerezsi, A. D., Coldea, T. E., Mudura, E., Pasqualone, A., Zhao, H., Suharoschi, R., Vriesekoop, F. & Pop, O. L. 2022. Beer safety: New challenges and future trends within craft and large-scale production. Foods, 11, 2693. Conidi, C., Castro-Muñoz, R. & Cassano, A. 2020. Membrane-based operations in the fruit juice processing industry: A review. Beverages, 6, 18. Cyndi. 2022. Brewery filtration benefits with knowledge testing [Online]. Available: https://beverage-master.com/2022/03/brewery-filtration-benefits-with-knowledge-testing/ [Accessed 9th September 2024]. De Oliveira, A. G., Jandorno Jr, J. C., Da Rocha, E. B. D., De Sousa, A. M. F. & Da Silva, A. L. N. 2019. Evaluation of expanded perlite behavior in PS/Perlite composites. Applied Clay Science, 181, 105223. Devolli, A. & Kodra, M. 2017. Determination of optimal Kieselguhr doses to improve beer filtration. Dos Santos Bernardi, G., Dal Magro, J., Mazutti, M. A., Oliveira, J. V., Di Luccio, M., Zabot, G. L. & Tres, M. V. 2019. Microfiltration for filtration and pasteurization of beers. Engineering tools in the beverage industry. Elsevier. Fran?áková, H., Dráb, Š., Solgajová, M., Tóth, Ž. & Boj?anská, T. 2021. Effect of Kieselguhr Filtration on Optical Properties of Beer. Journal of Microbiology, Biotechnology and Food Sciences 2021, 2149-2157. Freeman, G. 2013. Separation technologies in brewing. Separation, Extraction and Concentration Processes in the Food, Beverage and Nutraceutical Industries. Elsevier. Gan, Q., Field, R. W., Bird, M. R., England, R., Howell, J. A., Mckechnie, M. T. & O'shaughnessy, C. L. 1997. Beer Clarification by Cross-Flow Microfiltration: Fouling Mechanisms and Flux Enhancement. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 75, 3-8. Garcia, C., Guerin, M., Souidi, K. & Remize, F. 2020. Lactic fermented fruit or vegetable juices: past, present and future.. Beverages,, 6 8. Giri, N. A., Sakhale, B. K. & Nirmal, N. P. 2023. Functional beverages: an emerging trend in beverage world. Recent Frontiers of Phytochemicals, 123-142. Habschied, K., Krstanovi?, V. & Mastanjevi?, K. J. B. 2022. Beer Quality Evaluation-A Sensory Aspect. 8, 15. Habschied, K. & Mastanjevi?, K. Maintaining the quality control of beer. International Conference on Organization and Technology of Maintenance, 2021. Springer, 435-446. Han, Y., Zhu, L., Karrar, E., Qi, X., Zhang, H. & Wu, G. 2023. Pickering foams stabilized by protein-based particles: A review of characterization, stabilization, and application. Trends in Food Science and Technology 133, 148-159. Jadhav, S. P., Shah, U. B. & Shelke, K. 2024. Current Facts about Clean Label Food Products. Food Intolerances. CRC Press. Kahle, E.-M., Zarnkow, M. & Jacob, F. 2021. Beer turbidity part 1: A review of factors and solutions. Journal of the American Society of Brewing Chemists, 79, 99-114. Kazemi, M. A., Soltanieh, M., Yazdanshenas, M. & Fillaudeau, L. 2013. Influence of crossflow microfiltration on ceramic membrane fouling and beer quality. Desalination and Water Treatment, 51, 4302-4312. Kotwica, L., Pichór, W., Kapeluszna, E. & Ró?ycka, A. 2017. Utilization of waste expanded perlite as new effective supplementary cementitious material. Journal of Cleaner production, 140, 1344-1352. Kumari, B. & Sit, N. 2025. Filtration and clarification. Mechanical Separation Processes in the Food Industry. Elsevier. Lambri, M., Colangelo, D., Dordoni, R., Torchio, F. & De Faveri, D. M. 2016. Innovations in the use of bentonite in oenology: Interactions with grape and wine proteins, colloids, polyphenols and aroma compounds. Grape wine biotechnology Lee, K. S., Woo, S. K., Sub, H. I., Seo, D. W., Park, S. J. & Park, Y. O. 2002. Filtering characteristics of porous SiC filter with high surface area. Journal of the Ceramic Society of Japan, 110, 656-661. Lutz, H., Wilkins, R. & Carbrello, C. 2013. Sterile filtration: principles, best practices and new developments. Sterile Product Development: Formulation, Process, Quality and Regulatory Considerations. Springer. Maciejewska, A. 2015. Health effects of occupational exposure to crystalline silica in the light of current research results. Medycyna Pracy. Workers' Health Safety 65, 799-818. Mastanjevi?, K., Krstanovi?, V., Lukinac, J., Juki?, M., Vulin, Z. & Mastanjevi?, K. 2018. Beer-the importance of colloidal stability (non-biological haze). rmentation, 4, 91. Maxim, L. D., Niebo, R. & Mcconnell, E. E. 2014. Perlite toxicology and epidemiology-a review. Inhalation toxicology, 26, 259-270. Mcrae, J. M., Mierczynska-Vasilev, A., Soden, A., Barker, A. M., Day, M. P. & Smith, P. A. 2017. Effect of Commercial-Scale Filtration on Sensory and Colloidal Properties of Red Wines over 18 Months Bottle Aging. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 68, 263-274. Möhner, M., Pohrt, A. & Gellissen, J. 2017. Occupational exposure to respirable crystalline silica and chronic non-malignant renal disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. International archives of occupational environmental health 90, 555-574. Molnar, M., Jakovljevi? Kova?, M. & Pavi?, V. 2024. A comprehensive analysis of diversity, structure, biosynthesis and extraction of biologically active tannins from various plant-based materials using deep eutectic solvents. Molecules 29, 2615. Newby, R., Alvin, M., Bruck, G., Lippert, T., Smeltzer, E. & Stampahar, M. 2002. Optimization of Advanced Filter Systems. National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL), Pittsburgh, PA, Morgantown, WV Nielsen, L., Cook, D., Edwards, S. & Ray, R. 2014. The prevalence and impact of Fusarium head blight pathogens and mycotoxins on malting barley quality in UK. International journal of food microbiology, 179, 38-49. Olajire, A. A. 2020. The brewing industry and environmental challenges. Journal of cleaner production 256, 102817. Olaniran, A. O., Hiralal, L., Mokoena, M. P. & Pillay, B. 2017. Flavour-active volatile compounds in beer: production, regulation and control. Journal of the Institute of Brewing, 123, 13-23. Osborne, J. 2022. Advances in microbiological quality control. Managing wine quality. Elsevier. Pallarés-Aldeiturriaga, D., Roldán-Varona, P., Rodríguez-Cobo, L. & López-Higuera, J. M. 2020. Optical fiber sensors by direct laser processing: A review. Sensors,