Submit your papersSubmit Now
For Enquiries: [email protected]
IIARD LogoIIARD

Visual and Linguistic Cues of Gender: A Semiotic Analysis of Costume, Locale, and Language in Select Nigerian Television Commercials

Siminialayi, Sotonye Shantel-Alaputa, Prof GB Okon, C J Njoku PhD

Abstract

This study examined gender stereotypes in select Nigerian television commercials, focusing on how costume, locale, and language perpetuate gendered representations across Africa Independent Television (AIT), Nigerian Television Authority (NTA), and Channels Television. Specifically, the research analyzed how costume is used to reinforce gender roles, the ways locale shapes gender narratives, how verbal and non-verbal language sustain stereotypes, and the broader societal implications of these portrayals. Anchored on the Social Cognitive Theory and Framing Theory, the study employed qualitative content analysis to critically interpret recurring patterns of gender representation in selected commercials across various product categories such as Maggi, Indomie, GTBank, Lux, and Guinness. The findings revealed that women were predominantly portrayed in domestic or beauty-centered roles through the use of aprons, wrappers, and glamorous attire, while men were dressed in corporate, sporty, or professional outfits symbolizing authority and control. Similarly, locales such as kitchens, dining rooms, and bathrooms confined women to caregiving and private spaces, whereas men were situated in offices, cars, and outdoor environments that emphasized leadership and productivity. Verbal and non-verbal cues further entrenched these stereotypes, as women were associated with soft, nurturing speech and submissive gestures, while men employed assertive tones and dominant body language. The study concluded that these portrayals normalize patriarchal ideologies and perpetuate gender inequality by valorizing men as providers and leaders and relegating women to subordinate or decorative roles. The study recommends that Nigerian media producers and advertising agencies adopt gender-sensitive approaches that promote inclusivity, challenge stereotypes, and align with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 5 on gender equality.

Keywords

Languagecostumelocalegendergender stereotype ad television commercials

References

Abayomi, T. (2024). Gender representation in Nigerian banking and finance advertisements. Journal of Media and Society, 12(3), 45–59. Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J., & Sanford, R. N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper & Row. Akpan, I., Umoren, I., Nwokeocha, A., & Amaefule, U. (2024). Gender stereotypes in Nigerian advertising: A critical analysis. Journal of Communication and Media Studies, 18(1), 110–128. Arrow, K. J. (1973). The theory of discrimination. In O. Ashenfelter & A. Rees (Eds.), Discrimination in labor markets (pp. 3–33). Princeton: Princeton University Press. Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Bordalo, P., Coffman, K., Gennaioli, N., & Shleifer, A. (2015). Stereotypes. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130(4), 1753–1794. Chandler, D. (2017). Semiotics: The basics (3rd ed.). London: Routledge. Cook, G. (2001). The discourse of advertising. London: Routledge. Crystal, D. (2010). The Cambridge encyclopedia of language (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Elliott, R., & Stead, S. (2021). Gender and power in advertising: A contemporary reappraisal. Journal of Advertising Research, 61(2), 185–201. Eze, C. (2021). Costume and gender representation in Nigerian television advertising. International Journal of Communication and Media Studies, 9(2), 77–93. Fiske, S. T. (2020). Social beings: Core motives in social psychology (4th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. Glaeser, E. (2005). The political economy of hatred. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(1), 45–86. Grau, S. L., & Zotos, Y. C. (2016). Gender stereotypes in advertising: A review of current research and future directions. International Journal of Advertising, 35(5), 761–770. Greenwald, A. G., & Pettigrew, T. F. (2019). With malice toward none and charity for some: Ingroup favoritism enables discrimination. American Psychologist, 74(2), 187–206. Hall, S. (1997). Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices. London: Sage. Hilton, J. L., & von Hippel, W. (2020). Stereotypes. Annual Review of Psychology, 71(1), 239–263. Ibrahim, S. (2022). Gendered depictions in West African advertising: Cultural continuity and change. Journal of African Media Studies, 14(1), 94–109. Kachru, B. (1992). The other tongue: English across cultures. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. Kordostami, F., & Kordostami, M. (2021). Patriarchal norms and costume representation in Iranian television commercials. Middle East Media Review, 5(2), 55–70. Kreshel, P. (2020). Advertising, gender, and identity in the 21st century. New York: Routledge. Madon, S., Jussim, L., Keiper, S., Eccles, J., Smith, A., & Palumbo, P. (2001). The accuracy of stereotypes about academic performance. Educational Psychology Review, 13(1), 1–33. Macrae, C. N., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2021). Social cognition: Understanding self and others. Annual Review of Psychology, 72, 367–392. Phelps, E. S. (1972). The statistical theory of racism and sexism. American Economic Review, 62(4), 659–661. Saussure, F. de. (1916). Course in general linguistics. New York: Philosophical Library. Schneider, D. J. (2004). The psychology of stereotyping. New York: Guilford Press. Schneider, D. J. (2022). Social psychology and human judgment: A historical overview. New York: Routledge. Solomon, M. R. (2020). Consumer behavior: Buying, having, and being (13th ed.). Harlow: Pearson Education. Souad, A., & Zahra, K. (2023). Gender stereotypes in TV commercials: A multimodal analysis approach. Journal of Media and Cultural Studies, 15(4), 201–216. Steele, C. M. (2010). Whistling Vivaldi: How stereotypes affect us and what we can do. New York: W. W. Norton & Company. Tuan, Y.-F. (1977). Space and place: The perspective of experience. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.