Submit your papersSubmit Now
For Enquiries: [email protected]
IIARD LogoIIARD

Strategies of Persuasion in Deliberative Discourse: An Analysis of Kenyan Parliamentary Committee Reports

Safari G Ntalala PhD

Abstract

Political debates and deliberations have always been emotive in Kenya although many individuals lack knowledge on political discourse and the motivation behind it. This article discusses strategies of persuasion as realized in Kenyan parliamentary debates, specifically parliamentary committee reports. Parliamentary committee reports are about making choices and collective decisions about what action to take in response to a situation. Because of competing interests, purposes and values, among legislators; parliamentary committee reports (PCRs) require clear strategies of persuasion, in order to unfold their deliberative and persuasive goals. This study analysis the rhetorical appeals used in selected Kenyan parliamentary committee reports so as to achieve the genre’s communicative purpose. The study involves an examination of rhetorical strategies of persuasion used in PCRs including logos, ethos as well as pathos. This paper is premised on Aristotle’s Rhetoric art of persuasion theory. Descriptive research design was used with corpora being generated from fifteen parliamentary committee reports sampled five each from selected County Assemblies, the National Assembly and the Senate. Findings from the study indicate that different rhetorical appeals are blended together geared at convincing and persuading legislators to adopt PCRs. The findings offer insights on the interplay between deliberative discourse styles, rhetorical persuasive patterns and contribute to the pool of knowledge on genre, communication and rhetorical analysis.

Keywords

Deliberative discoursegenreParliamentary Committee Reports and Rhetorical

References

Atieno, C. (2016). Hate speech in the creation of socio- political dominance in Kenyan parliamentary debates. American International Journal of Contemporary Research Vol.6 (5) 78-86. Bayley,P. (2004). Cross cultural perspective on parliamentary discourse. Philadelphia: John Benjamin. Bhatia, V. (1993). Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings. London: Longman. Bhatia, V. (2002). A generic view of academic discourse. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic discourse. Harlow: Longman. Bhatia, V. (2005) Generic Patterns in Promotional Discourse. In H. Halmari (Ed.) Persuasion across genres: A linguistic approach (pp. 213-228). Amsterdam: Benjamins Publishing Company Clement, K. (2015). The appeals of arguments. Kaplain: Kaplain University Writing Centre Gachigua, S. (2006). Power elite conflict in Kenya’s ninth parliament and the implications for democratic transition. Draft paper for Council for the Development of Social Science Research in Africa (CODESRIA) Governance Institute on The Legislature in Africa’s Democratic Transition, Dakar, Senegal. Gachigua, S. (2010). Should public officers make open declarations of their wealth? Kenyan parliamentary discourse on the fight against corruption. Papers from the Lancaster University Postgraduate Conference in Linguistics & Language Teaching. Halliday, M. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold Halliday, M. (2006). Systematic theory. In Brown,K. (ed). The encyclopedia of language and linguistics (2nd ed.). Oxford: Elsevier Ltd. Halliday, M. A., & Hasan, R. (1989). Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Hühn MP, Meyer M (2023). Sophistry or wisdom in words: Aristotle on rhetoric and leadership. Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility. 2023;32(2):544554. Hyland, K. (1990). A genre description of the argumentative essay. RELC journal: A Journal of Language Teaching and Research in South East Asia, 21(1):66-78. Hyland, K. (1998). Persuasion and context: The pragmatic of academic metadiscourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 30, (2) 437-455. Hyland, K. (2002). Genre-based pedagogies: A social response to process. Journal of second language writing, vol No.12, (3) 17-29. Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse: Exploring interactions in writing. London & Newyork: Continuum Illie, C. (2000). Clinche-based metadiscursive argumentation in the houses of parliament. International Journal of applied Linguistics, 10(1), 65-84. Illie, C. (2003). Discourse and metadiscourse in parliamentary debate. Journal of Language and Politics, 2, (1) 269-291. Illie, C. (2006). Parliamentary discourse. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics (2nd ed., Vol. 9). Oxford: Elsevier. Ilie, C. (2015). Parliamentary discourse. The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interactions(1st edition). Retrieved from: http//www.researchgate netpublication . /303459695. Jakaza, E (2019). Argumentation and Appraisal in Parliamentary Discourse Hershey, Pennsylvania, IGI Global. Karanja, L. (1993). Discourse analysis of KBC broadcast discussion programmes. Unpublished M.A Thesis: University of Nairobi: Kennedy, G. (2007). Aristotle, on rhetoric: A theory of civic discourse, 2nd ed. Oxford: oxford University press. Killingsworth, M. (2005). Appeals in modern rhetoric: An ordinary language approach. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University press. Killingsworth, M. (2010). Rhetorical appeals: A revision. Rhetoric Review, 24(3):249-263 Kisulu, D. (2006). Proposal and thesis writing: An introduction. Nairobi: Pauline Publications. Kuchel L, Rowland S. (2023). Rhetoric, influence, and persuasion. In: Teaching Science Students to Communicate: A Practical Guide. Cham: Springer International Publishing; p. 11-19. Maroko, G. (1998). The rhetorical structure of M.A proposals in Kenyatta University. Unpublished M.A thesis: Kenyatta University. Maroko, G. (2008). A genre analysis of selected Master of Arts (MA) and Master of Science (MSC) theses in Kenyan public Universities. Unpublished PHD thesis: Kenyatta University. Miller, C. (1984). Genre as a social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, (3) 151-167. Miller, C. (2005). Genre and new rhetoric. Quarterly Journal of Speech: Vol 70, (2) 342-365. Nyongesa, B. (2005). Kenyan newspaper discourse: An investigation of rhetorics in editorials as argumentation. Unpublished M.A Thesis: Kenyatta University Odah,E.M (2025).Persuasive rhetoric in public speaking: A discourse analysis of influential leaders. International Journal of Research in English 2025; 7(1): 598-611 Onguko, S. (1999). A comparative study of cohesion in academic and newspaper texts. Unpublished M.A Thesis: Kenyatta University Ramage, J. (1998). Writing arguments, 4th ed. Needham: Heights, MA. Republic of Kenya. (2010). The constitution of Kenya, 2010. Nairobi: Government Press. Roberts, W. R. (1909). Jebb’s Translation of Aristotle’s Rhetoric [Review of The Rhetoric of Aristotle, by R. C. Jebb & J. E. Sandys]. The Classical Review, 23(8), 263–265. http://www.jstor.org/stable/696843 Steiner, J. (2004). Deliberative politics in action: Analyzing parliamentary discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Swales, J. (1993). Genre and engagement. Revue Belge de Philologie et d'Histoire, 71(3), 687- Swales, J.M. (2004). Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge: CUP. Treimane, L. (2009). The features of British parliamentary spoken discourse. University of Latvia: Riga. Treimane, L. (2011). Analyzing parliamentary discourse: Systematic functional perspective. Retrieved from www.ledykla.eu/fileadm/.78-94 pdf. Van Djik, T. (2000). Parliamentary debates. In Wodak, R. (2000). Racism at the top: parliamentary discourse on ethical issues in six European states, 45-78. Van Dijk, T. (2004). Critical discourse analysis. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. E. Hamilton (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 352-371). Oxford, UK: Blackwell. Wodak, R & Van Dijk, T. (2000). Racism at the Top: The investigation, explanation and countering of xenophobia and racism. Drava:Klagenfurt.