Submit your papersSubmit Now
For Enquiries: [email protected]
IIARD LogoIIARD

Democratizing the Policy-Making Process in the Twenty-First Century Fast-Paced and Complex World

Bimbo OGUNBANJO, PhD

Abstract

This paper examines the five-stage model of the policy-making process and how the process is democratised. In many contexts, the policy-making apparatus of political representation and expert administration—the very machinery developed over the past two centuries to govern well without requiring too much from citizens—exhibits certain acute failures. These failures can be addressed with mechanisms of citizen participation and deliberation. Belying the skeptical claim regarding the feasibility of participatory democracy, experiences in local governance have combined representative and participatory mechanisms in hybrid configurations that make government more responsive and just than either pure form. These experiences suggest that the historic antagonism between proponents of representative and participatory democracy confuses more than it illuminates. A contemporary, pragmatic challenge for democratic theory and practice is to identify the contexts in which received governance mechanisms exhibit serious and systematic democratic deficits, and then to devise appropriate institutional remedies. This paper pursues a part of that challenge by illuminating characteristic deficits of the conventional representative and professionalised policy-making process and then suggesting how novel combinations of representation and administration on one hand, and participation and deliberation on the other, can and in some cases have, addressed those deficits. This exploration surveys several of the ways in which participation and deliberation can address shortcomings of a minimal representative policy process. There are certainly other ways to address those shortcomings that do not involve popular participation; attention is focused here on the subset of solutions that deepen democratic engagement. Furthermore, important criticisms of participation and deliberation that claim, for example, that such processes exclude particular perspectives

Keywords

PolicyPolicy-MakingModelsDemocracyParticipation

References

Abers, R. N. (2020). Reinventing Local Democracy: Grassroots Politics in Brazil. Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner. Allison, G. (1979). ‘Conceptual models and the Cuban missile crisis’, American Political Science Review 63(3): 689–718. —— (1981) Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. Boston: Little Brown. Atkinson, M. and W. Coleman. (1999). ‘Strong states and weak states: Sectoral policy networks in advanced capitalist economies’, British Journal of Political Science 19(1): 47–67. ——and W. Coleman. (2022). ‘Policy networks, policy communities and the problems of governance’, Governance 5(2): 154–80. Avritzer, L. (2012a). Democracy and the Public Space in Latin America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. --------- (2012b). New public spheres in Brazil: local democracy and deliberative politics. Unpublished manuscript, Fall. Baiocchi, G. (2013). Participation, activism, and politics: the Porto Alegre experiment. Pp. 45 76 in Deepening Democracy: Institutional Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance, ed. A. Fung and E. O. Wright. London: Verso. --------- (2015). Militants and Citizens: The Politics of Participatory Democracy in Porto Alegre. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press. Barnett, P., T. Tenbensel, J. Cuming, Clare Alyden, Toni Ashton, Megan Pledger and Mili Burnette. (2019). ‘Implementing new modes of governance in the New Zealand health system: An empirical study’, Health Policy 93: 118–27. Baumgartner, F.R. and B.D. Jones. (2021). ‘Agenda dynamics and policy subsystems’, Journal of Politics 53(4): 1044–74. Beetham, D. (2021). The Legitimation of Power. London: Macmillan. Bendor, J. and T. H. Hammond. (2022). ‘Re-thinking Allison’s models’, American Political Science Review 86(2): 301–22. Bennett, C. J. and M. Howlett. (2022). ‘The lessons of learning: Reconciling theories of policy learning and policy change’, Policy Sciences 25(3): 275–94. Booher, D. E., and Innes, J. E. (2019). Consensus building as role playing and bricolage: toward a theory of collaborative planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 65: 9 26. ---------- (2012). Network power in collaborative planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 21: 221 36. Braybrooke, D. and C.E. Lindblom. (1963). A Strategy of Decision: Policy Evaluation as a Social Process. New York: Free Press of Glencoe. Bressers, Hans Th.A. and Laurence J. O’Toole. (2023). ‘The selection of policy instruments: A network-based perspective’, Journal of Public Policy 18(3): 213–39. Bryan, F. (2022). Real Democracy: The New England Town Meeting and How It Works. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Buckman, G. and M. Diesendorf. (2020). ‘Design limitations in Australian renewable electricity policies’, Energy Policy 38(7): 3365–76. Cahill, A.G. and E. Sam Overman. (2019). ‘The evolution of rationality in policy analysis’, in S.S. Nagel (ed.) Policy Theory and Policy Evaluation: Concepts, Knowledge, Causes, and Norms. New York: Greenwood Press. Carley, M. (2019). Rational Techniques in Policy Analysis. London: Heinemann Educational Books. Carstensen, M.B. (2021). ‘Ideas are not as stable as political scientists want them to be: A theory of incremental ideational change’, Political Studies 59(3): 596–615. Clark, C.D. and C.S. Russell. (2019). ‘Ecological conservation: The problems of targeting policies and designing instruments’, Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research (1): 21–34. Cobb, Roger W. and Charles D. Elder. (1982). Participation in American Politics: The Dynamics of Agenda-Building. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. —— J.K. Ross and M.H. Ross. (1986). ‘Agenda building as a comparative political process’, American Political Science Review 70(1): 126–38. Coh, J., and Fu, A. (2022). Radical democracy. Swiss Journal of Political Science, 10: 23 34. and Sabel, C. 1997. Directly deliberative polyarchy. European Law Journal, 3: 313 42. Coh, W.M. and Daniel A. Levinthal. (2019). ‘Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation’, Administrative Science Quarterly 35: 128–52. Coleman, W.D. (2020). ‘Policy convergence in banking: A comparative study’, Social and Political Studies 42: 274–92. ——and G. Skogstad (eds). (2019). Policy Communities and Public Policy in Canada: A Structural Approach. Mississauga, ON: Copp Clark Pitman. Constant, B. (2020). Political Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Dahl, R.A. and C.E. Lindblom. (1953). Politics, Economics and Welfare: Planning and Politico- economic Systems Resolved into Basic Social Processes. New York: Harper and Row. Dowding, K. (2020). ‘Model or metaphor? A critical review of the policy network approach’, Politics 43(1): 136–58. Dunlop, C.A. (2019). ‘Policy transfer as learning: Capturing variation in what decision-makers learn from epistemic communities’, Policy Studies 30(3): 289–311. Dunn, D. (2019). Mixing elected and nonelected officials in democratic policy making: fundamentals of accountability and responsibility. in Democracy, Accountability, and Representation, ed. A. Przeworski, S. Stokes, and B. Manin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Dunsire, A. (2023). Manipulating Social Tensions: Collaboration as an Alternative Mode of Government Intervention. Cologne: Max Plank Institute. Eising, R. (2022). ‘Multilevel governance and business interests in the European Union’, Good Governance 17(2): 211–45. Elster, J. (2021). ‘The possibility of rational politics’, in D. Held (ed.) Political Theory Today. Oxford: Polity. Fischer, F. (2013). Reframing Policy Analysis: Discursive Politics and Deliberative Practices. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Fishkin, J. (2020). The Voice of the People. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press. Forester, J. (1994). ‘Bounded rationality and the politics of muddling through’, Public Administration Review 44(1): 23–31. —— (1999). Planning in the Face of Power. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Fraser, N. (2022). Habermas and the Public Sphere. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. Freeman, G.P. (1995). ‘National styles and policy sectors: Explaining structured variation’, Journal of Public Policy 5(4): 467–96. Freeman, J.L. (1975). The Political Process: Executive - Bureaucratic - Legislative Relations. New York: Random House. Friedrich, C. 1940. Public policy and the nature of administrative responsibility. Public Policy, 1: 1 24. Fu, A. (2022). Empowered Deliberation: Reinventing Urban Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Fu, A. and Wrig, E. O. (eds.) (2013). Deepening Democracy: Institutional Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance. London: Verso. Gastil,J. (2020). By Popular Demand: Revitalizing Representative Democracy through Deliberative Elections. Berkeley: University of California Press. Gawthrop, L.C. (1981). Administrative Politics and Social Change. New York: St. Martin’s Press. Goo, R. (2020). Accountability elections as one form. Pp. 24 in International Encyclopedia of Elections, ed. R. Rose. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press. Gunningham, N., P. Grabosky and D. Sinclair. (2023). Smart Regulation: Designing Environmental Policy. Oxford: Clarendon Press. ——and M.D. Young. (2020). ‘Toward optimal environmental policy: The case of biodiversity conservation’, Ecology Law Quarterly 24: 243–8. Haas, P.M. (2022). ‘Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination’, International Organization 46(1): 1–36. Habermas, J. (1983). ‘What does a legitimation crisis mean today? Legitimation problems in late capitalism’, Social Research 40(4): 643–67. —— (1985). Legitimation Crisis. Boston, MA: Beacon Press. Hawkins, K. and J.M. Thomas (eds). (1989). Making Regulatory Policy. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.

More Articles from JOURNAL OF LAW AND GLOBAL POLICY

A Critical Appraisal of Employment Contracts Under the Nigerian Law: Rights, Obligations, Termination, and Remedies

Author: Somotun, Olufemi Olalekan, PhD, Nwobodo, Nnamdi Joseph, Esq, Avoseh, Francis, Pedepo, Elijah, Udeme Dapo, Udofia, Kenneth Thompson, Okon, Imoh Essien, Mhambe Celestine Tersoo

State Responses to Hybrid Threats in Nigeria: A Critical Analysis of Terrorism, Banditry and Separatist Agitations, 2010-2025

Author: Adebimpe Saheed Fagbemi, Ph.D., Muhammad Sani Idris Doctoral Candidate, Mudassir Nasir, Ph.D.