The Impact of Strategic Spatial Planning on Activity Flow in Youth Development Centres

CHINWOR; Okechukwu Confidence; ADIBE-OKWAKPAM Nkeiruka

doi:10.56201/ijemt.vol.11.no8.2025.pg28.40

📄 Download Paper

The Impact of Strategic Spatial Planning on Activity Flow in Youth Development Centres

CHINWOR, Okechukwu Confidence, ADIBE-OKWAKPAM Nkeiruka

Abstract

This study explores the impact of strategic spatial planning on activity flow within youth development centres, focusing on how spatial organisation influences user experience, movement efficiency, and functional synergy. As multifunctional spaces serving educational, recreational, and developmental needs, youth centres require thoughtful spatial configurations to perform effectively. Through a qualitative, design-based methodology involving literature review, case study analysis, and spatial observation, this research identifies key planning strategies that significantly enhance activity engagement and operational performance. These strategies include program or activity compatibility and adjacency, circulation integration, flexibility and multi-use potential, accessibility, and the integration of indoor and outdoor spaces. Findings reveal that when these principles are intentionally applied, youth facilities benefit from intuitive navigation, balanced spatial hierarchy, increased user participation, and improved safety. Effective spatial organisation was also shown to reduce congestion, support inclusive access, and optimise transitions between functional zones. The study culminates in a site-specific design proposal in which these strategies were practically applied. The design demonstrates how deliberate spatial planning can transform static environments into inclusive, adaptable, and high-performing youth development centres that respond to the evolving needs of users. By placing emphasis on spatial hierarchy, modularity, and connectivity, the proposed layout supports efficient circulation, encourages interaction, and aligns with programmatic demands. This work contributes to the discourse on youth infrastructure by offering practical design insights and spatial recommendations. It serves as a valuable guide for architects, planners, and policymakers seeking to develop resilient, flexible, and user-responsive youth spac

Keywords

Youth development centres; Strategic spatial planning; Activity flow; Spatial organisation; Circulation integration; Flexibility and adaptability; Functional zoning; Indooroutdoor connectivity.

References

Carmona, M. (2019). Principles for public space design, planning to do better. Urban Design International, 24(1), 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-018-0070-3 ChildCareNow. (2025). Spotlight: Why physical environment matters in child care. https://childcarenow.ca/2025/02/19/why-physical-environment-matters-in-child-care- spotlight-report/ Cheshmehzangi, A. (2020). Urban design in the context of strategic spatial planning. Sustainability, 12(13), 5261. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135261 Ehule, I. C., Amadi, R. N., Nsereka, B. G., & Dike, H. W. (2024). Television gaming habits among youths in Port Harcourt metropolis. Research Journal of Mass Communication and Information Technology, 10(5), 169–180. https://www.iiardjournals.org/get/RJMCIT/VOL.%2010%20NO.%205%202024/TEL EVISION%20GAMING%20HABITS%20169-180.pdf Hosseini, S. M., & Mohammadi, M. (2021). User flow and spatial legibility in public buildings. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 10(3), 398–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2020.09.006 Hudec, M., & Rollová, L. (2019). Flexible design strategies for multifunctional community spaces. Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, 43(4), 349–362. https://doi.org/10.3846/jau.2019.11785 Kim, J., & Lee, S. (2020). Spatial organisation strategies for multifunctional cultural centres. Buildings, 10(12), 234. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings10120234 Koohsari, M. J., Owen, N., & Sugiyama, T. (2020). Space syntax and walking behaviour in public facilities. Health & Place, 61, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.102267 Marques, B., McIntosh, J., & Wilson, E. (2021). Designing youth spaces for engagement and belonging. Cities, 113, 103154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103154 Mehta, V., & Bosson, J. K. (2021). Third places and community building: Fostering social capital through design. Journal of Urban Design, 26(6), 735–754. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2020.1859110 Salameh, M., Touqan, B., & Salameh, M. (2020). Courtyard design in schools and its influence on students’ satisfaction. 5th World Congress on Civil, Structural, and Environmental Engineering (CSEE’20), Lisbon, Portugal (Virtual Conference). https://doi.org/10.11159/icgre20.197 Sanders, J., & Munford, R. (2014). Youth-centred practice: Positive youth development practices and pathways to better outcomes for vulnerable youth. Children and Youth Services Review, 46, 160–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.08.020 Smith, T., Allen, P., & Green, J. (2022). The influence of spatial planning on community facility performance. International Journal of Architectural Research, 16(1), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARCH-09-2021-0223 UN-Habitat. (2022). Designing inclusive public spaces. https://unhabitat.org/designing- inclusive-public-spaces Zeisel, J. (2020). Inquiry by design: Environment/behavior/neuroscience in architecture. W. W. Norton & Company.

The Impact of Strategic Spatial Planning on Activity Flow in Youth Development Centres

Abstract

Keywords

References

More Articles from INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND MODERN TECHNOLOGY