References
Ali, H., Khan, E., & Sajad, M. A. (2013). Phytoremediation of heavy metals—Concepts and applications. Chemosphere, 91(7), 869-881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.01.075 Arp, D. J., Yeager, C. M., & Hyman, M. R. (2001). Molecular and cellular fundamentals of aerobic cometabolism of trichloroethylene. Biodegradation, 12(2), 81-103. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012089904958 Atlas, R. M., & Hazen, T. C. (2009). Oil biodegradation and bioremediation: A tale of the two worst spills in U.S. history. Environmental Science & Technology, 43(15), 5671–5676. https://doi.org/10.1021/es8015222 Atlas, R. M., & Hazen, T. C. (2009). Oil biodegradation and bioremediation: A tale of the two worst spills in U.S. history. Environmental Science & Technology, 43(15), 5671–5676. https://doi.org/10.1021/es8015222 Azubuike, C. C., Chikere, C. B., & Okpokwasili, G. C. (2016). Bioremediation techniques– classification based on site of application: Principles, advantages, limitations and prospects. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 32(11), 180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-016-2137-x Azubuike, C. C., Chikere, C. B., & Okpokwasili, G. C. (2016). Bioremediation techniques– classification based on site of application: Principles, advantages, limitations and prospects. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 32(11), 180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-016-2137-x Azubuike, C. C., Chikere, C. B., & Okpokwasili, G. C. (2016). Bioremediation techniques– classification based on site of application: Principles, advantages, limitations and prospects. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 32(11), 180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-016-2137-x Azubuike, C. C., Chikere, C. B., & Okpokwasili, G. C. (2016). Bioremediation techniques– classification based on site of application: Principles, advantages, limitations and prospects. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 32(11), 180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-016-2137-x Azubuike, C. C., Chikere, C. B., & Okpokwasili, G. C. (2016). Bioremediation techniques– classification based on site of application: Principles, advantages, limitations and prospects. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 32(11), 180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-016-2137-x Azubuike, C. C., Chikere, C. B., & Okpokwasili, G. C. (2016). Bioremediation techniques– classification based on site of application: Principles, advantages, limitations and prospects. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 32(11), 180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-016-2137-x Azubuike, C. C., Chikere, C. B., & Okpokwasili, G. C. (2016). Bioremediation techniques– classification based on site of application: Principles, advantages, limitations and prospects. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 32(11), 180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-016-2137-x Banat, I. M., Nigam, P., Singh, D., & Marchant, R. (1996). Microbial decolorization of textile- dye-containing effluents: A review. Bioresource Technology, 58(3), 217–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(96)00113-7 Bizily, S. P., Rugh, C. L., & Meagher, R. B. (2000). Phytodetoxification of hazardous organomercurials by genetically engineered plants. Nature Biotechnology, 18(2), 213- https://doi.org/10.1038/72678 Bumpus, J. A., Tien, M., Wright, D., & Aust, S. D. (1985). Oxidation of persistent environmental pollutants by a white rot fungus. Science, 228(4706), 1434-1436. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.228.4706.1434 Das, N., & Chandran, P. (2011). Microbial degradation of petroleum hydrocarbon contaminants: An overview. Biotechnology Research International, 2011, 941810. https://doi.org/10.4061/2011/941810 Devinny, J. S., Deshusses, M. A., & Webster, T. S. (1999). Biofiltration for air pollution control. CRC Press. Dixit, R., Malaviya, D., Pandiyan, K., Singh, U. B., Sahu, A., Shukla, R., ... & Paul, D. (2015). Bioremediation of heavy metals from soil and aquatic environment: An overview of principles and criteria of fundamental processes. Sustainability, 7(2), 2189-2212. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7022189 Dzionek, A., Wojcieszy?ska, D., & Guzik, U. (2016). Natural carriers in bioremediation: A review. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology, 19(5), 28–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejbt.2016.07.003 Dzionek, A., Wojcieszy?ska, D., & Guzik, U. (2016). Natural carriers in bioremediation: A review. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology, 19(5), 28–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejbt.2016.07.003 Dzionek, A., Wojcieszy?ska, D., & Guzik, U. (2016). Natural carriers in bioremediation: A review. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology, 19(5), 28–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejbt.2016.07.003 Dzionek, A., Wojcieszy?ska, D., & Guzik, U. (2016). Natural carriers in bioremediation: A review. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology, 19(5), 28–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejbt.2016.07.003 Ellis, D. E., Lutz, E. J., O’Neil, J. R., et al. (2000). Bioaugmentation for accelerated in situ anaerobic bioremediation. Environmental Science & Technology, 34(11), 2254–2260. https://doi.org/10.1021/es990638e Fernández-Fernández, M., Sanromán, M. Á., & Moldes, D. (2013). Recent developments and applications of immobilized laccase. Biotechnology Advances, 31(8), 1808-1825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2012.02.013 Ghosal, D., Ghosh, S., Dutta, T. K., & Ahn, Y. (2016). Current state of bioremediation: The use of genetically engineered microorganisms (GEMs) for bioremediation. Frontiers in Microbiology, 7, 1916. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01916 Ghosal, D., Ghosh, S., Dutta, T. K., & Ahn, Y. (2016). Current state of bioremediation: The use of genetically engineered microorganisms (GEMs) for bioremediation. Frontiers in Microbiology, 7, 1916. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01916 Ghosal, D., Ghosh, S., Dutta, T. K., & Ahn, Y. (2016). Current state of bioremediation: The use of genetically engineered microorganisms (GEMs) for bioremediation. Frontiers in Microbiology, 7, 1916. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01916 Ghosal, D., Ghosh, S., Dutta, T. K., & Ahn, Y. (2016). Current state of bioremediation: The use of genetically engineered microorganisms (GEMs) for bioremediation. Frontiers in Microbiology, 7, 1916. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01916 Ghosal, D., Ghosh, S., Dutta, T. K., & Ahn, Y. (2016). Current state of bioremediation: The use of genetically engineered microorganisms (GEMs) for bioremediation. Frontiers in Microbiology, 7, 1916. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01916 Grand View Research. (2021). Bioremediation market size, share & trends analysis report by type, by technology, by service, by region, and segment forecasts, 2021–2028. https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/bioremediation-market Hug, L. A., Beiko, R. G., Rowe, A. R., et al. (2013). Comparative metagenomics of three Dehalococcoides-containing enrichment cultures: The role of the non-dechlorinating community. BMC Genomics, 14(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-14-692 Jain, A., & Bajpai, V. (2022). CRISPR-based approaches for environmental bioremediation. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 73, 258–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2021.09.007 Johnson, D. B., & Hallberg, K. B. (2005). Acid mine drainage remediation options: A review. Science of the Total Environment, 338(1–2), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.09.002 Kaksonen, A. H., Riekkola-Vanhanen, M. L., & Puhakka, J. A. (2003). Optimization of metal sulphide precipitation in fluidized-bed treatment of acid mine drainage. Water Research, 37(2), 255–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(02)00280-0 Khehra, M. S., Saini, H. S., Sharma, D. K., et al. (2005). Decolorization of various azo dyes by bacterial consortium. Dyes and Pigments, 67(